By Mary Grahame Hunter and Anthony D.

In December 2023 workers at the Ferndale Library wrapped up a year-long struggle to win their union and then a first contract. The union drive was organized and led by Detroit DSA member and library worker Mary Grahame Hunter. Our chapter provided support in many ways throughout. We recount the year-long campaign timeline with insights on unionizing library workers and winning a first contract (written by Mary Grahame) as well as lessons learned from the DSA solidarity campaign (written by Anthony).

Timeline

December 5, 2022: Around 20 library workers went public with their campaign to unionize with the Newspaper Guild of Detroit. Their reasons included better pay, an overhaul of their paid-time-off system, and job security so they could continue doing the job they love. Mary Grahame had learned critical workplace organizing skills in our chapter’s Organizing 101 classes (the six-week Night School we held in May/June 2020) and immediately put them to use. When the campaign was ready to go public and needed community support, she knew she could count on Detroit DSA members to show up in solidarity and met with members of the Labor Working Group to strategize about a solidarity campaign.

December 10: Detroit DSA members discovered that the Ferndale Library Board, composed of seven elected members, planned to hold an emergency meeting prior to their regularly scheduled meeting December 15. It had only a closed-door session on the agenda, presumably to discuss their response to the union drive. Detroit DSA members attended and made public comments before being kicked out for the closed-door session, telling the board they needed to voluntarily recognize the union.

December 15: The Board held its regular monthly meeting and could have voted on whether to voluntarily recognize the union. Detroit DSA members and other supporters spoke during public comment demanding that they do so. Despite a majority of workers signing on to the union effort, and an upswell of community support for the workers at this meeting and the previous board meeting, the Board instead voted to hire a union-busting law firm to fight their workers. They never held a vote on whether to voluntarily recognize the union.

February 2, 2023: The workers won their union with 90% voting in favor of joining the Newspaper Guild of Detroit. Soon after, DSA helped them throw a party to celebrate and get ready to fight for their first contract. In March, they started bargaining sessions.

June 4: A local hate group went into the Ferndale Library and removed all the books on their youth Pride displays. Detroit DSA mobilized folks to show up to the Library Board meeting on June 15 to voice support for library workers and the queer community, demand that management take action to protect the workers from hate groups, and pressure them to reach an agreement with the union on a contract (see the talking points we used here and watch Ferndale Library workers Aby, Simon, and Mary Grahame speak during that meeting). The Library Board did not take any concrete actions to protect workers despite an avalanche of public comments from both library workers and community supporters urging them to do so.

At the beginning of the workers’ organizing campaign, four Black women worked at the Ferndale Library. By mid-2023, all four had either been bullied out of their jobs by the then-Library Director (she resigned in January 2024) or had to quit in search of better working conditions and pay.

October: The union bargaining team had been in numerous bargaining sessions with management to negotiate both the non-economic and economic demands of their first contract. While they had made progress on the non-economic demands, they expected a lot of pushback once they started to discuss economics. Detroit DSA turned out members and supporters to the October 12 and November 16 Library Board meetings to yet again pressure them to meet the workers’ demands.

November 7, 2023 (Election Day): DSA members held a “read-in” at the library during polling hours where we wore red and/or union swag to show support for the workers’ union and taped posters that read “we support Ferndale library workers” to our laptops and seat backs.

December: A year after going public with their union, the workers reached a tentative agreement on a first contract. It was unanimously ratified by members and passed by the Board at its December meeting.

Unionizing and winning a contract (Mary Grahame)

The first step in organizing the Ferndale Library was using the basic building block we covered in DSA’s Organizing 101: talk to your coworkers. I broached organizing a union in one-on-one, face-to-face conversations with several coworkers I was close to, some of whom had brought up the subject of unions before. Everyone I initially spoke to was interested, so once there were four of us (a de facto Organizing Committee), I reached out to DSA for advice on what to do next. A member of the Labor Working Group and I had coffee a few days later to go over what steps I had already taken and map out what needed to happen next.

The Organizing Committee made a plan for who would speak to whom from which department, and in what order, to see how many people we could likely get on board before going public with the union. It was an easier campaign than most, for several reasons. We’re a small workplace with one location, so it was easy to talk to the majority of our colleagues within a short amount of time. Additionally, many of them were already favorably disposed toward unions by virtue of coming from union families or having been in unions before. The most difficult part of these conversations was finding the time and space to have them in a small building with few spaces for private discussions.

