Tax The Rich is a seasoned Portland DSA working group where we think about how to move money and power from the rich to the working class. We’re a rag-tag group of amateurs and academics – all levels of expertise (or lack thereof) are welcome! We have several main categories of the work we do: wealth taxes, work on the city budget, supporting coalition campaigns, and tax education.

So far, our wealth tax work has been remarkably successful! In 2021-2022, we saw the first $208 million dollars flow from the wealthy to fund universal preschool. Our universal preschool campaign, which we worked on beginning in 2018 and through the passage of the Preschool For All measure in November of 2020, is good for kids, families, and workers. Through our work on the preschool campaign, we learned that although the tax code is famously skewed in favor of the wealthy, given the democratic choice, Multnomah County voters are more than ready to change that.

We’re also not slowing down in our ballot measure and taxation policy work! We’re already working on our next wealth tax, which would tax extreme “intangible” wealth, which includes stocks and bonds. This type of wealth is currently only taxed when it’s sold, or sometimes through the estate/inheritance tax, which means that the wealthy hold onto their money tax-free. That’s not very fair when the rest of us pay taxes on our wealth via income taxes and property taxes.

Our proposed intangible wealth tax (or an “extreme wealth tax”, as we’ve taken to calling it),  would be a 1% tax on extreme wealth over 10 million dollars, bringing  in about 2.6 billion dollars in revenue annually. But, we still have work to do: most importantly, we’re still trying to figure out what the tax should fund. Our research crew has discussed what $10 million would mean for housing, preschool and education, mental health and addiction services, and more, but we’re still mulling any and all possibilities. If you have ideas of what this tax should fund, please reach out and tell us about them!

When we’re not coming up with new taxes, we’re working on other projects. One of our long-standing traditions is advocating around the city budget. Each spring, we do our best to let Portlanders know what’s in the proposed budget, and encourage people to take action. We make shareable and easily digestible social media content, create phone scripts that Portlanders can use to call the councilors, as well as template emails for the phone-shy. Some people even get empowered to testify in front of the council!

We can’t afford to step away from the budget work this year. Over the last few years, our conservative city council has decided to spend our hard-earned tax dollars in ways that make the Portland Police Bureau and the Portland Business Alliance very happy. With this year’s even more conservative city council, the budget is probably going to reflect their cozy relationships, rather than finding ways to serve the actual needs of Portlanders. Join us for our annual deep dive into the budget, and brainstorm ways to tell our council to fund a budget that serves all of us, not just the rich and powerful.

Of course, the fight towards economic justice is too big to do alone, and so we’re proud to support all fights that work towards a more just Oregon. We helped our friends at Eviction Representation For All by developing a capital gains tax that will fully fund legal representation for all renters in eviction court, as well as other tenant services. We’ll be doing our part to ensure that their measure is successful on the ballot this spring. Additionally, we’re finding ways to support OPAL’s very cool fareless Trimet campaign, which you can learn more about here.

Lastly, our educational work is central to much of what we do. Our goal across our social media pages is to make tax policy interesting and maybe even fun. We mostly do that through social media content: we’re on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter! After all, it’s hard to convince people that we need to change tax policy unless they understand how and why it’s broken in the first place.

If any of this work sounds interesting to you, we’d love to have you! We’re really excited about our February social, which is at 8pm on Thursday, February 9th at Worker’s Tap: come hang out! Of course, we also have our regular meetings every second Thursday of the month at 6:30pm. These meetings are hybrid, so you can join us in person at the IWW, or virtually over Zoom, whichever works better for your schedule.  If you have any questions or comments for us, feel free to reach out to co-chairs Emerson or Lauren on Mattermost, or email us at taxtherichpdx@gmail.com!

CW: Graphic descriptions of police violence The footage of Tyre Nichols being killed at the hands of Memphis PD captures the murderous function of police in all its brutality. The […]

The post Houston DSA Statement on the Murder of Tyre Nichols appeared first on Houston DSA.

