A statement of the Democratic Socialists of America International Committee, July 2026. En español a continuación.

What is happening in Ecuador is a coup conducted without tanks. Its weapons are electoral councils, tribunals, and prosecutors, and its result is the one every coup seeks: a government that no longer has to face its opponents on equal terms. In a single week of July, the government of President Daniel Noboa closed three of the channels through which Ecuadorians contest power, each time by a lawful-looking decision of an ostensibly neutral body.

On July 15, the National Electoral Council refused to release the forms citizens need to gather signatures for a recall of the president, a right written into the constitution, ending the effort before anyone could sign.^[1] Days earlier the Constitutional Court had refused even to hear the appeal of the Citizen Revolution, the largest opposition force, against its own suspension, citing a rule that blocks review during an election period, which is the only period when the suspension bites.^[2] Then the electoral tribunal suspended AMIGO, the movement under which Citizen Revolution candidates had arranged to run, one day before the deadline to register alliances.^[3] Throughout, Noboa litigated against the recall aimed at him before the very council deciding whether it could proceed.^[4]

This is not a seizure of power in the night. It is the steady conversion of the referees, the electoral council, the courts, the prosecutor, into instruments of the incumbent. Each step survives inspection on its own. Together they let a president choose his opponents.

It did not begin with paperwork. During last autumn’s national strike against austerity, security forces killed three protesters and charged demonstrators as terrorists.^[5] And it is not only Ecuador’s affair. Ecuadorians voted in November 2025 to reject foreign military bases; the United States deployed personnel to Manta anyway, and by July the chief of U.S. Southern Command was in Quito reviewing Noboa’s security plan in person.^[6] Our own government has set aside a vote of the Ecuadorian people, which places a particular duty on socialists in the U.S.

To the citizens’ platform Revoca EC and the attorney Washington Andrade; to Leonidas Iza, acting as president of Ecuarunari; to the peasant, labor, and teachers’ organizations, FENOCIN, the FUT, the Frente Popular, and the UNE, who filed the second recall petition against austerity and the agreement with the International Monetary Fund; and to every rank-and-file member of the Citizen Revolution whose party the electoral tribunal has barred from the ballot: we see you, and we stand with you.

We do not write to instruct anyone in Ecuador how to conduct their struggle. We write to affirm a principle that stands above any single party’s fortunes: the recall belongs to the people, not to a party, and the right to appear on a ballot cannot depend on the incumbent’s convenience. The government suspended its largest opposition without ever proving the charge, because it timed the suspension to the one period when the courts are barred from reviewing it. A case that cannot survive review is not a case. It is a tactic.

DSA members: raise Ecuador where you are. Bring this statement to your chapter, and demand that your own representatives end the U.S. military and police cooperation that underwrites this repression. The local elections of November 29 will test whether Ecuador’s doors are narrowed or shut. Doors closed by law can be reopened by law, but only while some remain open, and solidarity is one of the things that keeps them open.

The recall is not a party’s weapon. It is the people’s. From Quito to Chicago, our struggle is one.

Sobre Ecuador: Cuando los árbitros se unen a un equipo

Declaración del Comité Internacional de los Socialistas Democráticos de Estados Unidos, julio de 2026. En español a continuación.

Lo que está sucediendo en Ecuador es un golpe de Estado llevado a cabo sin tanques. Sus armas son los consejos electorales, los tribunales y los fiscales, y su resultado es el que todo golpe busca: un gobierno que ya no tenga que enfrentarse a sus oponentes en igualdad de condiciones. En una sola semana de julio, el gobierno del presidente Daniel Noboa cerró tres de los canales a través de los cuales los ecuatorianos disputan el poder, cada vez mediante una decisión de apariencia legal de un organismo aparentemente neutral.

El 15 de julio, el Consejo Nacional Electoral se negó a entregar los formularios que los ciudadanos necesitan para recolectar firmas para una revocatoria del presidente, un derecho consagrado en la Constitución, poniendo fin a la iniciativa antes de que nadie pudiera firmar.^[7] Días antes, la Corte Constitucional se había negado incluso a admitir a trámite el recurso de la Revolución Ciudadana (RC 5), la mayor fuerza de oposición, contra su propia suspensión, alegando una norma que impide la revisión durante el período electoral, que es el único período en el que la suspensión surte efecto.^[8] Luego, el tribunal electoral suspendió a AMIGO, el movimiento bajo el cual los candidatos de la RC  se habían organizado para postularse, un día antes de la fecha límite para registrar alianzas.^[9] Durante todo este proceso, Noboa litigó contra la destitución dirigida en su contra ante el mismo consejo que decidía si esta podía seguir adelante.^[10]

Esto no es un golpe de Estado en la noche. Es la conversión paulatina de los árbitros —el consejo electoral, los tribunales, la fiscalía— en instrumentos del presidente en ejercicio. Cada paso resiste el escrutinio por sí solo. Juntos, permiten que un presidente elija a sus oponentes.

