The following is a summary of an interview John MarienthaI conducted with Silicon Valley DSA officer Jessen Fox on November 9.

Our chapter had a unique experience in working with the local Prop 50 coalition. We endorsed a second, local campaign alongside it:  Measure A, a temporary Santa Clara County sales tax that will expire in five years. Measure A passed by a 57%-43% margin.

Measure A created a 5/8 of one cent general sales tax increase, beginning April 1, 2026, to raise $330 million a year to replace the federal funding cut by Trump and the Republican Congress to the Santa Clara County Health System. Starting with the process of endorsement, our chapter allied with the South Bay Labor Council to do both phone banking and canvassing.

We started with the Communications Committee making daily announcements of phone banking. We also worked with SEIU local 521. We participated in two three-day phone banking blitzes. What made our presence unique was we showed up in specially designed chapter T-shirts that identified us as DSA volunteers. When canvassing we also tabled and wherever we went we brought a small quarter-page flier on our DSA activities. We learned it would be helpful to list upcoming chapter events on the flier and added a QR code that people could scan for more information. Our tabling also allowed local politicians Ash Kalra and Betty Duong to be in the pictures.

Jasmine was responsible for our superlative social media. Many of the Instagram-tagged photos were of DSA members in their unique shirts. On November 1st we had a big push. On election night itself, DSA was recognized by the South Bay Labor Council as one of the larger groups participating in the Measure A coalition. As a result of the campaign, we are also developing a working relationship with SEIU.

Marienthal adds: The capitalist system is stacked against us. Property taxes are more progressive but require a two-thirds vote, which is very difficult to get. Sales taxes are regressive, and as socialists we're generally for progressive, not regressive taxes. Given a choice, however, between our hospital care cratering and a regressive tax we chose the latter.

The horrors of genocide in Gaza and pogroms in other parts of occupied Palestine are finally having some impact on U.S. Democratic politics, local, state and national.

In California, where state party enforcers have continued to block resolutions expressing even mild solidarity, a number of recent developments offer a path forward: 

• In August, persistent written and live testimony over the course of a year led the Rules Committee to approve chartering a new party organization, California Democrats for Justice in Palestine (CDJP). It was swiftly OK’d by consent at an Executive Board meeting the next day. The new group, similar to a caucus but with fewer political and financial constraints, held its initial meeting online in October. The guest speaker was Anthony Aguilar, whistleblower from the phony Gaza Humanitarian Foundation “aid” outfit that shot hungry people as much as it fed them. CDJP will quickly formalize its structure and membership for an in-person debut at the February state convention in San Francisco. Registered Democrats are welcome to read the mission statement and join, showing support whether or not you’re able to play an active role. 

• Folks in Santa Clara County have chartered a Bay area club, Democrats for Palestinian Rights, which has undertaken an ambitious educational and advocacy agenda. One other such club exists, in Sacramento. Statewide CDJP leadership would love to see more spring up around the state.

• Another cheer for Santa Clara: In October, local advocates won overwhelming support in the county party for a resolution that makes no bones about condemning the genocide and demanding an arms embargo. Another one passed the same month in Shasta County.

• Organizers are angling for a pro-Palestine plank in the state party platform that will be adopted at the February convention. Preliminary testimony has been voiced and  proposals submitted, now consolidated as United for Humanity, with negotiation likely in the offing and a possible floor debate/vote. The sign-on deadline has passed for this stage but look for another petition in January. And expect pushback from California Jewish Democrats (known until recently as Democrats for Israel, also an official CDP-chartered body). The renaming is particularly galling to us Jews whom it decidedly doesn't represent!

• Many of the same organizers and others are also in the process of forming a PAC, entirely outside the party, dedicated to getting real progressives—anti-corruption and big money, pro-single payer, pro-Palestine, of course, and more as delegates to the state Central Committee (DSCC). It’s an outgrowth of previous short-term mobilizations to endorse progressives in the biannual ADEMs, in which about one-third of the DSCC is elected—fourteen per Assembly district. It will organize to recruit and support local slates of candidates for the next ADEM opportunity (early 2027, but with organizing needed way in advance), and also for county central committees (another third, on primary ballots in 2028); plus selected left candidates for office who can appoint the final third (until we succeed in reducing that). 