Drag is an art with deep roots in New York City’s queer communities of color that has much to offer to all people who are interested in liberating themselves from traditional and patriarchal ideas of gender. That’s part of why it’s become a target of the organized far-right both here in NYC and nationally, with public libraries and other community venues facing protests over their regularly offered drag performances and story hours. Local politicians have also experienced far-right threats for merely expressing support for drag. On tonight’s edition of Revolutions per Minute, we’re live with Drag Story Hour NYC storyteller Oliver and  organizer and parent Desiree to discuss the many aspects of drag, and how New Yorkers have come together to reject the far-right threat and show the beauty and power of queer community.  

To learn more about Drag Story Hour NYC, visit dshnyc.org. 

January 17, 2023

The Charlotte Metro Democratic Socialists of America steering committee calls on the CATS bus system contractor RATP DEV USA to accept CATS workers’ collective bargaining demands.

Over the last few months of negotiation, CATS’s contractor has been trying to push a raw deal on bus operators. The company is threatening to cut pensions, remove dependents from their health insurance coverage, and ignore bus operator’s safety concerns. After years of pandemic and inflation it’s unconscionable that an employer would threaten to stop covering medical expenses for loved ones, and pretend a raise below inflation would make up for this. 

The bus operators have voted 254-14 to strike, which may begin as early as February 6th if the company continues to ignore their workers’ concerns. This strike will undeniably inconvenience many people who depend on public transit. We are disappointed that CATS and many local media sources have framed this as the fault of the workers. The workers are going on strike to defend the benefits they currently have and win the dignity we all deserve. It’s the company’s  focus on profits over their workers that is threatening to hurt riders.
As climate change increasingly threatens society, we need to do everything we can to cut back on emissions. This includes investing in our public transportation and the workers who operate it. If we let our city and its contractor keep mistreating the workers and families that keep the buses running, we’re going to struggle to find enough workers to keep up with the transit expansions we’ll need to avoid the worst of climate change.

We stand with our bus operators and their authorization to strike. A win for them is a win for all of us. It’s a win for public transportation, a win against climate change, and most importantly, a win against capitalist exploitation.

Solidarity Forever!

Charlotte Metro Democratic Socialists of America Steering Committee

By Michael Sebastian

Parker students marched with teachers and DSA members to Markham Elementary School last year to protest the closure of their school. (Photo: Stephanie Hung)

On January 11, Oakland’s educators and the community scored a signal victory in their years-long fight to end the closure and privatization of public schools. Within days of being seated on the school board, two new members endorsed by the Oakland Education Association, Valarie Bachelor and Jennifer Brouhard, joined a 4-3 majority to overturn last year’s school closure plan.

The closures faced mass opposition from parents, teachers and students, prompting protests and packed town halls. More than 2,000 attended last year’s virtual school board meeting on February 9, when the board voted to approve the closures. Public comments were unanimously opposed, arguing that the closures fell disproportionately on low-income, majority-black districts in Oakland, and were not needed in the face of a record budget surplus in California and a district superintendent with a base salary of $294,000. “OUSD has had a pattern of targeting schools with black and brown students populations for closures, effectively balancing the budget on the backs of our most marginalized students,” said Kampala Taiz-Rancifer, an Oakland teacher and OEA vice-president. “It has caused generations of harm.” The vote by the previous school board further eroded trust in a board seen as dominated by charter-school interests, setting the stage for the replacement of several board members in the 2022 elections.

This month’s vote reversing the closure plan saves five elementary schools that were slated to close this year: Brookfield, Carl B. Munck, Grass Valley, Horace Mann, and Korematsu Discovery Academy. In addition, the middle school grades at Hillcrest K8 will be preserved. The vote does not undo last year’s closure of Parker and Community Day elementary, and La Escuelita’s middle school. 