No comenzó con trámites burocráticos. Durante el paro nacional de septiembre y octubre de 2025 ante el Decreto Ejecutivo 126 del gobierno de Daniel Noboa, que elevó el precio del diésel,  la austeridad, las fuerzas de seguridad mataron a tres manifestantes y acusaron a los manifestantes de ser terroristas.^[11] Y no es solo un asunto de Ecuador. Los ecuatorianos votaron en noviembre de 2025 para rechazar las bases militares extranjeras; Estados Unidos desplegó personal en Manta de todos modos, y para julio el jefe del Comando Sur de EE. UU. estaba en Quito revisando el plan de seguridad de Noboa en persona.^[12] Nuestro propio gobierno ha hecho caso omiso de un voto del pueblo ecuatoriano, lo que impone un deber especial a los socialistas en EE. UU.

A la plataforma ciudadana Revoca EC y al abogado Washington Andrade; a Leonidas Iza, en calidad de presidente de Ecuarunari; a las organizaciones campesinas, sindicales y de docentes —FENOCIN, la FUT, el Frente Popular y la UNE—, que presentaron la segunda petición de revocatoria contra la austeridad y el acuerdo con el Fondo Monetario Internacional; y a cada miembro de base de la Revolución Ciudadana, cuyo partido ha sido excluido de la boleta electoral por el tribunal electoral: los vemos y estamos con ustedes.

No escribimos para instruir a nadie en Ecuador sobre cómo llevar a cabo su lucha. Escribimos para afirmar un principio que está por encima de las vicisitudes de cualquier partido en particular: la revocatoria le pertenece al pueblo, no a un partido, y el derecho a aparecer en una boleta electoral no puede depender de la conveniencia del titular del cargo. El gobierno suspendió a su mayor oposición sin jamás probar la acusación, porque programó la suspensión para el único período en el que los tribunales no pueden revisarla. Un caso que no puede resistir una revisión no es un caso. Es una táctica.

Miembros de la DSA: hablen sobre Ecuador dondequiera que estén. Lleven esta declaración a su sección local y exijan que sus propios representantes pongan fin a la cooperación militar y policial de EE. UU. que respalda esta represión. Las elecciones locales del 29 de noviembre pondrán a prueba si las puertas de Ecuador están más estrechas o cerradas. Las puertas cerradas por ley pueden volver a abrirse por ley, pero solo mientras algunas permanezcan abiertas, y la solidaridad es una de las cosas que las mantiene abiertas.

La revocatoria no es un arma de un partido. Es del pueblo. Desde Quito hasta Chicago, nuestra lucha es una sola.

^[1]El Universo, July 15, 2026.
^[2]Primicias, July 15, 2026.
^[3]La República, July 17, 2026.
^[4]Qué Noticias, July 8, 2026.
^[5]El Universo, October 23, 2025.
^[6]International IDEA, November 2025; La Jornada, July 18, 2026.
^[7]El Universo, 15 de julio de 2026.
^[8]Primicias, 15 de julio de 2026.
^[9]La República, 17 de julio de 2026.
^[10]Qué Noticias, 8 de julio de 2026.
^[11]El Universo, 23 de octubre de 2025.
^[12]IDEA Internacional, noviembre de 2025; La Jornada, 18 de julio de 2026.

The post On Ecuador: When the Referees Join a Team appeared first on DSA International Committee.

On July 21, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chair General Dan Caine appeared before the Senate Appropriations Committee to ask for $87.6 billion in emergency supplemental funding for the war in Iran. This amount would add to the current funding of $839 billion found in the most recent budget and the $150 billion added last year in the Republicans’ “Big Beautiful Bill,” for a total budget of over $1 trillion.

Senators had reasonable questions and received clownish answers. Shouldn’t all of this be approved by Congress? (No.) What happened to the money we already gave you? (Those are for different, unrelated bombs.) How can Iran be killing soldiers when you said previously that we destroyed their missiles? (Iran has more, hidden missiles because “That’s what terror regimes would do.”) Why are we bombing Iran to stop their nuclear program if we already destroyed it? (“Iranians foolishly continued to attempt to pursue nuclear capabilities.”)

“We hear a different rationale for this war every few days,” said Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), vice chair of the committee. Pointing to the shifting objectives during this now five-month war, she said: 

“It was about preempting imminent threats which we now know did not exist. It was about regime change, then liberating the Iranian people. It was about destroying Iran’s nuclear program and its navy, and at one point it was about taking out its ballistic missiles […] Trump has even suggested the war is about taking Iran’s oil to ‘Make a fortune.’ And now the United States’ primary strategic objective seems to be to actually just reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which, of course, was fully open, toll-free, before this war began.”

Murray is also the only senator to note that the request includes unrelated items such as “Almost $1 billion for SOUTHCOM, nearly $1 billion to keep deploying the National Guard here in DC, and more than $1 billion for the southern border.”

These items being included make perfect sense under the current model of governance. Under a regime where funds appropriated by Congress can be withheld at-will by the executive, it doesn’t really matter what the mechanisms of funding are as long as it keeps flowing in the right directions. And subjugating brown people costs a lot of your money. Summed up a different way by Hegseth, “Every dollar appropriated to the Department of War will be focused on building the lethality of our joint forces and reinforcing peace through strength.”

Only one senator displayed the level of emotion I’d expect for a conversation about murder. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) spent her time haranguing the assembled warmongers and asking why we couldn’t be here mongering something else. “[New Yorkers] are seeing their healthcare bills rise because [of] massive cuts to medicaid. They’ve seen their grocery and gas bills rise, and this unpopular and unauthorized war abroad is a higher priority to this administration than their ability to feed their families and provide healthcare to their loved ones who are sick.”