At the same time, our DSA contact put us in touch with Stevie Blanchard, the Union Administrator for the Newspaper Guild (TNG) of Detroit, and I met with her to see if our unit would be a good fit to join the TNG local. While we did investigate other union affiliations (there is no specialized union for library workers the way there is for some other professions), the size and responsiveness of the Guild were a great match for the size of our bargaining unit, which hovers between 20 and 30 people.

Stevie met with the Organizing Committee and set us up with a link for unit members to sign digital union cards. Once we had 75% of our unit’s signed cards in hand, the union went public and we petitioned the Library Board for voluntary recognition, as described above. Despite not receiving it, we won our union election with 90%. The party that DSA threw to celebrate meant the absolute world to the Organizing Committee and to other bargaining unit members.

The Organizing Committee had regular meetings with DSA members to discuss community support, mostly through DSA presence at Library Board meetings and participation in public comment. Regardless of the reaction of the Library Board, the presence of so many people speaking in unanimous favor of the union and support for the workers did wonderful things for worker morale throughout the election and bargaining process. The union effort was covered in MetroTimes, Oakland County Times, WDET, and The New Republic.

While bargaining a first contract ultimately moved forward on a reasonable timeline, our then-Library Director (who has since left) appeared to take the process personally, which led to a lot of tension in the workplace, particularly for those on the Negotiating Committee. Talking it all over with DSA comrades certainly helped keep my spirits up, and continued community presence in the library at board meetings and an all-day read-in helped lighten the atmosphere for workers as negotiations continued. The fact that many DSA members now attend library programs and continue to participate in board meetings and library life is a sterling example of how labor solidarity leads to stronger community ties.

Our contract is now in place. In addition to the standard benefits of union membership–the right to union representation when disciplined, no longer being at-will employees–we achieved a better wage schedule, an overhaul of the paid-time-off system, faster vacation accrual based on length of employment, paid lunches for full-time staff, guaranteed breaks for part-time staff, and a cost-of-living payment tied to library funding levels instead of the whims of the board.

DSA’s solidarity campaign (Anthony)

Once Mary Grahame reached out to DSA, we immediately got to work building a solidarity campaign that could bring together both Ferndale residents and DSA members living in Ferndale and the surrounding cities. Detroit DSA has a high concentration of members in Ferndale and throughout our outreach to them it became obvious that socialists love libraries and were excited to participate. Many members that we contacted used the library frequently, were regular attendees at its book clubs, and even knew some of the workers.

DSA members from the Labor Working Group and Communications Committee met regularly with some of the library workers, including Mary Grahame, to both guide them in having productive organizing conversations with their coworkers and to strategize on how to build community support. These meetings were essential for taking guidance from the workers to ensure that the direction on what support was needed was coming directly from them. Collectively, we were able to generate a number of different ways to draw in more support .

To help get the word out on the ground, we designed and printed posters that read “We Support Ferndale Library Workers” and distributed them to the library workers and DSA members living in Ferndale to give to neighbors and local businesses to display in their windows. We intended to make it obvious to the Library Board that the entire city was behind the workers and hoped that they were frequently encountering the signs as they moved around the city. This effort created an easy opportunity for DSA members in Ferndale to talk to other residents about the campaign. While we never found the right opportunity to do it, we initially planned to pair up DSA members with library workers to canvass businesses and neighbors together to build deeper relationships between DSA, the workers, and Ferndale residents.

To help get the word out on social media, our Communications Committee made a video about why Ferndale library workers are so essential to the community. DSA members helped to write talking points for supporters to use in public comments at the monthly Library Board meetings. On a day when we knew many people would be in the library, we organized a “read-in” in which supporters hung out in red union gear and with “We Support Ferndale Library Workers” signs taped to their laptops or chairs.

We hope that this type of labor solidarity campaign can be replicated as more DSA members organize their workplaces. DSA — and close ally organization Labor Notes, by extension — should act as a home for workers to be trained on workplace organizing. Along the way, Detroit DSA members with workplace organizing experience can provide mentorship. Once workers are ready to go public with their union drive, they can call on DSA to help organize community support. By working together, organized workers and DSA members can build relationships that start to merge the socialist and labor movements and lead to collective organizing work beyond the workplace.

The Detroit Socialist is produced and run by members of Detroit DSA’s Newspaper Collective. Interested in becoming a member of Detroit DSA? Go to metrodetroitdsa.com/join to become a member. Send a copy of the dues receipt to: membership@metrodetroitdsa.com in order to get plugged in to our activities!