• A quick detour to North Carolina, where similar efforts won passage of a super resolution by the state Democratic Party. We’re comparing notes, and have learned that in that state, the party Resolutions Committee makeup is formed semi-democratically, while in California, every single member of that and other committees is appointed by the party chair! 

On the state Capitol front, a long and frustrating engagement in the state Legislature ended on Oct. 7, with Gov. Newsom signing AB 715, which will crack down on the freedom to teach about Palestine under the guise of fighting antisemitism. Largely a battle for the votes of the mostly Democrat “diversity caucus” members, hundreds turned out in Sacramento to testify at committee hearings. It got a lot of coverage, much of it misleading in asking whether it would effectively prevent antisemitism while accepting false premises about the subject. Here’s an opinion piece I self-published in August after it was first accepted, then rejected by the Sacramento Bee. And here is a recent piece from Jewish Currents that sums up the larger issues really well. Related battles in Sacramento will surely continue.

Meanwhile, Congress may end up being the last bastion of support for Israeli occupation, apartheid and genocide, but there’s growing ferment, way beyond what would have been thinkable only a few years—or even one year—ago. While none of the following are likely to pass, they are evidence of change.

• A series of “joint resolutions of disapproval” spearheaded by Bernie Sanders, aimed at stopping some arms transfers to Israel, maxed out at twenty seven supporters – a majority of Senate Democrats – in July. Notably, several large unions, including SEIU and UE, came out in support—evidence of a healthy break from labor’s traditional fealty to U.S. militarism. Even more unions were early backers of the demand for cease-fire in Gaza by early 2024, when it still meant something.

• H.R. 3565, the Block the Bombs Act, continues to attract co-sponsors, now up to fifty six, all Democrats, including twelve from California. It too would stop “offensive” arms transfers—a positive step but based on a phony distinction, as even purely “defensive” weapons enable aggressors to act offensively with more impunity.

• H.R. 2411, to restore funding for UN humanitarian support for Palestinian refugees in Gaza and elsewhere, has seventy House backers, all Democrats. 

• Various other bills and resolutions, for instance H.R. 3045, to impose sanctions on violent Israeli West Bank settlers (102 Democrats) have even more support, but notably not from the most consistent supporters of Palestinian freedom like Rep. Rashida Tlaib, presumably because they typically reinforce overall support for Israel and U.S. policy. 

• In the best recent news: On Nov. 13, Tlaib introduced H.Res. 876: Recognizing the genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza. It demands adherence to international law, no arms for genocide, sanctions on offenders and more, with twenty (!!!) original co-sponsors (only Ro Khanna and Lateefa Simon from California).  Read it! And prepare to engage in a loud campaign to win more. Here’s a call to action.

This progress in CDP and Congress, limited as it is, clearly reflects a much larger, accelerating shift in public opinion since October 2023. Highlights of an IMEU survey released last month: 72 percent of Democratic voters agree that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza; only 7 percent support continued taxes going to the Israeli military, with 71 percent opposed; 76 percent support a ban on extending credit to the country through the purchase of Israel bonds; 65 percent support sanctions against Israeli officials, 13 percent oppose. For more such statistics see an August LA Times piece by Prof. George Bisharat.

A final note: The legislation cited has had almost exclusively Democratic support, but public opinion has been evolving in the same direction among Republican voters as well.  A growing cadre of hard right Republican legislators and influencers has suddenly come out in opposition to U.S. support for Israel’s genocide. These include people like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Marjorie Taylor Green and perhaps even the late Charlie Kirk. While authentic horror at the sight of mutilated and starving babies may be part of the explanation, wariness is in order when a large part of their rhetoric centers on MAGA’s “America first” ideology, in which support for Israel is seen as an impediment to U.S. world domination generally, and vague or not so vague blame for failed policy is pinned on “Jewish power,” not the interests of large capital, especially the military industry.

United States labor history is mostly a history of defeats. If that were not true our country would more closely resemble Sweden, with its high union density, social democratic culture and cradle to grave free health care. I used to soften the blow of this information to my community college labor studies students with the proviso that nonetheless the U.S. working class has won some important, lasting victories along the way; and if that were not true the United States would more closely resemble Germany and Italy in the 1930s, with their crushed working class organizations and repressive surveillance state. 