Any amount of pushback given by this committee to the administration is tempered by the effusive praise multiple senators offered for the war and for alleged rapist Pete Hegseth.

“Secretary Hegseth,” Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-MS) said, “Thank you for being here and the amazing job that you’re doing. I have the utmost respect for you, your team, and what you’re accomplishing.”

Democratic socialists have little praise to offer anyone in this hearing. National DSA has passed resolutions calling for an end to all foreign wars, the closing of overseas bases, and ending sanctions on Iran. It is long past time for Americans to reject two parties equally supportive of overseas murder, even if one party (the Democrats) technically approves and funds that murder using proper procedure.

Will the Senate go on to support this package? One senator has no idea: Senator John Kennedy (R-LA). Because the emergency funding request also includes provisions for farm aid, sitting next to Hegseth throughout the hearing was Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins.

Kennedy mumbled his way through a series of stern but meaningless questions for Caine and Hegseth (occasionally pausing to stare intensely into open air), before turning to Rollins and engaging in a line of questioning involving “Other countries who grow oysters and shrimp in a ditch and shoot them full of antibiotics,” with the exact same seriousness as his questions about war.

Kennedy has no relation to the more famous Massachusetts Kennedys, but Senator Kennedy is the inheritor of a vast fortune built on slavery and sharecropping in Catahoula and Concordia parishes in his home state of Louisiana.  With this being the caliber of person in our legislature’s upper house, there is little reason for faith in a just outcome. Maybe we should just abolish the whole senate.

The post Craven Warmongers Beg the Senate for More of Your Money appeared first on Midwest Socialist.

By: Jason M, Jake S

WORCESTER – Teachers and staff organized under the Massachusetts Community College Council (MCCC) have been engaged in contract negotiations with the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education for the last few months. Despite Massachusetts offering free community college through the MassEducate program, faculty at community colleges across the state face conditions that harm their wellbeing. Low pay, food insecurity, and ever-increasing class sizes hurt faculty and prevent them from being able to teach their students. While community college presidents across the state regularly make more than $200,000 annually, community college faculty make the lowest average salary nationwide, according to a study conducted by the Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA). 

Nearly half of MCCC members struggle with food insecurity and most need a second job to pay their bills. Increases in the size of online classes by as much as 56% undermines existing protections in the Local QCC Distance Education agreement and severely hampers the ability of faculty and staff to offer students a quality education. 

The Massachusetts Board of Higher Education has not entertained a proposal from MCCC. Only three bargaining sessions have been held over a four-month period, during which the Board has tried to implement restrictions over rank-and-file MCCC members’ ability to attend, and changes to how union representatives are compensated for their time spent negotiating. The union has filed an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) over the latter.

Working Mass sat down with Caitlin B, an academic advisor and enrollment counselor, as well as secretary for the union’s QCC chapter (the Quinsigamond Community College Professional Association, or QCCPA), to talk about union members’ concerns.

Quotations used in this article have been edited for clarity and brevity.

Distraction, Delay, and Hostility

Salary, workload, and schedule flexibility are top concerns amongst QCCPA members. The Mass Board of Higher Ed, instead of entertaining proposals from the union, has forced negotiations to fixate around rules of engagement. Caitlin explained:

We haven’t proposed anything regarding these issues yet. So far, we’ve been working with management on establishing ground rules for bargaining. This has already been difficult to negotiate.

The Mass Board of Higher Education has also earned an Unfair Labor Practice charge from QCCPA early on by undermining compensation of the union’s bargaining team.

They don’t want us to be compensated, so we’ve been doing all of our bargaining outside of working hours. I’ve never done this before, but other people are like: ‘This is absurd.’

The school argues that rank-and-file union members should not be physically visible to the boss when they attend virtual bargaining sessions.

I’ve heard horror stories about bargaining, and so far I haven’t experienced anything that bad, but this year, management had some issues with silent representatives. Dues-paying members can silently attend bargaining sessions, and there’s this complaint about, should they be visible during the Zoom session, should they not be visible, it clogs things up, blah blah blah.

The Board of Higher Education hasn’t offered much detail to explain why seeing union members’ faces make them so uncomfortable during negotiations. Caitlin can only assume their intent.

The silent representatives are really important for us, because when we caucus in between bargaining sessions, they actually have information they can give to us that we wouldn’t necessarily know off the cuff. Management doesn’t want them there, they don’t want to look at people when they’re telling them: ‘No, you can’t get this, you can’t get that’, so that’s been the biggest issue for them right now.” 

A Real Sense of Ownership

When asked about what being in a union meant to her, Caitlin paused thoughtfully.

Without the union, we’d be at the mercy of whatever our employee decides what is best for us. When you work in a system with so many different components and types of employees, having proper representation is essential. 

Caitlin continued:

My coworkers have an unwavering dedication to their students. We work together on a mission to help our students get what they need, and at the community college level, our students may not be “traditional.” We are their advocates and support systems, and that is something worth preserving.

Caitlin reflected positively on rank-and-file engagement at QCC.