Manufactured Crises Pave the Way for Charters

Despite California’s chronic underfunding of public education, the debt piled onto OUSD when the state put it in receivership in 2003, and chronic deficits since then, the closure of public schools is not the only solution to fiscal woes. The crux of the problem is that the district is spending the money it does have on the wrong things: too many administrators and consultants who are not supporting teachers and students. As Majority observed in 2019, “OUSD spends $30 million more on its central office than other comparable school districts in California. In the 2014-15 school year, if OUSD had reduced its central office spending to the comparison group average, it could have freed up $14 million.”

In fact, closing schools is a false solution. Districts receive per-pupil state funding for the number of students attending, so the more students that the district cedes to private and charter schools, the less money it receives for public schools. By closing public schools, the district only encourages parents to seek alternatives since their child’s own school could be next on the chopping block. Oakland has become a “charter boomtown” according to one KQED report, and in the decade after 2000 the number of charters “more than tripled”. But charters have the option of picking children that do better in school and have less need for support. This leaves public schools in a self-perpetuating cycle, with more high-needs students and fewer resources to support them. Schools then have to cut back on materials and extracurricular activities, which further incentivizes families to leave.

OEA Fights Back

The Oakland Education Association, the union representing Oakland’s public school teachers, made its opposition to school closures a centerpiece of its seven-day strike in 2019. “For decades a grassroots movement in Oakland has fought against the forces of privatization for equity, local control, and well resourced neighborhood public schools,” said OEA president Keith Brown. “The power of this collective effort grew when community and labor joined OEA in our 2019 strike.” 

Brown noted that the strike “brought many improvements for students and re-energized our fight for education justice in Oakland.”  Among those improvements was a brief moratorium on school closures and charter school expansion, and a contract provision that required the district to give OEA and the community a year’s advance notice of its plans to shutter more schools to allow for full community engagement before a decision is made.

Last February, when the district violated that provision, the struggle continued to grow. Teachers and the community organized a week of action against school closures in February, including a mass rally and march, as two teachers at Westlake middle school held a hunger strike. 

These actions culminated in a one-day unfair labor practice strike on April 29 by OEA teachers protesting the district’s breach of the notice provision in their contract. 

Then, as Election Day approached, the California Department of Justice opened up a probe into Oakland’s school closures for potential violation of student’s civil rights, driven in part by a complaint filed by OEA. 

Winning Change at the Ballot Box and in the Bargaining Campaign

But the union’s efforts to protect Oakland’s public schools didn’t stop there. After a disappointing meeting in June in which the school board failed to reverse its decision, organizing efforts shifted to the school board election in November. 

OEA endorsed three candidates, Jennifer Brouhard, Valarie Bachelor, and Pecolia Manigo, who ran on a platform that included reversing the closures. Brouhard and Bachelor won their elections, shifting the balance of power on the board and culminating in this month’s 4-3 vote to reverse the closures. At the emergency board meeting, Bachelor called on “every single board member sitting here today to approve this resolution to make sure that we stop the harm that we’ve already caused our families and make sure that we support these school sites moving forward.” She noted that, “as a Parker Elementary School community member, I saw the devastating impact of the school closures on our community and I don’t want that to happen across the city, especially in East Oakland.”

OEA president Brown credits the reversal of the school-closure decision to “the people power of Oakland,” and he sees the fight of students, families, workers and community for “for equity, local control, and increased resources prioritizing students and families” continuing to grow. “The fight continues this spring as Oakland educators organize to win a contract that addresses the crisis in educator salaries and supports schools that are safe, stable, and racially just.”

As it begins bargaining over a new contract, OEA has put forward a “Common Good” proposal to diversify the curriculum, address racial disparities, and protect our public schools from closure. This plan calls for reinvestment in the Community School model, which has been shown to be a successful alternative to school closures, and received over $4 billion in new state funding over the past two years. The OEA bargaining proposal also outlines a set of guidelines to reallocate resources, consult with the community, and do a thorough analysis before any school closure takes place. Charter schools that do not meet AB1505 regulations would also be returned to OUSD. 