Unfortunately. since my retirement from teaching a couple years ago the impact of our continued and accelerating defeats has eroded what remained of those victories to the point we are now rapidly losing their democratic legacy and headed downhill on fast skis toward a fascist America. And since similar forces are at work elsewhere in the global capitalist economy, Sweden no longer provides quite the exemplary utopian example it once did (it now has small co-pays for office visits and drugs), and Germany seems to be forgetting its own historical lessons.

Be heartened

But as we are have learned in recent weeks, with the largest single day demonstration in US history (No Kings), and the people-powered victory of democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani over billionaire cash and fear-mongering in the New York mayoral race (and its echo in Seattle), a growing number of people understand the dangers we are facing and are committing themselves to fighting back with effective forms of action. I am heartened by this; we all should be. We will need this scale of continued participation and many more wins in the contests with fascist billionaires on all fronts before we can restore the democratic institutions that are being destroyed before our eyes and build a better society in place of the one we’re saddled with.

On election night I went to an Oakland brewery where East Bay DSA members were gathering for a Mamdani victory watch party. In line for a locally produced beer, I stood next to a comrade with whom I was slightly acquainted. I expressed the hope that Proposition 50 would be winning along with Mamdani to make for a very good evening. She said, “It will be great if Mamdani wins, but I don’t care about Prop 50. It won’t do anything, and I didn’t vote.”

I wasn’t surprised; I knew that her political north star was Palestine, and that she, like millions of others, had refused to vote for Kamala Harris over the issue. At that time, before the 2024 election, she had told me, “I want to see the United States brought to its knees.” I had responded that the majority of the United States population was working class, and that I wanted the U.S. ruling class to be brought to its knees, not the country itself. I agreed with her critique of Harris on the international side of things, but, I had said, a presidential election is also about what happens nationally. The rapid destruction of the labor movement and immigrant rights were on the agenda if Trump wins. And a fascist America would not create more space for the fight for Palestinian liberation; more likely the opposite. She remained unconvinced, succumbing to a cynical belief shared by millions of working class Americans that elections simply can’t help them. 

Life and death

Although I empathized with the feeling, my practical experience as a union staffer for three decades taught me otherwise. I had little direct knowledge of the internal functioning of government before becoming active in the labor movement as a rank and filer, elected leader and staffer. Until then I would not have been able to tell you what the Department of Labor did, or the National Labor Relations Board, or the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, or how much the appointments to those bodies by Democratic and Republican regimes mattered for the daily lives of workers and their families. 

And that’s just labor-related agencies of government. Federal departments like Health and Human Services, Education, Veteran Affairs, and Housing and Urban Development, all under attack by the Trump regime, also have deep impacts on the quality of life—and indeed often mean the difference between life and death—for millions.

Union members who pay attention to the information provided them by their unions understand these things. But labor represents just ten percent of the workforce and has less reach beyond its shrinking margins compared to what it once could do. My DSA comrade at the brewery had never been in a union, and spent a lot more time thinking about US imperialism than about the role of the working class in struggling for socialism in the heart of the beast. That’s not a bad thing, but it doesn’t provide a complete picture of how we can effectively fight capital.

As we stood in line together, moving it seemed as slowly toward our beers as toward a socialist America, I persisted, perhaps to the point of obnoxiousness, saying that we can’t give up any of the tools at our disposal in our fight against fascism. She believed the only solution was to get into the streets. I agreed with the centrality of demonstrations and direct action, but argued that the courts, elections and pressure on politicians we’ve helped to elect are all weapons in the class struggle, and if we refuse to participate in any of these activities they become tools wielded against us without a fight. We lose. 

Elect Mamdanis, not Pelosis

Prop 50 did win, of course. So now California has likely offset the move in Texas to rig five congressional district seats. What good will this do? It partly depends on who occupies those seats. If it’s five neoliberal Democrats the difference won’t be as big on some key issues, like continuing to arm or not the American empire and its proxies. Even with neoliberal Democrats, it can matter, however, on rebuilding the helping institutions of government that the fascists are trying to destroy, and whether the labor movement has the space and a fighting chance to organize going forward. 