We’ve increased our membership a bit. We’ve got the MTA [Massachusetts Teachers Association, of which MCCC is an affiliate] noticing that and coming to our meetings every week, they’re really paying attention to how we’re doing things, which is really nice. So I think watching the change, watching people being more engaged in it, makes you want to be more engaged in it.

Caitlin in large part credited James L, president of the QCC chapter of MCCC and an active member of Worcester DSA who previously served on its Steering Committee, with this growth. “He quickly formed an organizing committee on campus, which exists at the statewide level, but usually locals don’t have one,” she explained.

I think once people started realizing, oh, we can actually do something with this, it’s not just a contract, it’s also action, you know? I think that’s really important.

Workers united can, in fact, demand a say in the place where their labor is bought and sold is why a strong, conscious labor movement is a central component to building working class power. Ownership unites the collective. When workers organize amongst themselves to confront a class enemy, they become the protagonists of the struggle they live through every day – to learn to think and act collectively, laying down the paving stones along the road to a better future.

Jason M and Jake S are members of Central Mass & Worcester DSA. They are contributing authors for Working Mass.

The post Mass Community College Faculty and Staff, Suffering Low Pay and Hostility, Face Off with Board of Higher Ed appeared first on Working Mass.

[[{“value”:”

By: Jason M, Jake S

WORCESTER – Teachers and staff organized under the Massachusetts Community College Council (MCCC) have been engaged in contract negotiations with the Massachusetts Board of Higher Education for the last few months. Despite Massachusetts offering free community college through the MassEducate program, faculty at community colleges across the state face conditions that harm their wellbeing. Low pay, food insecurity, and ever-increasing class sizes hurt faculty and prevent them from being able to teach their students. While community college presidents across the state regularly make more than $200,000 annually, community college faculty make the lowest average salary nationwide, according to a study conducted by the Massachusetts Teachers Association (MTA). 

Nearly half of MCCC members struggle with food insecurity and most need a second job to pay their bills. Increases in the size of online classes by as much as 56% undermines existing protections in the Local QCC Distance Education agreement and severely hampers the ability of faculty and staff to offer students a quality education. 

The Massachusetts Board of Higher Education has not entertained a proposal from MCCC. Only three bargaining sessions have been held over a four-month period, during which the Board has tried to implement restrictions over rank-and-file MCCC members’ ability to attend, and changes to how union representatives are compensated for their time spent negotiating. The union has filed an Unfair Labor Practice (ULP) over the latter.

Working Mass sat down with Caitlin B, an academic advisor and enrollment counselor, as well as secretary for the union’s QCC chapter (the Quinsigamond Community College Professional Association, or QCCPA), to talk about union members’ concerns.

Quotations used in this article have been edited for clarity and brevity.

Distraction, Delay, and Hostility

Salary, workload, and schedule flexibility are top concerns amongst QCCPA members. The Mass Board of Higher Ed, instead of entertaining proposals from the union, has forced negotiations to fixate around rules of engagement. Caitlin explained:

We haven’t proposed anything regarding these issues yet. So far, we’ve been working with management on establishing ground rules for bargaining. This has already been difficult to negotiate.

The Mass Board of Higher Education has also earned an Unfair Labor Practice charge from QCCPA early on by undermining compensation of the union’s bargaining team.

They don’t want us to be compensated, so we’ve been doing all of our bargaining outside of working hours. I’ve never done this before, but other people are like: ‘This is absurd.’

The school argues that rank-and-file union members should not be physically visible to the boss when they attend virtual bargaining sessions.

I’ve heard horror stories about bargaining, and so far I haven’t experienced anything that bad, but this year, there were some issues with silent representatives. Dues-paying members can silently attend bargaining sessions, and there’s this complaint about, should they be visible during the Zoom session, should they not be visible, it clogs things up, blah blah blah.

The Board of Higher Education hasn’t offered much detail to explain why seeing union members’ faces make them so uncomfortable during negotiations. Caitlin can only assume their intent.

The silent representatives are really important for us, because when we caucus in between bargaining sessions, they actually have information they can give to us that we wouldn’t necessarily know off the cuff. Management doesn’t want them there, they don’t want to look at people when they’re telling them: ‘No, you can’t get this, you can’t get that’, so that’s been the biggest issue for them right now.” 

A Real Sense of Ownership

When asked about what being in a union meant to her, Caitlin paused thoughtfully.

Without the union, we’d be at the mercy of whatever our employee decides what is best for us. When you work in a system with so many different components and types of employees, having proper representation is essential. 

Caitlin continued:

My coworkers have an unwavering dedication to their students. We work together on a mission to help our students get what they need, and at the community college level, our students may not be “traditional.” We are their advocates and support systems, and that is something worth preserving.

Caitlin reflected positively on rank-and-file engagement at QCC.

We’ve increased our membership a bit. We’ve got the MTA [Massachusetts Teachers Association, of which MCCC is an affiliate] noticing that and coming to our meetings every week, they’re really paying attention to how we’re doing things, which is really nice. So I think watching the change, watching people being more engaged in it, makes you want to be more engaged in it.

Caitlin in large part credited James L, president of the QCC chapter of MCCC and an active member of Worcester DSA who previously served on its Steering Committee, with this growth. “He quickly formed an organizing committee on campus, which exists at the statewide level, but usually locals don’t have one,” she explained.

I think once people started realizing, oh, we can actually do something with this, it’s not just a contract, it’s also action, you know? I think that’s really important.