“This victory has been a long journey!,” reflected OEA second vice president Taiz-Rancifer. “Today we need to remember there is not one sole hero in this story. We need to acknowledge all the work done by so many advocates, organizers, parents, educators, and students who have put their hearts on the line and helped us get to this point. Today, we must remember harm caused to many families, school staff, and educators that have been affected by closures. Now and in the future we must stay vigilant because this is a victory in a larger fight against privatization in Oakland.”

Michael Sebastian is a member of the steering committee of East Bay DSA.

Member Bruce Nissen details his thoughts on what hurdles must be overcome to build broad support for socialism.

Polls show that socialism has a more positive image in the U.S. today than it did in the second half of the 20th Century. Nevertheless, support is still at only thirty six percent (36%) and sixty percent (60%) view socialism negatively according to a 2022 Pew Research Poll. Capitalism is much more popular, with fifty seven percent (57%) favorable and thirty nine percent (39%) unfavorable.

There are major differences among distinctive groups within these overall figures. Democrats and Independents are more likely to be favorable toward socialism while Republicans are extremely unlikely to have this view. Even more extreme differences are evident by age: young people under 30 are much more likely to be favorable to socialism than are those older than 30.

Considering that socialism has always been either somewhat marginal or extremely marginal in American life throughout history, these figures are fairly encouraging. Nevertheless, if we are to make socialism a major force in American politics and ultimately a governing power, we have a long way to go in convincing people that our favored economic and political system will improve their lives overall.

The DSA needs to increase in size tenfold and the larger socialist current in the country also needs to expand greatly. What are the roadblocks to this happening? There are many, and I cannot hope to address them all here. But I do want to look at one that has led me to conclude that we should always (1) describe ourselves as “democratic socialists,” not merely socsialists; (2) clearly distinguish a socialist economy from a completely centrally planned “command” economy; and (3) avoid public displays of Soviet-era symbols and language from the so-called “Communist” countries such as the Soviet Union and China. I arrived at these conclusions due to a couple of recent conversations.

I was discussing with an acquaintance the sorry state of housing in St. Petersburg. We were commenting on how unbelievable it was that people were being forced to live in their cars in the richest country in the world. I made the comment, “That’s capitalism.” He immediately came back with, “No, it’s greed.” I said, “Same thing. Capitalism is a system built around greed.” Then he said that the people leading socialist governments seemed just as greedy as those leading capitalist ones. It became apparent that his picture of socialism meant a country led by an authoritarian leader or party that hoarded all the power and much of the wealth in that country through their control of the government. While he was not wedded to capitalism and saw it as flawed, he viewed the historical alternative as no better and probably less free.

A second instance: I was talking with a man who was helping me install a new ceiling in the back room of my house. He was originally from Cuba; his father was Russian and his mother was Cuban. He was married to a woman from Colombia. I was asking him about Cuba and Colombia, two countries he had lived in before coming to the U.S. It quickly became apparent that his political attitudes were anti-leftist; he weas lamenting that a leftist candidate had just won the election for president of Colombia.

He noted that this candidate had previously been the leader of a guerilla war against a previous Colombian government and stated that every time guerillas took power in a country the government became authoritarian, you were no longer allowed access to a free press, viewpoints opposing government policy were repressed, etc. He pointed to Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela as examples. We had a longer conversation, but I was completely unable to dislodge the connection that he made between “socialist” and “authoritarian and unfree.”

In some ways, this pairing is understandable for the older generation because the primary experiences they have had with self-described socialist societies were with the Communist countries (Soviet Union, Eastern European satellites of the Soviet Union, China, Cuba, etc.) I think it is difficult to underestimate the damage that was done to the cause of socialism by the failed one-party authoritarian experiments that were known as the Communist world. (Of course, there are some positive features of these countries such as universal literacy and education and usually widely available healthcare, but they are universally unfree societies that lose disproportionate percentages of their population if emigration is allowed — frequently it is not.)