But there’s another possibility with these seats: we could elect Mamdanis instead of Pelosis. That possibility doesn’t exist within the fascist Republican Party; it does within the Democratic Party. We have less than a year to find progressive Democrats and run winning campaigns with them. Continue to get out into the streets? Absolutely. But the ability to get into the streets without being beaten, cuffed and taken away to some undisclosed location by unidentified armed men in masks may just depend on who’s in the seats of Congress, along with local government. 

Although labor history is a sobering reminder of the usual balance of forces in capitalist society, we shouldn’t help the other side stack the deck. We need to be in every game to win.

Zohran Mamdani was just elected Mayor of New York City. He’s not the first Democratic Socialist to win a prominent office, and arguably other office-holders wield more power—Bernie Sanders as a U.S. Senator, Alexandria Ocasio Cortez as a Representative—but what makes Zohran different is how he got there. As he himself put it at DSA’s national convention in 2023, he has been able to stand against the immense power of capital because he has DSA at his back. Our members raised him into office originally, we catalyzed his mayoral run, and we could not be prouder of how he exemplifies our theory of change.

In the U.S., nobody needs to get a political party’s permission to declare themselves a candidate of that party. In theory, members of the party would quickly filter out candidates that had never been active or politically aligned, favoring more known quantities. But in the 1970s and 80s, political parties put increasing emphasis on the mass communications tactics that frankly plague us today—starting with mailhouses, now taking the form of text message epistles buzzing your phone hourly from your “friends” in high places. As Robert D. Putnam chronicled in his landmark thesis Bowling Alone in 2000, political engagement subsided alongside social engagement, generally. Political differences person to person are now rarely about policy, they’re more about identity as a prefabricated product (‘Take this quizlet to see what political character you are!’).

With communications mattering at least as much as official endorsement, politics organized by the vested political parties have splintered, both right and left. The mainstream media has tried its level best to spook liberal audiences by comparing DSA to the Tea Party, but here’s the thing —Americans are desperate for change. With rural hospitals shutting down and biblical-styled catastrophes clobbering every region, they’re dying for it. They know this system is not working for anybody but the elite, and where they differ most is who they imagine those remote and inaccessible elites to be.

Since supporting Bernie Sanders in 2016, DSA has been the leading force in electing hundreds of city council members, school board trustees, county supervisors, state assembly members and a handful of congressional representatives. Each time, we have done so not because we received permission from a local party authority, but because we organized our members and allied working class interests to speak directly to the working class. Yes, we produce mass communications (Zohran’s campaign comms were genius) but our anchor is our commitment to knocking on doors, bringing our neighbors in, and staying in connection every day of the year, regardless of where we’re at in the election cycle.

Because politics is so much more than the ballot line. It’s exploring what you believe with others in your community, and then drawing the contrasts that take shape in votes, by us and by our elected representatives. It’s voicing those politics in protest, and it’s demonstrating those politics in solidarity on the picket line. This is what a party can be. You just need to come through.

Kent Wong died on October 8, 2025. He was sixty-nine years old. The director of the influential UCLA Labor Center for thirty years, he oversaw its expansion from four to forty staff and a corresponding growth in influence in Los Angeles and statewide politics. He was the fierce and effective advocate for expansion of the UC labor centers from two campuses to all of them. His memorial service at L.A. Trade Tech College on November 15 was attended by more than a thousand mourners.—Editor

DSA-LA is deeply saddened by the loss of Kent Wong, a longtime activist and powerful leader in the labor and immigrant rights movements. Kent was a tremendous force for justice, and he leaves behind a strong foundation for us to continue the struggle and apply all that he taught us. Kent was an uncompromising and tireless fighter for workers, immigrants, students, and others of the most vulnerable in our community.

My powerful journey with Kent Wong encompassed most of my adult activist life. I first met Kent in the mid-1990s, when I was Workers’ Rights Project Director for the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights (CHIRLA). We had started the movement to organize day laborers and I reached out to Kent to ask him for support to connect us with the L.A. labor movement. Since that first encounter, Kent and I embarked on a 30-year journey where he became my close friend, confidant, director and mentor.

Kent believed strongly that there is no greater power than when workers come together and organize. He was one of the early pioneers of integrating immigrant workers to transform the labor movement. You would always find Kent at every picket line, union strike action and major mobilization. For him, holding up a picket sign was a powerful weapon for justice. Kent also embraced and supported the efforts of worker centers and saw them as a part of the labor movement.