---

Train, Organize, Win! Unionizing the Ferndale Library with DSA’s Help was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 29, 2024

MADISON, WI – America’s Credit Unions (formerly “Credit Union National Association, Inc.”) has informed the Office and Professional Employees International Union (OPEIU) Local 39 of its intent to eliminate lay off up to 30% of the workforce at its headquarters in Madison. America’s Credit Unions is the result of the merger between Madison’s CUNA and its primary competitor, National Association of Federally-Insured Credit Unions (NAFCU).

The Company filed a notice with the Department of Workforce Development on January 12, 2024, cc’ing City of Madison Mayor Satya Rhodes-Conway: “This is a difficult decision, and we appreciate any assistance you may provide to our employees in this difficult period with their job search and transition.”

America’s Credit Unions refused to meet or provide any details to OPEIU 39, the employees’ Union, until April. At a second meeting in May, the Company announced that it had completed a reorganization, and that position eliminations and layoffs were “imminent”. OPEIU 39 has been committed to maintaining quality jobs in the community.

Jillian Crubel, a Conference Specialist and union member, said, “Trying to understand how layoffs will impact us has been exhausting. Union-represented employees have been asking management for information about layoffs for months. The organization has been purposely withholding while at the same time putting a target on the union’s back.”

Executive Vice President Jill Tomalin explained the reduction was necessary in anticipation of a shortfall of up to $12 million. “They’re making cuts to workers while their tax returns show that they’re paying CEO Jim Nussle over $2.5 million,” said Andy Sernatinger, Business Representative for OPEIU 39. “They could keep everyone employed and Nussle would still be a millionaire.”

America’s Credit Unions has retained attorneys from Littler Mendelson, a law firm specializing in “union avoidance”. Littler is renowned for representing companies like Starbucks and Amazon, who face scores of unfair labor practice complaints in front of the National Labor Relations Board. Littler charges clients up to $1000/hour for its services.

Sarah Shepler, Chief Steward for the Union, added, “For months, we have sought to engage America’s Credit Unions in meaningful dialogue regarding the announced 25-30% reduction in the workforce. Despite our repeated attempts, America’s Credit Unions has persistently refused to provide critical documents requested through information requests and has continually avoided scheduling necessary meetings. It signifies a stark departure from the cultural equality that CUNA had diligently established over the years.”

###

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew Sernatinger – Business Representative, OPEIU 39 asernatinger@opeiu39.org | 608-572-7947

Four community members were arrested while peacefully protesting US support of Israel’s ongoing genocide of the Palestinian people. Please donate to help cover the legal fees of fighting these bogus charges. And please sign the petition to drop the charges!

On Wednesday, May 15, the Grand Rapids DSA participated in Palestine Solidarity Grand Rapids’ protest against the ongoing genocide in Palestine and the US  government’s gross complicity in it. Our peaceful protest was interrupted by a completely disproportionate police response. After only 5 minutes of marching, a fleet of police cars was tailing the protesters and blaring their horns and sirens.

The GRPD continued to follow the march to where it ended at Monument Park. Then officers moved in to arrest people at random. They arrested 3 members of Palestine Solidarity GR and 1 member of GRDSA for protesting peacefully and filming the police. The protest moved to the Kent County Jail where they were held for more than 4 hours before finally being released on bond. We did nothing wrong at our protest against genocide but they are still facing bogus misdemeanor charges.

In the West Bank, settler-conquerors and their IDF backers bulldoze and burn Palestinian communities in a creeping, decades-long conquest. The vast majority of Gaza, a city of 2 million human beings, lies in ruins. Netanyahu and his armies are determined to flatten what’s left so that the refugees of this war can be forced out in a grand act of ethnic cleansing.

Meanwhile there is a movement in our country with the express goal of outlawing all protests against these crimes and our complicity in them under threat of arrest and police brutality. It started in the colleges and now it’s in our city streets. It’s more important now than ever to fight back against the apartheid policies of Israel and our growing police state before it’s too late. We’ll continue protesting with our comrades in Palestine Solidarity GR and anyone else horrified by the state of the world today should do the same. We will not be silenced by intimidation.

The post Drop the Charges! appeared first on Grand Rapids Democratic Socialists of America.