Most modern societies have a mix of socialist and capitalist features although the capitalist ones tend to be more fundamental and prominent. It helps to think of countries as more socialistic or more capitalistic since pure forms of either socialism or capitalism are basically non-existent (although some of the most unequal societies with minimal social welfare features come perilously close to pure capitalism). If we look at the spectrum from most socialistic to most capitalistic, which countries in the world are closest to straight out socialism?

If we’re talking about democratic socialism, the Nordic countries (Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland) come closest. They combine a large social welfare sector with a strong safety net, relatively low levels of inequality, a massive union movement incorporating a strong majority of the workforce, strongly democratic governments, and a fluctuating but comparatively large public sector. (Wikipedia states that approximately 30% of the workforce in Nordic countries work in the public sector.) In the recent past these countries have generally retrogressed toward capitalism (Norway is an exception: its public sector wealth exceeds the private sector), but the difference from more capitalistic societies is still stark. These countries are not fully socialist, of course. But they are the most socialistic in the world. The consequences are stark: they consistently rank among the happiest countries in the world on the happiness index and they are among the healthiest and most equal in the world.

All of this may be so commonly understood that it hardly needs to be said. Yet, I think there are a couple of lessons for us in DSA from the account given above. First, we would be wise to always describe ourselves as democratic socialists. The simple word “socialist” has been sullied to such a degree that the modifier is necessary if we are to be clear about our politics.

Second, members of the DSA would be wise to separate the notions of socialism from a completely centrally planned “command” economy. Attempts at such an economy have universally been authoritarian failures and we need to be exploring other ways to gain democratic control over the economy and to combat vast inequalities of wealth. I think some version of market socialism where the workers own and control the means of production but utilize market mechanisms to coordinate the economy and respond to consumer demand is the best approach, but that is the subject for another essay.

Third, we should always be vigilantly paying attention to our public image. That doesn’t mean we hide any of our substantive political positions, but it does mean avoiding public displays of Soviet-era symbols of so-called “Communist” countries and/or statements of approval for these governments or their leaders. (I understand that some DSA members may adore these leaders or governments, but they are a distinct minority and do not in any way represent the general consensus of the organization.)

Some years ago, I remember participating in a Tampa Bay DSA chapter march for May Day where some of the marchers held hammer and sickle signs. The march stopped at one point and an American flag was burned. I thought that was counterproductive and contrary to the general thrust of DSA politics at the time, and I still do. The DSA is not an authoritarian communist organization, and it makes no sense to try to coopt Communist symbols or methodologies for an organization attempting to build a democratic socialist society. Why adopt the symbols of such a failed and unpopular movement when we have our own much more popular vision to put out to the public?

Since this entire article has been directed against the hard left-authoritarian fringe of our socialist movement, I should make it clear that I equally oppose attempts on the other side of our movement to dissolve DSA’s distinctive politics into a mushy liberalism indistinguishable from the predominant thinking of the Democratic Party. Unlike liberals, democratic socialists see the structural causes of inequality, racism, sexism, homo- and trans-phobia, etc. baked into a capitalist economy. Divisions within the ranks of working people are critical to the survival of capitalism. But that too is the subject of another piece. The main point here is this: let’s avoid alienating the bulk of the American people by displaying false images of ourselves as upholders of undemocratic ideas and regimes.

This essay was inspired by a meeting with several organizers after I had been fairly MIA from my DSA chapter for a while. It is extremely refreshing to be doing tough work with people who understand the need for every person to step back from time to time, and to have others ready and willing to step up.

It is really difficult to be living right now. Yes, the past was really difficult too. More difficult in a lot of aspects. Technology has made life easier, living standards have improved across the globe, medicine has cured illnesses that wiped out countless people before us.

But right now, in this time, it is so difficult to be alive because we can see (or imagine) the end. For once the future does not look bright and promising. It looks like extreme weather events increasing exponentially until Earth is left ragged, with just a fraction of the human population to scrounge what remains. And this possibility exists within our lifetime.