As an educator, Kent’s vision was to create the next generation of leaders in the labor, immigrant rights and social justice movements. Through his leadership, we created a Labor Studies Minor that grew into a vibrant B.A. program. Last month, we officially became a Labor Studies Department, the first one in the UC system. Kent had a vision to launch labor centers beyond he existing ones at Berkeley and UCLA. Today, there is a labor center in every UC campus.

On a global level, Kent was much beloved by the labor movements of other countries. He developed solidarity work between the U.S unions with the labor movements in China, Vietnam and Japan. I am grateful to have worked with Kent on a two-year project with the trade unions in Vietnam. I witnessed how much love and solidarity the workers of the world had for Kent.

As an immigrant rights activist, Kent was always an uncompromising champion for the young leaders of the Dream activist movement. He worked with undocumented student leaders at UCLA to create IDEAS, the first ever campus student organization to represent them. Kent established the UCLA Dream Resource Center (DRC) as part of the Labor Center. The DRC has provided emerging leaders a safe and empowering space to create impactful social, policy, and narrative change. In 2011, Kent worked with young immigrant leaders to launch Dream Summer, the only national fellowship program for undocumented students. Over the past 14 years, Dream Summer has built an alumni network of over 1,000 immigrant rights leaders.

On a personal level, Kent embraced me for who I was – a soft spoken and quiet servant leader who prefers to work from behind the scenes. He always challenged me, however, to step up and make my voice heard whenever the moment called for it. He supported my work with DSA-LA and he believed in its vision of organizing to build a world where everyone can live a life of dignity, free from injustice and capitalist exploitation. Kent represented for me the true meaning of deep camaraderie and radical solidarity.

Our hearts go out to Kent’s family, close friends, and all who were touched by him. Today we honor Kent, and we continue forward in the path that he created for us to fight for a better world.

Rest in Power, Kent Wong.

In the months leading up to the New York City mayoral election, there had been some unease in leftist online spaces about the possible results. Polling consistently showed for months that Cuomo was running behind Mamdani, and it may not have even mattered if the race narrowed to the two men. No, the anxiety over the election results was not whether Zohran Mamdani was going to win, but how Mamdani would govern. Every statement was scrutinized for possible concessions; every compromise seemed to portend even more.

Before the primary election, the dream of a leftist mayor could bathe in the promise of his most ambitious proposals without having to dwell on the realities of politics. Now that the general election is over, these very real concerns will need to be confronted, and those who decry electoral work (or of running DSA candidates on the Democratic party line) seem ready to call out any betrayal of the DSA by Mamdani. But  it’s important to first understand what a ‘betrayal of DSA’ would look like, or even mean. 

I’ve heard a similar spiel answer this question countless times at general chapter meetings and branch meetings, and in conversations with the press and interested non-members – what is DSA? The response generally includes some of the following phrases: We are a multi-tendency, multi-caucus organization; we are a mass-politics organization that is dedicated to anti-capitalism, anti-racism, and anti-imperialism; we include people from a broad range of ideological backgrounds on the left. Sometimes people talk about our ‘agenda’ in a local context, and sometimes they talk about national policy goals, like a Green New Deal or universal health insurance. Sometimes people talk about concrete next steps, and sometimes they talk about long-term ideals, like democratizing the workplace or decommodifying housing. All of this is to say that many people have overlapping, yet still different, ideas about who and what we are as an organization, and why we exist. These definitions are all true, but not completely true. How, then, can we be ‘betrayed?’ 

To start off with an obvious example, Mamdani could cancel his membership and denounce the DSA. Maybe he will do this after some huge break with NYC-DSA leadership in the future; but I doubt it. 

Oftentimes, activists will talk about an elected official ‘betraying’ their constituents. This may take the form of accusing them of abandoning their campaign promises, or opposing what they had promised to support. Other times, activists just use the language of the ‘betrayal’ to mean that policies which they oppose are harming constituents. Plenty of MAGA activists will accuse left-wing politicians of ‘betraying’ America by allowing ‘open borders.’ 

In this case, Mamdani will almost assuredly be accused of betraying New York by the right and center when he simply pursues the policies he has campaigned on. But in the former, there could also be campaign policy reversals that may be considered a betrayal of DSA. 