For over five and half years and 220+ episodes, we here at Revolutions Per Minute have brought the voices of activists and organizers fighting for a better world to the listeners of WBAI. Tonight, we dig into the show’s archives to hear some of those interviews through the years. Each of the interviews you will hear tonight, in their own ways, exemplify the different dimensions of our show, the members of our collective, and showcase the perspectives that you won’t hear anywhere else. Ultimately, this is a show about the RPM difference.  

 

Segments Used from Past Episodes:  

1- PSC and New Deal for CUNY

2- Build Public Renewables Act

3- Kansas DSA and Protecting Abortion Rights

4- The Bronx Fires

5- Palestinian Solidarity in the UAW

 

It looks like Grand Rapids is getting a new soccer stadium. At least that’s the plan of Grand Action 2.0, a city development group helmed by DeVos, a Van Andel, and a president at 5/3 Bank. This new stadium, which will have the capacity for up to 8,500 visitors, will be funded mainly through public funds and a tax hike, with the vague promise that it will pay for itself some time in the next 30 years. 

The stadium will be built on a 7 acre plot of land just outside of downtown in West Grand Rapids. With that much space, the city could build around 1,000 much needed housing units, but with the addition of a stadium that number is reduced by half. Grand Action 2.0 is claiming that their stadium will “unlock the potential for 500 to 550 future housing units in the immediate area.” This allows them to present the false idea that the construction of this new housing is conditioned on whether the stadium gets built. All this, in the midst of Grand Rapids’ clear housing crisis with a need for 14,106 housing units by 2027, is a risky move.

The most important thing to note about this project is that a large percentage of its cost will be covered by public funds, around 65%, or 115 million dollars for the stadium alone. As of right now, it is unclear how much of the stadium’s net revenue will go directly to replenishing those funds, if any at all. 

Future neighbors of the soccer stadium have also brought up concerns of noise, traffic, parking and a spike in housing costs. So far very little has been done to address these concerns, seemingly showing a further lack of planning from the City Commission and Grand Action 2.0.

One of our core ideals is using our common resources to guarantee the Right to Housing, but the way Grand Action 2.0 has structured this deal is very concerning. Grand Action is very careful throughout their literature to refer to the new apartment units only as potential new housing. Public funds footing so much of the bill proves that at any point our government could fund the construction of social housing, but it chooses not to. 

A new soccer stadium that supports local and youth soccer would be a fantastic addition to the community. We just hope that the city will keep in mind that, right now, affordable housing and keeping public funds for public projects are the actual priorities, and should come before a new soccer stadium drawn up at the whim of billionaires.

The post Public Funds, Private Profits: How Grand Rapids is Building a New Soccer Stadium appeared first on Grand Rapids Democratic Socialists of America.

We in Houston DSA stand in unwavering solidarity with our brave public-school teachers as they choose to risk their careers to stand up to the inhumane treatment of students, teachers, […]

Jeff Wells joins the podcast to talk with us about the new book he coedited: Preaching the Uncontrolling Love of God: Sermons, Essays, and Worship Elements from the Perspective of Open, Relational, and Process Theology. Purchase his book! https://www.amazon.com/Preaching-Uncontrolling-Love-God-Perspective/dp/1958670324 To speak with Jeff or join the mailing list, contact jefferywells.love@gmail.com Join us October 17–19 in Denver for theologybeer.camp ! Use the coupon code TAKEHEARTHOBBIT for $50 off your ticket. Sign up before June 1 for reduced ticket prices. Email us at religioussocialism@gmail.com if you plan to come, we'd love to meet up.

After seizing control of an Alexandria city council meeting, Northern Virginia locals introduced and passed their own resolution calling for an end to Israel's genocide.

At the start of the COVID pandemic, AC Transit cut bus service dramatically. The District has been slow in spending budgeted funds toward restoring cuts because it lacks the workforce to operate additional service. The same hiring and retention crisis faces many other transit agencies, and impacts other sectors like education and healthcare, as well. 

At AC Transit, one of the major drivers of the retention crisis is bus schedules that don’t build in enough time to ensure workers get a break to stretch, use the bathroom, or eat a meal. Nathaniel Arnold, vice president of Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) Local 192, spoke at the April 24 board meeting about the dire situation, expressing the union’s frustration that the agency has “not been putting the time on the runs that they said that they were going to,” and adding, “We’ll be able to retain our workforce by also making better working conditions for them so that they don’t leave.”