Workers united can, in fact, demand a say in the place where their labor is bought and sold is why a strong, conscious labor movement is a central component to building working class power. Ownership unites the collective. When workers organize amongst themselves to confront a class enemy, they become the protagonists of the struggle they live through every day. They learn to think and act collectively, laying down the paving stones along the road to a better future. One where the working class is in full control of society, not the bosses and the capitalists.

Jason M and Jake S are members of Central Mass and Worcester DSA. They are contributing authors for Working Mass..

The post Community College Faculty and Staff, Suffering Low Pay and Board Hostility, Fight for a Contract appeared first on Working Mass.

“}]] 

“Election day he shouted ‘a socialist for mayor’

The comrade got elected, he happy was for fair

But after the election he got an awful shock

A great big socialistic bull did rap him on the block.

And Comrade Block did sob,

‘I helped him to his job.’”

(”Mr. Block” by Joe Hill)

Truck of Thrones

One evening in late March 2023, a church leader and I were standing out in the cold dark, waiting for Brandon Johnson. Suddenly an amazing vehicle appeared: A crusty old delivery truck that had been transformed with color, lights, a magnificent video screen, and a killer sound system. Inside were two magnificently gaudy thrones. Across the front was a website address that began “HOUSEMUSICTRUCKING.

The chariot of Chicago house music legend DJ Farley had become a fixture of the Brandon Johnson campaign. It was part of the advance team that preceded him to events. It was also one of the most Chicago things ever. 

The truck was so fitting, because house music is an essential ingredient of what Brandon Johnson regularly describes as “the soul of Chicago.” For those that don’t know,  house music is an intensely strange and wonderful genre of electronic dance music that was brewed out of Chicago’s empty industrial real estate, marginalized identities, crates of old soul records, innovation, and intense spiritual dedication to fun.

Since Johnson was elected, I have reflected on that vehicle as the symbol of all our hopes and dreams. It seemed like this crusty old delivery truck was transformed into a beacon of joy and hope was a personification of Chicago. It felt like we were putting Brandon in the driver’s seat to carry us into a glorious new future. Brandon said frequently on the campaign trail that he was going to bring the people to “the 5th floor,” and we wanted to get on that party bus with him.

“This Ain’t No Party, This Ain’t No Disco, This Ain’t No Foolin’ Around”

Unfortunately, Chicago is not a party bus. It’s more like an aircraft carrier which has a large crew and is very hard to turn around. And there are a number of different factions among that crew.

One was the long-time staff left over from the patronage systems run by both the elder and junior Mayor Daleys, but the folks left over from that era guard the knowledge of where the light switches are. So you can either work with them or sit in the dark. 

There were a lot of out-of-touch fake progressives left over from the the Lightfoot administration who refused to get on board with being accountable to the people of Chicago.

On top of all of this, Johnson had to onboard the multitudes he brought with him, sometimes having to make grim decisions about who gets off the dock or even out of the water.

An old machine faction of the Chicago city council attempted to put together the votes to override Johnson’s ability to pick committee chairs before he even took command. And that incident may have forced him to cut a deal with and offer political concessions and other goodies to some of the more transactional alderpersons.

I’m not here to make excuses, but the Brandon Johnson and Zohran Mamdani administrations have little to do with the private individuals Brandon Johnson or Zohran Mamdani. Brandon and I both came out of the radical end of the labor movement, and if you’ve been in that scene more than five minutes, you’ve heard the phrase “don’t third-party the union.” That means the members are the union, and the members are solely responsible for the health and performance of the union. To use another metaphor, when I worked as a union rep, I described myself, the elected leaders, other union staff, and the office as a lawnmower. If I leave my lawnmower out in the rain and it gets rusty so my grass gets high, it’s not the lawnmower’s fault. Even if I can sharpen up my blades, fix my engine, and start mowing, it’s going to be rough to mow tall grass. But if I can get the grass down to a reasonable level, it’s going to be a lot easier to maintain.

Another way to say this is that the Johnson administration is the product of a movement that further broke the Chicago Machine. And as the old saying goes, “you break it, you buy it.” So where do we go from here? Do we try to fix the Machine? Do we break it more and attempt to dismantle it altogether? Do we drive it around with the bumper hanging off until we get somewhere? Do we trade up for a newer one? 

Brandon Johnson himself has very little input into this decision. Actually, no individual makes these decisions. The power in a coalition comes from the participation of its constituent groups. The leaders are the leaders exclusively because they have followers. It’s up to movement to inspire its participants to make good use of the progress we have forged. 

My central message is that we are not done after we have played our role in an election. There is more to do. Chicago activists have thrown around the word “co-governance” as a utopian idea of how much we can collaborate with an office that is not set up for our values, no matter who occupies it. One movement leader, shortly before going to work for the Johnson administration, said it best. “We have not achieved co-governance,” they said; “we have changed the conditions under which we are organizing.”

The Wealth of Swamps

“Chicago” is an indigenous word that roughly translates as “stinky onion” – the garlic weed swamp. I’ve always imagined French explorers arriving on the banks of the Des Plaines River in Joliet (a block from my old apartment) and indigenous people selling them on the idea of leaving them alone for now to continue onto “the chicago,” just like a realtor today might try to rebrand a troubled neighborhood they’re attempting to gentrify. 