The New York Times asked Gustavo Gordillo, co-chair of NYC-DSA, about Mamdani’s then recent policy choices and whether they would alienate him from cadre membership.

The mayor-elect has made well-documented overtures to the business world, telling leaders in private meetings that he would discourage the use of the phrase, “globalize the intifada,” and was open to funding his proposals by means other than tax increases. He has also offered to keep Jessica Tisch, scion of a billionaire New York family, as police commissioner.

So far, none of these moves have angered Mr. Mamdani’s base. But Gustavo Gordillo, the co-chair of the New York City Democratic Socialists of America, said there was a line that Mr. Mamdani could not cross. 

“Siding with the 1 percent over his base and the rest of the city is what would really pose problems to his governing coalition,” Mr. Gordillo said.

While none of the issues mentioned were part of the core affordability agenda (except, arguably, taxing the rich, although one could argue the spending is what matters more than the revenue raising), Gordillo makes clear that it’s more about the stance of the mayoralty and with whom it positions itself that will determine whether there is a betrayal. But what about the specific policies?

I think this is a gray area because of the nature of politics. In any negotiation, political or otherwise, you always demand more than you think you’re going to get. The other side will assuredly do the same. When the other side scoffs at your proposal, don’t offer concessions before they’ve made a counter-offer. So, with this in mind, it’s possible to see that not all of Mamdani’s agenda will get enacted, or that he even thought these policies could be enacted. If you want to lower universal pre-K from four years to three, you don’t ask for 3K. The other side will always fight expansions of welfare programs, so Mamdani might as well stake out a maximalist demand, knowing that he may have to negotiate down to a phased-in timeline or something later than 6 weeks. Would settling for less be considered a betrayal of the campaign promise, and therefore DSA? It probably depends on how much is compromised.

By now, the reader may feel the framework I have outlined here is nothing more than a slippery slope into rejecting accountability for our electeds. Rather than arguing that social democracy is good enough, I am asking us to think more fundamentally about what we are as an organization, and what expectations members can make of others. Consider first, for example, the differences between NYC-DSA and the national DSA’s agenda. 

Time and again, both New York and national political media sought to tie Mamdani to planks of the DSA’s platform. The New York Post accused him of dodging questions about enforcing misdemeanors. NPR at least had the decency to quote our national website when they sought to define DSA’s priorities. When pressed on his position on nationals, Mamdani always clarified that his platform is on his campaign website, not on DSA’s. NYC-DSA leadership has also pointed to discrepancies between the chapter and national. The differences between the two reflect the varied backgrounds and experiences of members from across the country, and how delegates sought to shape national priorities at successive conventions. Part of the backgrounds and experiences that some delegates brought reflect a dearth of political power or opportunity from their chapters’ region; moreover, the political ideologies and tendencies which guide strategies in rural or suburban America no doubt differ from that of blue state, urban organizers. Again, these are all parts of DSA, but not completely DSA. 

If our organization includes people who describe themselves as communists, Marxist-Leninists, and democratic socialists, it means that our organization will have long-standing disagreements over goals, practices, strategies, and more. When a chapter endorses a candidate for office, though, they are not endorsing a multitude – they are endorsing a single person who is from one of those tendencies, or doesn’t clearly identify with any one of them. When a democratic socialist candidate who believes in a dirty break strategy, for example, gets elected and governs as a democratic socialist who believes in the dirty break strategy, it shouldn’t come as a surprise. It should also come as no surprise that the Maoists or Trotskyists who believe in a clean break would find reason to disagree with this new elected official. But when an organization contains so many multitudes and allows for diversity of thought, it also means that the accusation of ‘betrayal’ is harder to justify. A democratic socialist elected official who governs according to their own beliefs is not betraying the other factions within DSA by not suddenly adopting someone else’s beliefs. You can disagree with someone in shades or degrees, and still appreciate the capacity of your organization to put forward candidates who will advance a movement that allows for greater consideration of left-wing ideas. 

As the Mamdani mayoralty will soon take hold, we should hold true to our vision of a better future and demand the most that we can from him. We do this as we demand the city council, state legislature, and Governor Hochul to work with him, too. That there will be compromises made to his campaign platform, we can only assume. I would never counsel anyone to give over absolute trust to a politician. Just remember, though, that if people accuse Mamdani or others of ‘betraying’ DSA, we should ask if there’s good reason to believe it, or if these accusations are just manifestations of  the ideological and strategic disagreements between people that existed long before the election.