AC Transit’s board has called a special meeting on Wednesday, June 5, as part of its service realignment initiative. The issue of schedules that don’t work for bus operators and are unreliable for riders will be a major topic of discussion. A petition for workers and riders is circulating this month, and the union is calling on its members, and riders who support them, to turn out on June 5.

Majority spoke with ATU 192 member, AC Transit bus operator and assistant shop steward Jack Watkins about the stakes in the struggle for better schedules. – The Editors

Majority: What’s the problem with the schedules? What impacts are they having on you and your co-workers as bus operators?

Jack Watkins: The schedules are designed to be unsustainable. They’re designed to place subliminal stress onto the driver to where we internalize the necessity to make it to the end of the line [on time], with the implicit understanding that we know that it’s not possible to do safely. And that gets coupled with the [AC Transit] District constantly putting out “drive safely, drive safely,” to cover themselves. They put up paperwork and memos around driving safely, but then they create schedules and cut time off of the schedules, and create a situation where they know that it’s impossible to do that, and they expect us to silently adhere to that, to walk that impossible tightrope. And that eats into our mental health, our physical health and the way that we’re able to show up for the community.

Majority: Talk more about the impacts on the drivers.

JW: Most simply, we are pressured to strategize when and how to step away from the bus and take a moment to breathe. When we get to the end of the line, we’re often feeling that pressure of calculating to the minute how much time we have to find a bathroom, use the bathroom, come back from the bathroom and get back to that bus. So that we can make that next trip on time. The same regarding our ability to take breaks to recover mentally, to have water, and to have food. I know drivers that say that they don’t get the opportunity to eat their lunch so often that they’ve stop packing lunches. And then when they get off work late they end up stopping to get some fast food on the way home which negatively affects their bodies. With us having a sedentary job, we do try to plan for our mental and physical health needs, and that gets undermined by trying to maintain the schedule because even if we pack a salad or something that is nutritionally beneficial to us, we are often unable to eat it and we find ourselves eating when we get off work late at night, which throws off any healthy routine.

And also our mental health is messed up because we do a good amount of mental math at all times in addition to driving: our brain power is used up doing math to figure out how long it’s gonna take to get from one time point to the next time point. “I have to make it from Seminary and MacArthur down to MacArthur and Fruitvale in five minutes. How can I do that?” Driving safely and doing that is impossible. On a busy day or even at nighttime, it’s impossible to make it that many miles in five minutes with the lights and all that stuff while trying to drive safely. Calculating the risk-reward with me running through this yellow light? Keeping our heads on the swivel looking out for other cars driving around us and making sure that we maintain a safe distance from other vehicles. How fast are we trying to pull off from red lights or stop signs? We’re compromising all of these safety aspects, trying to maintain the schedules which is unreasonable. And it’s this pressure that goes unaddressed.  Management functions in a space where they’re able to pretend it doesn’t exist. 

Majority: How do the unsustainable schedules affect your riders? 

JW: Bus drivers make decisions to pass up passengers, particularly disabled passengers, passengers in wheelchairs. Not a week goes by that I don’t have somebody in a wheelchair that says the last bus passed them up. I believe that is a calculation that the bus drivers are making based on trying to maintain time.  Every day, a passenger says “hey, this bus passed me up,” if not the bus directly in front of me a bus earlier today or a bus on a different line. 

In addition to the way that we treat the passengers when they get on the bus with a pocketful of change, the immediate reaction to every bus driver that I know when they think about a passenger with a bunch of pennies is,  “oh man, they’re so slow,” and that in itself is evidence that they’re thinking about the speed at which they can operate the bus. And the passengers feel that; we treat the passengers like they’re a nuisance or we treat them like we’re rushing them. When I talk to passengers about my personal actions they talk to me about how they wish bus drivers were nicer to them, or they wish that bus drivers would take more time with them. The passengers regularly will apologize preemptively about doing regular things because they have been mentally trained to feel like by default they are going to be an inconvenience to the bus driver. 

Majority: How do the schedules impact attendance by operators? 