However, Chicago was not just a swamp, but a swampy portage path. At the dawn of history, in the early days of boating, if you wanted to travel the continent by water, an important step was to get from Lake Michigan to the Des Plaines River. The Chicago wetlands provided you the chance to do that, depending on the water levels, by paddling part of the way rather than carrying your boat. Archer Avenue in particular, but also Route 66, Ogden Avenue, and the I-55, are the legacy of the swamp path. It’s one of the world’s great primal roads. This pathway led to the canal and a port. That caused the original train lines to link here. The trains and waterways brought the roads and freeways. The cowboys brought the livestock from the Great Plains so it could be processed in Sandburg’s “hog butcher for the world.” 

And so all the real wealth comes through Chicago. While New York and Boston have a lot of money, you can’t eat money, except by owning a lot of land, debt, and commerce elsewhere. Why should we let these pieces of paper control our lives? California and Florida have produce, but that rots if you can’t move it in time. 

So how do we access the wealth that flows through Chicago? Who has it now and how do we get hold of it for the people’s needs?

The Room with Some People  

A mayoral election is one small battle in the much longer conflict between those who live in the region and those who own the region. I was at one of many Brandon Johnson victory parties that the Mayor-elect did not attend. The director of the community-based 501(c4) organization hosting the party was nervously texting Brandon’s entourage. “He’s in a room with some people,” the director said. 

I perked up my ears. I’ve heard Chicago community leaders lay out the myth of a ‘smoke-filled room’ like this. The people who own Chicago, it’s theorized, take the mayor in the room and say ‘We don’t work for you. You work for us.’ These capitalists then say what they want from the mayor and the city, and what they can do to the mayor and the city if they don’t get it. Debt can be made due immediately. Industries can be shut down. This is what we call a capital strike: capitalists deliberately shutting down vital infrastructure or tanking the economy to sabotage a left-wing leader or thwart reform.

Several South Side Walmarts were closed down between the election and the swearing-in ceremony. The struggle over government actions and subsidies that helped build these stores had been one of the great struggles (and defeats) of the Chicago social justice movement during the Richard M. Daley administration. Walmart claimed the stores were losing money even though the stores were always full, and the company refused demands to show us the numbers. Many of us saw this as nothing short of a capital strike against the mayor-elect.

First We Get the Money

The people in the back room intentionally obscure themselves from us, but we must track them down and reclaim our wealth. Almost all of our demands cost money.  The budget address is way too late to think about how we’re going to pay for the changes we want. The day after the city budget is done, we need to start a campaign for revenue in the next one. 

Ready or Not, Here We Come

“We should not be on the fifth floor, and I’m speaking my whole heart…we were not ready, because we haven’t been in government long enough to know how government really runs.” 

(Alderwoman Jeanette Taylor, December 2023)

When one is union staff or leadership,  it is tricky to encounter a worksite leader who has bad feelings about the union. Often these feelings are a mix of legitimate grievances and unrealistic expectations. When I was union staff, I would always volunteer to go to sites that were accused of being mad at the union. I can work with any type of anger, but it’s hard to move workers who have fully checked out. 

I tell such leaders the story of the Caucus of Rank & File Educators (CORE), which is a political faction inside Chicago Teachers Union Local 1 (CTU). When I first met Brandon Johnson in 2013, he was chair of the black caucus of CORE. 

The sad truth is that most union members in the U.S. do not vote in union elections and likely struggle to remember the name of their union, let alone have any understanding of its structure. Many members, I tell the frustrated stewards, get mad about this issue or another, find some untapped votes and, boom, they’re in office. You could do that, I tell them. But the problem is that the failings of union officers are not always personal failings. The pressures of the office can crack even the most dedicated organizers. Many elected union leaders are not prepared for the pressures of what they’re going to face, and they become much like the leaders they ran against.

CORE, however, did not seek control of the union until they had power and knew how to wield it. They spent years connecting to their profession and what the school means – not just to teachers, but to the entire community and the public good. They recruited the late Karen Lewis, one of the most authentic and effective leaders in Chicago history, even if she didn’t come from exactly the same political background or traditions as some of the caucus’s founders. CTU won the 2013 strike because Rahm Emmanuel could not split asunder what years of careful thought, exploration, and intense relationship building with the community had wrought. 

But Alderwoman Taylor, one of the Chicago city council’s most prophetic voices, was right. We were not prepared for a progressive mayor. We did not have the luxury of time and preparation. We took a shot from the other side of the court and were amazed by the swish, and we thought that finally, after lifetimes of heartbreak, we might manifest all our wishes. 

Perhaps Alderwoman Taylor is right about one other thing too: Perhaps this was not the type of power we needed to build. In the 1980s, the late Harold Washington was Chicago’s most progressive and first black mayor. Washington’s first term was frustrated at every turn by a racist white voting bloc called the “Vrodolyak 29” during a period referred to as “the Council Wars.” During this period, a 29 members of the city council voted down everything Washington proposed.  Perhaps we should have built the “Taylor 29” before we looked for another potential Harold Washington. 

I’ve spent a lot of time with folks I’ve met on the South Side. They don’t talk much about whether Epstein was murdered, but they will talk your ear off about all the ways they know Harold was.