The post What Does It Mean to Betray DSA? appeared first on Midwest Socialist.

On Wednesday, November 19th, Hogsett’s ILEA board presented several models that do not solve the real problems that threaten quality public education in Indianapolis. ILEA members, parents, teachers, advocates for […]

[[{“value”:”

By: Kelly Regan & Travis Wayne

ALLSTON, MA – On Monday, November 17, sixty people crossed Allston to assemble at Marsh Plaza on Commonwealth Avenue in response to a flurry of rapid-response organizing by Boston Democratic Socialists of America (DSA). 

Community members rallied after ICE’s abduction of nine Allston Car Wash employees on November 4. The raid disappeared people from families across the community as the Car Wash itself closed its doors. Exhaling into frigid night air, angry community members held up signs that read “Bring Them Home,” “ICE Out of Boston Now,” and “Keep Families Together.”

Days after the raid, Boston University (BU) student Zac Segal took credit on social media for calling in ICE. Segal claims to have been calling ICE for months in an attempt to ensure workers were abducted. 

Segal, president of Boston University’s College Republicans, has faced immense backlash from the local Allston community.

“This abduction in my neighborhood, in our neighborhood, is personal,” shouted Destiney McGrann, who graduated from Boston University and organizes with Allston-Brighton DSA. “How dare a member of BU – my school – participate in this act of terror?”

Another Phase in the Sanctuary Campus Movement

Members of the Back Bay Young Democratic Socialists of America (YDSA) mobilized students to the rally. Among them were many students who were themselves vulnerable to abduction abetted by Boston University. 

The institution still refuses to declare itself a sanctuary campus to protect its own immigrant students amidst abductions in its backyard.

“We demand that BU enact policies that they are legally able to enact, to safeguard its community from federal overreach,” said one student organizer. They also noted that, “on the BU campus, over 2000 students have signed the YDSA petition to make BU a sanctuary campus.”

For Boston University students, the organizing campaign to compel the institution harboring Zac Segal a sanctuary campus stretches back to the beginning of the year – when federal attacks began.  

YDSA launched the campaign immediately after Trump took power, echoing back to the 2016-2017 Sanctuary Campus movement, before escalating in April 2025. 

The Sanctuary Campus campaign reached an end-of-winter high point on Marsh Plaza, in the same spot where DSA would rally students and community members in the cold November night several months of federal attacks later. On April 3, hundreds of Boston University students and faculty walked out of classes to assemble at Marsh Plaza to demand a sanctuary campus. Some students conducted a sit-in, which Boston University used to crack down on YDSA, before forty autonomous actors staged a direct action to escalate even further and with greater risk against Boston University in response to the university’s repression on April 16.

After suspending YDSA on April 7, which later regrouped during the summer in the wider Back Bay, Boston University went back to doing nothing: refusing to make any change to make the campus a sanctuary. 

People continued to be abducted – including, devastatingly, nine workers at the Allston Car Wash just ten minutes from campus. 

“ICE is a machine that is shrinking people’s lives,” said Bonnie Jin, co-chair of Boston DSA, “We’re making a parent into a case number, a neighbor into a risk. It’s designed to silence, but we were not built, Boston, for silence.”

Towards Community Defense

Back Bay YDSA already planned and organized a walkout for the end of the week: November 20. That’s just the first action. No one stands under any assumption that the moment constitutes anything but a new phase of pressure on Boston University.

“If you’re mad, you should feel the full weight of your anger,” said Hank, a pseudonym to protect one student vulnerable to ICE who stayed home from the rally for their own safety. “Use that anger to lead you to take you to the next step, to organize your neighborhood, your workplace and your campus. Work hard for a better tomorrow.” 

The Allston community is gripped with the rage that Hank calls for – at Boston University, and at the federal government. Rally organizers listed off the organizations to become involved with: DSA, for organizing; Boston Immigration Justice Accompaniment Network (BIJAN), for mutual aid; and LUCE, for ICE Watch. McGrann roused the crowd to shout together:

“When we refuse to bow down, we win. Together, we keep us safe… so today, I beg you to make this commitment to protecting your neighborhood.”