JW: We get burned out. I said to myself the other day, “Man, I wish I could call off today. I’m tired. Oh man, this day was really really stressful for me.” And a sizable amount of that stress comes from the constant act of doing all this math, finding these shortcuts, risk-reward, safety measures, all in effort to maintain these schedules. In addition to driving the bus, traffic, passengers, mental health, all of these things. That pressure from the schedules is making a job that’s already difficult, far more difficult.  And so people decide, “hey, I might not even have any hours available to take off but I’m calling off because I CAN NOT do this tomorrow.” And that’s when people have to make a difficult decision between their mental health and their ability to feed their families. And that’s a position none of us should have to be forced in to. And sometimes they end up making the decision to just come in to work because we need the money, but ultimately in a largely unfit position to drive the bus that day. And then, they may get into an accident or burn out one way or another, cuss somebody out and end up getting some type of disciplinary response. Because of the way that they’ve responded to the stresses, they get a one day suspension or whatever, and those things can certainly be mitigated through designing these schedules with operators in mind. 

Majority: What are the impacts on riders when an operator calls off due to stress? And what about longer-term absences like when they are injured or have kidney disease?

When people are out on injury or health reasons, that’s difficult. Because there is a culture that I believe has been created that automatically assumes that the people who are out on injury are not being honest about their injuries. When I hear people talk about injury, they say “no, no, it’s legitimate. I wish I didn’t have to do this but I have to go out because my shoulder is in so much pain.”  If somebody’s out and they don’t have enough people to cover that shift, then that bus just won’t show up and then somebody’s waiting for an extra 20 minutes. And things like repetitive motion injury is a regular part of the job. But I think a lot of injuries are exacerbated by our schedules being so awful. And then that ends up affecting everybody.

East Bay DSA stands in solidarity with ATU 192’s contract fight in 2019. (Photo: Keith Brower Brown)

Majority: What needs to be done to fix this?

JW: We need better schedules. The District creates the schedules. And they’re creating them knowing that they’re not sustainable, but also knowing that drivers have been internalizing the stress and the pressure to adhere to the schedules.  The District uses these metrics around “is the bus physically making it to the location on time?” Without any care or consideration for the internalized pressure. They value the bus making it to the end of the line, but not the driver making it happen.  And the way that operators can push back is by rejecting that internalized pressure. “Hey, I know you want me to do this job in this way, according to the schedule, but it is impossible.” We must show management how impossible it is. I think operators need to be vocal about it, and they need to move to action by following not the schedule itself, but following the safety protocols primarily. And I think that would make it harder for the district to justify their schedule cuts. A lot of passengers do have consideration for bus drivers driving safely.  The way that bus drivers will be able to show the District, management, and the board of directors the severity of the unsustainable schedules is by taking that power back, rejecting the internalized stress that the management and district puts on our shoulders. That’s how we use our power as bus drivers to show them that “hey, I understand that you’re telling me to do these contradictory things. But you’re paying me to drive this bus safely – and not even paying well enough to do that – the labor that you’re asking me for contractually is in regards to driving this bus safely, not in regards to doing these mental gymnastics and mathematical calculations on how I can thread an impossible needle.”

Majority: How can your riders support ATU workers in this struggle?

JW: The riders can can show up with us to the AC Transit board meeting on June 5. They can sign the petition asking the board to meet drivers’ needs by fixing the schedules to address our harsh working conditions. But mainly by showing up to the board meetings and speaking out to let the board of directors know about the conditions of the bus drivers and how that affects their ability to get where they need to go reliably. Riders can tell the board the conditions that they see for the bus drivers and how that translates to them. 

Members of the community can speak out at the AC Transit Board Meeting on June 5, 2024, at 5pm. The meeting will be held at AC Transit’s Oakland headquarters, at 1600 Franklin Street, second floor.

1864. That’s the year Arizona’s abortion ban was passed. The archaic law has remained dormant since 1976, when Roe v. Wade made abortion legal nationwide, but a little over a month ago, on April 6, the Arizona Supreme Court resurrected the law, banning abortion in almost all cases.  

The Arizona State Legislature has since passed another law to repeal the 1864 ban, which would default the state to a still strict, 15-week ban on abortion because of a law that was passed and signed by former Republican Governor, Doug Ducey, in 2022.  

Meanwhile a coalition called, Arizona for Abortion Access has been gathering hundreds of thousands of signatures to get a constitutional amendment on the November ballot that would create a “fundamental right” to receive abortion care up until fetal viability.

Tonight, we’ll bring you a dispatch from the frontlines of the fight for abortion rights here in Arizona and talk to socialist organizers about how they’re trying to change the dynamic so reproductive rights can no longer be tossed around like a football during election years. 

For more info on Arizona abortion ballot measure visit: https://www.arizonaforabortionaccess.org/