Pair the recognition of what is happening to our planet with the reality of everyday life for the majority of people. Even if we know the severity of the climate crisis, even if it scares us and makes us angry, what can we do about it? At least five days a week we spend the majority of our waking hours working for someone else. Then we have kids to take care of, chores to do, second jobs; even the simple tasks of feeding yourself is a burden when you’re exhausted from the toil of living in this society. 

So you push it away. You see a flood happening in a different part of the country and you think, “thank god it wasn’t me.” And you push the news out of your head so you can retain other information that you need for work, or for your kids and family, or simply because dwelling on The Crisis sends you spiraling and you don’t have time for that. And pushing it away is easy to do, because that’s what the entire world is doing. The news is not connecting the dots. Discussing it with others just leads to sadness and cynicism. Some have refused to even believe the reality unfolding around them. And always, the question becomes, what can we (what can I) even do about it?

With the pressures all around us and hardly any free time to give, it’s so easy to let someone else handle it. I don’t have time to meet and talk about how to solve climate change. Oh, you’re taking donations? Here, I can donate a little each month. And you’ll handle it? Awesome, one less thing to worry about. And some of those organizations getting donations do help…a little bit…with what they can. But they’re still part of the system as it stands, and most likely will not be able (or allowed) to change that system.

And some of those organizations and people are far more nefarious. How nice to think one person, or one group of people, will solve all the problems. And how easy, when there are so many other pressures in our lives, to not have to think about solving the most incomprehensible problems that face humanity. 

Fascism entices many people who feel extremely alienated and lonely. But what can be even more concerning is how it silently draws so many others. They don’t always like what’s being said, but hey, something’s gotta change right? And here’s someone who sounds really impressive. Like they can take the reins and figure things out. So I don’t have to. So I can deal with all the other shit I have going on in my life. I may not agree with everything they’re espousing, but they’re not taking up more of my time. They’re not asking me to “get involved” and give more time that I really don’t have. So fine, here’s my donation. Or here’s my vote. Now let me shove the scary thoughts to the back of my mind and get on with failing to balance my budget for the third month in a row.

This is what we’re up against. Those of us who understand what it takes to actually solve the toughest problems facing humanity. We have to convey that yes, these problems are extremely scary and difficult, but not impossible. We can figure it out, and change things for the better. But unfortunately, it’s going to take more than donating money, or voting for the person who says they can fix it all. It’s going to take your time, your precious energy. That you don’t even have enough to give. Because it will take all of us to make this change, there are no shortcuts.

Even those of us who understand this, and have started to put what little time and energy we have into changing the world around us, it is very difficult for us too. You see someone who seems to have limitless energy, and you think to yourself they’ve got it. I can sit back and let them handle it. But eventually that person’s energy will run out. Or they will experience a health problem. Or they simply lose interest and walk away. Then what?

When organizing in a truly democratic way and strictly on a volunteer basis you learn very quickly that you must have a large base of engaged people to keep it afloat. Because it’s difficult to be living right now. And we all need rest. If you can’t step back to rest and have your spot filled in by someone who has the energy at that moment, your cause will never survive. 

It is so hard to build a group that functions in this way. If you’re working on it, keep going. It is worth it. If you find a group that already has this dynamic in some form or another, stick with it. Make it better. Keep it going. The only way we’re going to solve our most difficult problems is together. We all need rest and grace at times. And when you’re talking with those who are tired, who want a quick answer instead of more obligations, remember that you feel that way too sometimes. And the good news is, you have a group of people who can step up when you have to give your arms a break. So even if this new, tired, busy person can only sit in the boat with you for a while, that is fine. Others are rowing. And at some point, that new person will feel that they can give a little more. Which will be right when an oar opens up because someone else needs a break.

It is really difficult to be living right now. We can make it a little easier by supporting one another when we inevitably need a break. And that’s the only way we can truly make the changes we want to see for our future.

By Julie C

The post Change is Hard Work appeared first on Democratic Socialists of America.