But what do we do with this revelation from Alderwoman Taylor? Yes, it’s better to build a plane on the ground before you’re in the air. We didn’t have the luxury of years of preparation, so here we are. We need to find the energy to build multiple vehicles of power at the same time.

Chicago Reader columnist Ben Joravsky, the dean of Chicago movement journalism, regularly points out that Chicago doesn’t like nice mayors. He lays out how often we’ve rewarded the bad behavior of our past mayors with defense and support.

We also complain about our mayors being too controlling, but we don’t seem to know how to act when someone shares control and responsibility with others. During the 2024 process to pass the city budget, both supporters and detractors would comment that Johnson had weakened the office of the mayor by “losing control” of the budget process. My response to this commentary was always, “Isn’t that what folks elected him for?” My sense was that he laid the worst-case-scenario budget on the table, and then he made the city council own their own efforts at improving it. I thought that was a genius move. If we’re all invited to the 5th floor, doesn’t that indicate shared responsibility?

“Johnson has fiercely defended his handling of the negotiations over the city’s 2025 spending plan, repeatedly referring to himself as the ‘collaborator in chief’ and disputing suggestions that City Hall has been engulfed in chaos, even as he called on members of the city council to ‘grow up’ and stop throwing tantrums…not only did Johnson’s original budget proposal ask alderpeople to put their political futures at risk by voting for the largest property tax hike since 2016 and the second-largest in Chicago history, but it offered nearly nothing in return for city council members to point to when speaking to angry Chicagoans.”

(WTTW: “Chicago City Council Narrowly OKs Johnson’s $17.1B Budget That Hikes Taxes by $165M”, Heather Cherone, December 16, 2024)

Experience Newark at O’Hare

We are electing nice guys who want to be accessible to everyone, but that’s the same thing as being accessible to no one. There is too much noise and not enough signal in this approach. It causes a lack of transparency – or, at least, there’s no transparency about who is getting the access that matters. It’s nice to get attention, but it’s more vital to know early on about what logistics facility, quantum computing campus, stadium, etc., might get built on top of your neighborhood. A picture with the mayor is nowhere near as exciting as having a point person that you know will bring your issues to the mayor. There needs to be an organized way to get ideas, concerns, and information to not just the mayor but the administration. 

In the documentary Punch 9 for Harold Washington, there’s a scene where folks tell the story of how many ‘no-show’ city jobs they found after Harold was sworn in – corrupt arrangements in which city officials gave jobs to supporters and friends that didn’t require them to do meaningful work. So there’s a real reason to make sure people are at City Hall performing their jobs. But we also need to make sure that the real jobs are sustainable. My friends who work at City Hall look so dead inside. We need to get them fresh air, but we also need to maintain a consistent presence in all neighborhoods throughout the city. If too much governing is happening in one building and not in the neighborhoods, it will never be satisfying.

There are so many coalitions pursuing so many separate campaigns, and they’re all trying to get through the city council as quickly as possible. Progressive alders take meeting after meeting with different groups wanting them to champion similar but different causes, with no clear mandate about what to tackle first. The movement needs to pick what will have the biggest impact and has the most organized people behind it.

But the administration also needs to communicate on their end. If a community leader has spent their lives developing civic infrastructure in their neighborhood, I should not be the one telling them substantial news about their neighborhood; neither should they first hear about it from the media. In fact, they should know about what’s coming, because they should be involved in shaping it. There needs to be a legion of staff who are constantly listening to and engaging the ‘grasstops,’ who, through the moral authority of their hard work, run the civic life of the city. By ‘grasstops’ I mean the block captains, civic associations, campaign volunteers, church deacons, etc. – everyone that is putting in the effort to make the community life of Chicago happen. We can’t knock on every door, but every neighborhood has people that almost every household engages with. 

Not Here for Friendship

Some social justice activists want to elect mayors and support them by never criticizing them publicly and waiting on them for direction. Some on the left want to constantly form a black-and-white assessment of a leader and either blindly follow or viciously attack them. The situation is much more complex than that. 

For any of these officials to have successful administrations, the coalitions that elected them need to temper these tendencies. Movements need to independently continue to make their demands. But also, we need to have a reasonable understanding of and strategy around the real limits of the office and the tough decisions that need to be made. We should not be afraid to be far ahead of the mayor but we should not consume our own tail by having unrealistic expectations of the office. 

We do not live in a world of what is right and just. We live in a world of what is possible with the power we have built. We also do not need to burden the mayor with making decisions that we should be making, and we should not hesitate to be aggressively useful to the administration. We should not hesitate to make moves that perhaps the mayor cannot make as easily.

I know one organizer who jumped into being aggressively useful as soon as the election was over. If they knew something, they said something. If someone was angry at the Mayor, they helped his office know about and understand it. Pretty soon, calling them was on the to-do list of new staff. The administration has a lot to pay attention to, and both the organizer and the administration would have both been weakened if they had waited to be asked.

Everybody Everybody Sent

“Is a tractor bad? Is the power that turns the long furrows wrong? If this tractor were ours it would be good – not mine, but ours.” 

(John Steinbeck, The Grapes of Wrath)

After the election, a number of voices disparagingly and increasingly referred to the CTU and  IFT/AFT Local 1 as “the New Machine.”  The old Chicago political machine was the transactional and tightly controlled system in which a small number of people exchanged their political support for city jobs and other perks. Our trauma from living under the old machine can easily make us cynical about any machine or system of organization.