The rally descended into a moment of silence, for the people stolen, before the crowd dispersed into smaller conversations. Jin put the crowd’s sentiment simply:

“Our coworkers are not collateral and our city is not a hunting ground.”

Kelly Regan is a member of the Allston-Brighton branch of Boston DSA. 

Travis Wayne is the managing editor of Working Mass and a member of the Somerville branch of Boston DSA. 

The post Allston Community Seethes and Rallies After ICE Abduction of Allston Car Wash Workers appeared first on Working Mass.

“}]] 

With record member turnout, and 96 percent of voters in favor, Buffalo DSA has voted to endorse Adam Bojak for New York State Assembly in District 149. The Buffalo DSA Steering Committee looks forward to working with Adam and his campaign toward a socialist future for Western New York.

Adam has been a dedicated, dues-paying member of Buffalo DSA since 2017. A leader in the chapter’s early years, and previously endorsed for Assembly in 2020, he has organized primarily with our Infrastructure (formerly Housing) and Electoral Committees. Adam’s commitment to DSA and its principles is also evident across a decade of fighting for the working class. In addition to serving as assigned counsel in Family Court, he takes on tenant legal cases pro bono. Over the past decade, he has never charged a housing justice client for services.

Through a robust endorsement process, the chapter determined that Adam’s campaign shares our goals for housing justice, universal healthcare, labor rights, and social equity. Additionally, despite New York’s undemocratic closed primaries and ballot access hurdles hindering Buffalo DSA’s political independence, the campaign nonetheless shows potential to build toward a true workers’ party. For too long, Republicans and Democrats alike have exploited our class and ignored our needs; Adam’s proud, socialist campaign offers us new ways to fight the capitalist status quo and agitate the masses.

Last, but not least, the incredible turnout we saw in this vote shows the strength of the American socialist movement, and of our organization. We urge all members and inspired supporters to help Buffalo DSA sustain our organizing–not just for Adam, but for our entire political project. This is our chance to build on our momentum for Good Cause Eviction and the New York Health Act, and continue to support workplace organizing and the labor movement. 

We need you. Join DSA today and get involved in our committee work, to learn the same skills and principles that brought Adam’s campaign to life.

On Halloween, the Illinois General Assembly voted on a $1.5 billion funding package for public transit in Chicago. This budget funds the Chicago Transit Authority, Metra, and PACE, in addition to replacing the Regional Transportation Authority with a new board, the Northern Illinois Transit Authority. 

This legislation comes after the Illinois General Assembly failed to fund public transit during its regular session. CTA leadership, workers, and local leaders spent months raising the alarm. The CTA initially projected service cuts of 40%, including cutting more than half of its bus lines and ending or limiting service on most train lines. This apocalyptic estimate was revised down only after the CTA pledged to increase fares and received an infusion of cash from the Regional Transportation Authority. 

As socialists, it shouldn’t be surprising that a state government led not by working people, but by an “actual billionaire”, didn’t bring this crisis to a just conclusion. 

Instead of rushing to fund the city’s transit, a system nearly a million riders rely on every day, the state government – led by Governor J.B. Pritzker – played a game of chicken with leaders of the city and the CTA by hammering out agreements in private up until the last moment, leaving the fate of workers in Chicago uncertain. 

After passing legislation in the eleventh hour, the governor expects us to applaud his benevolence in not firing the gun he pointed at the heads of the city’s workers. He deserves no credit for averting a catastrophe he helped engineer. 

While the increase in the CTA’s budget has been lauded by political leaders in the Democratic Party, it comes at a cost to working people. The methods of revenue raising – sales taxes, toll roads, and increased fares – all come directly from the pocket of workers in Illinois. These regressive taxes place yet more of the state’s tax burden on working class people while the wealthiest people in our state escape paying their fair share, including a proposed tax on the investments of billionaires that was killed by Pritzker himself. 

As the leading socialist organization in Chicago, CDSA has fought for full funding of the CTA and democratic control of our transit. We cannot be satisfied with any budget that forces workers who are given less and less to pay more and more. Until we win a democratic economy controlled by the working class, our minimum demand remains the same no matter what budget crisis threatens our communities: Tax the rich.

The post Illinois Deserves No Applause for Funding the CTA appeared first on Midwest Socialist.