The Atlanta Democratic Socialists of America condemns the murder of an Atlanta Forest Defender by the Georgia State Troopers. This killing is the latest act of state violence taken against the Forest Defenders, and the local authorities aim to misrepresent it as an act of self-defense to absolve themselves of responsibility. Over several months, the police have escalated their attack on Forest Defenders using violent tactics, in an attempt to suppress public opinion and organized political dissent to building a costly, corporate-funded cop training facility. Wednesday morning’s raid represents a clear escalation by law enforcement who orchestrated a violent eviction of protestors from public land. Atlanta DSA maintains our full support for the democratic rights of all people to peacefully protest this development and defend Atlanta’s public forests from destruction. As socialists, we should always condemn attempts by police and the far-right to mischaracterize Left-wing activists as “outside agitators” or “domestic terrorists.”

Atlanta has the highest income inequality in America, yet all the corporate Democratic and Republican officials have to offer is environmental destruction and more state violence. Cop City is both an ecological and racial justice issue, with both Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens and Georgia Governor Brian Kemp calling for the destruction of much of Atlanta’s South River Forest as well as the expansion of the carceral system through a $90 million dollar cop facility. We stand firmly with the working-class communities who overwhelmingly oppose the destruction of public forests, and who squarely reject the construction of an 85 acre police base in their backyards. We call on Atlanta Mayor Andre Dickens and the Atlanta City Council to shut down construction and cancel the city’s plans for a new cop academy. We reiterate calls for an independent investigation of this recent murder by police, which should be shielded from the corrupt political agenda of local officials and the Atlanta Police Foundation.

As socialists committed to environmental justice and the abolition of the carceral state, we ask our comrades and the community to donate to the Atlanta Solidarity Fund to provide bail support to protestors arrested in Atlanta. You can follow and find more ways to support the movement at defendtheatlforest.org and @defendtheATLforest.

Statement co-written by Atlanta DSA and the National DSA Abolition Working Group

Workers at America’s only major unionized publishing house, HarperCollins, went on strike in early November of last year after their contract expired in April. As their strike approaches day 50 with little response from management, workers are standing strong on the picket line and fighting for higher wages, real racial equity on the job, and a union security agreement or “agency shop”. Tonight, we hear from bargaining committee member Carly Katz on how workers are standing up to a company owned by right-wing media conglomerate NewsCorp and how their union is sustaining the longest strike in their shop’s history.

In other New York labor news, Senate Judiciary Committee hearings started Wednesday January 18 for Governor Hochul’s nominee for the next chief judge of the state’s top court. In the weeks since Hochul announced her nomination of Hector LaSalle to the Court of Appeals, labor unions have joined with the abortion rights movement, socialists in office, and Senate progressives to oppose a judge with an alarming record on labor and abortion rights. Last week, TWU International president John Samuelsen broke with NY Labor and refused to denounce LaSalle. We’ll hear from transit worker John Ferretti on why he won’t be following his union leadership and what the LaSalle story can tell us about the power of organized labor in our city.

Find ways to support and follow HarperCollins Union here: https://linktr.ee/hcpunion

“No Justice, No Peace”: Kamala Harris visits Ann Arbor, Highlighting Hypocrisy in Federal Climate Agenda

By Juan Gonzalez Valdivieso

Vice President Kamala Harris visited Rackham Auditorium at the University of Michigan Thursday afternoon for a conversation on “the Administration’s commitment to tackle our climate crisis”. This was the message conveyed to the several hundred event invitees across the university via individual email correspondence just a few days prior. Interestingly, communication regarding her arrival as well as event specifics remained largely ambiguous during the hours leading up to her visit. The exact time and location of the event were not confirmed until the day before nor did local news outlets and media providers make the public privy to the day’s happenings.

Despite this strange and oddly convenient bout of secrecy, coverage of the event following its conclusion was unabashedly celebratory, veering away from direct praise only to discuss adjacent news such as the COVID diagnosis of university president Santa Ono. The Michigan Daily focused heavily on hopeful messaging, noting references to on-campus sustainability, automotive industry innovation, and intersectionality made by the event’s speaker panel. MLive described a relationship of reverence and appreciation between Ann Arbor and Harris’ message, claiming that the city “embraced…Harris’ call for urgent climate action”.