Ultimately, whatever your politics, that type of machine is stronger than people who do the minimum amount for the maximum benefit and who are too afraid of the boss to act independently. Hopefully, we will put more into building an open, transformational machine that delivers for the region’s people by making deep structural changes, and less into critiquing individual candidates.

The post This Ain’t No Party Bus: Movement Lessons From the Brandon Johnson Administration appeared first on Midwest Socialist.

DSA stands unwaveringly against Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, and the billionaire class’ attempts to repress and silence our movement to end the United States’ genocidal blockade against Cuba. From NSPM-7 to Marco Rubio’s “Cuba Report” released by the State Department, we know that they lack any legal basis to respond to the democratic power of the working class. They cannot fathom the idea that the multi-racial, international working class can join forces and organize together organically, free from the influence of any foreign government. We are being depicted as fanatics for building a world where people live in peace, safe from bombs; where no child goes hungry; where no family has to worry that their lives will be ripped apart by ICE; and where no one has to suffer from lack of housing or healthcare. They depict us as such because they are afraid that our ideas are not fringe demands. These are the demands that millions of Americans have already committed to fighting for at the ballot box and in the streets.

Despite Rubio’s attempt to smear us, his report admits that DSA does not organize on behalf of the Cuban Government, only of its own accord.

In DSA, organizing of our own accord means fulfilling the democratically-made decisions of our members. Our internationalism is rooted in the principles of our members who channel their support for socialism around the world into campaigns that confront imperialism and transcend the walls it constructs between the workers of the world. Through this difficult period, our Cuba Solidarity organizing has remained successful and we are committed to continuing our organizing against the blockade of Cuba by the United States and to assist the Cuban people against the ongoing humanitarian catastrophe that has ensued.

As Black and brown socialists gain political power and mainstream visibility, it’s not lost on us that the Trump administration is attempting to paint anti-racist organizing as a coordinated plot against the United States, rather than an organic expression of resistance to centuries of oppression. This is not new. We know from history that our Black, Native, and immigrant neighbors are the first to be targeted. We reject the report’s characterization of the movements for Democracy and Black Liberation as foreign influenced and condemn these claims as racist and absurd. Our comrades have expressed their constitutionally-protected rights to express, organize, and assemble and we stand in unwavering solidarity with them as they continue to do so.

Movements for Democracy, Socialism, and Black Liberation are always intentionally smeared as dangerous because they are threats to the status quo — a status quo where trillionaires exist while the masses struggle to afford groceries, where workers struggle to breathe as they are forced to toil through increasingly dangerous heatwaves and toxic wildfire smoke. This report is an attempt to scapegoat Cuba as some puppet-master behind the strife here in the United States, it is a tool for fulfilling Rubio and Trump’s personal goals of regime change, no matter the human cost.

As Trump’s minions weaponize state resources against our movements, they show that there is no law, domestic or international, strong enough alone to protect our freedom of speech and assembly. The only way to defeat this tyrannical regime is by building a mass movement in solidarity with all working people around the world suffering under the boot of US imperialism; a movement powerful enough to demand a new world, one our children deserve to inherit.

!Cuba Si, Bloqueo No!

Solidarity,

Democratic Socialists of America

The post DSA Statement on the New State Department Report on Cuba appeared first on Democratic Socialists of America (DSA).

ROC DSA Steering Committee – August 10, 2026

On August 11, 2026, the Monroe County Legislature will vote whether to accept $161,285 for Operation Stonegarden, a grant funding local law enforcement participation in a federal border security program tied to Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Legislators must vote NO. Coordination with the agencies carrying out Trump’s anti-immigrant agenda is complicity.

Operation Stonegarden would increase cooperation and intelligence sharing between local law enforcement and immigration agents, and fund surveillance technology like license plate readers. These are the same agents who are infiltrating our community and deporting our neighbors. We cannot empower them through increased material support and data.

Supporters of this legislation say it’s the same money the County has approved for years. Setting aside whether it was ever appropriate to accept this grant, it is undeniable that this time is different. Removal orders neared 500,000 in 2025, up by more than 56% from the year prior, and more than 65,000 people are currently in ICE detention, the majority of whom have no criminal record. The racial content of Trump’s policies is clear, and the County must refuse to be connected with those responsible for their enactment.

We are disappointed by Democrats who voted this legislation out of committee on July 28. They have had the opportunity to reflect, and we hope they have found the moral courage to vote NO on August 11. We applaud those who have demonstrated commitment to human rights by consistently opposing this legislation.

Opposition to Operation Stonegarden is just the start. ROC DSA calls on our representatives to support policies that ensure all County residents are safe from these anti-immigrant attacks. The County must formally bar cooperation with immigration enforcement, and use our economic leverage to divest from companies supporting Trump’s agenda. Which way, resistance or complicity?

The post Coordination is Complicity: Reject Operation Stonegarden first appeared on Rochester Red Star.

Learn how federal laws like Title VII, the ADA, and the PDA protect workers from workplace discrimination, and discover why collective organizing remains crucial for labor justice.

The post Key federal workplace rights against discrimination and harassment appeared first on EWOC.