However, these interpretations refused to acknowledge a fundamental quality of Harris’ visit: hypocrisy. The US government cannot engage in genuine and good-faith conversations on climate until it actively grapples with its oppressive and genocidal relationship to Israel, a contradiction best highlighted by the protest held just outside of Rackham Auditorium that same afternoon.

Following the news of Harris’ visit to campus, Students Allied for Freedom and Equality (SAFE) got to work, strategically organizing a demonstration that would speak to the blatant hypocrisies of a government taking part in climate talks while simultaneously funding and supporting an apartheid regime that habitually commits acts of environmental devastation. SAFE is a student organization for Palestinian solidarity that serves as the Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapter at the university. The organization represents a diverse range of perspectives united in the collective struggle towards Palestinian liberation. As such, the presence of a political figure as important and consequential as Harris provided low hanging fruit to a group actively seeking forms of effective communication and protest. After all, Israel’s exploits are reprehensible both socio-politically and environmentally.

In 2022, Israel committed a host of war crimes including dropping bombs on Palestinian apartment buildings, invading Palestinian neighborhoods, preventing paramedics from accessing in-need Palestinians, and attacking individuals at Palestinian funerals. It was also the deadliest year for West Bank Palestinians in almost 20 years. Even in the first two weeks of 2023, the atrocities abounded. During the year’s first three days, three Palestinians were killed — including 2 children. Israel’s new extremist government also acted on its explicitly Zionist declarations by bombing the homes of two murdered Palestinians, destroying multiple homes as well as a water tank in Masafer Yatta, and breaking into Al Aqsa Mosque, a sacred Muslim holy site. Moreover, a formal ban of the Palestinian flag in public spaces has now become an official part of Israeli policy.

Environmentally, the same pattern of genocidal violence and ruthless destruction rings true. Israel not only has one of the biggest per capita ecological and carbon footprints in the word — top 10% and 20% respectively — but it routinely engages in massive tree uprooting and harmful pesticide use. It also regularly pollutes Palestinian resources, targets Palestinian farmland, and denies Palestinians access to renewable energy. While doing so, it perpetuates an environmentalist image that claims to espouse “green” ideals. In reality, this “greenwashing” is simply a calculated attempt to cover up acts of criminal war, environmental degradation, and apartheid.

The chants and speeches featured in the SAFE protest spoke to these brutal realities with coherence and poignancy. Cries for “Intifada revolution”, the smashing of “the settler Zionist state”, and the abolition of administrative “greenwashing” could be heard among dozens of waving Palestinian flags and exclamatory posters. University Junior and SAFE Education Director Noor Sami powerfully condemned the 3.8 billion dollars invested into Israel’s military defense budget by the US, claiming that the “Biden-Harris Administration, much like its predecessors…is 100% complacent in the attempted erasure of the Palestinian people from their homeland.” University Sophomore and SAFE Activism Chair Joseph Fisher movingly emphasized the catastrophic proportions of Israel’s environmental policy, describing how the Zionist entity “water[s] their invasive species with Palestinian blood and completely obliterate[s] the dead sea.” He would later go on to denounce the harmful dumping of waste and destruction of freshwater reserves in Israeli settlements.

Above all, though, SAFE’s protest made one thing crystal clear to Harris, the university, Ann Arbor, and everyone and everything in between: so long as Israeli apartheid continues, so long as genocidal brutality persists, and so long as Palestine remains unfree, no substantive conversations about climate — or any other issue for that matter — can take place. Even more pressingly, there will continue to be unrest, grievance, and demonstration that demands unconditional liberation and freedom as well as a permanent maintenance of justice for Palestinian generations to come.

“No Justice, No Peace”: Kamala Harris visits Ann Arbor, Highlighting Hypocrisy in Federal Climate… was originally published in The Michigan Specter on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.