With the passage of the so-called “big beautiful bill,” the poorest of the poor are being told their shelters are no longer funded, their food pantries won’t take them anymore, and their chronic illnesses will lock them into six-digit debts. All the while, one of the same bill’s provisions allows businesses to deduct the full costs of private jets. This type of prioritization is social murder, and we need to think beyond the corporate media and NGOs to build structures that can fight for the future we can – and need – to win.

As union workers in SEIU protested on the Senate lawn to declare, “these cuts kill.” While NOAA’s proposed 2026 budget closes all federally funded weather and climate research labs, the government’s Earth-destroying military budget is set to exceed $1 trillion. Over 130 people in Texas are dead after experienced National Weather Service staffers were offered severance, and the local government rejected flood warning systems due to cost. Social murder is a term coined by Friedrich Engels to describe the deliberate societal forces that bring about a “murder against which none can defend themselves.” Did these Texans die, or were they socially murdered? When a politician signs a paper forbidding a woman from receiving life-saving medical treatment, is it a passive act of someone dying, or is it violent act of someone killing? This bill is not an outlier. It is a crescendo of the austerity politics that have been cutting off community life supports for decades. We cannot allow any spectrum of debate to include costing out that which kills by omission; we can not cost out the lives of our neighbors, coworkers, or families.

Just a handful of private, multi-billion-dollar conglomerates own 90% of all US federal, state, and local media networks. Due to this, all widely broadcast discussions are framed with an unquestioning loyalty to the root narratives behind these highly-profitable social murder policies. Lively debates are held on just what degree people should have to prove their societal worth to allow them access to a doctor. The imposed scarcity framing this conversation is never questioned. Neither Fox News nor CNN, however, speak of scarcity when this same bill pushes nearly eight times the “saved costs” from food access into militarization. Over a trillion of our dollars will be spent every year imposing mass starvation and death upon all the world’s people this US government declares our enemies. Yet, when this same bill makes our incarceration and deportation machine the third-best funded army on the planet, it is seen as “unprecedented.” In the name of “non-partisanship” and “neutrality,” the corporate media’s coverage builds the public consent for our congresspeople to socially murder tens of thousands of Americans. We cannot let the ruling class define the field in which we fight. We have to meet people where they’re at, but we must do so with organizational media that is unafraid to educate, raise expectations, and make demands.

How did you resist the bill likely to be Trump’s longest lasting impact? More of us than ever before called our senators and marched through our cities. However, with the primary cost imposition being withheld votes and bad press, we can’t leave our struggles behind on the streets. Union density and participation is low, and there are no large scale political parties accountable to the working class and marginalized peoples. The only big institutions our angry public has for our defense are NGOs and nonprofits. These institutions are kept separate along the lines of their single issues, and are not accountable to their members. They’re accountable to donors and philanthropists – themselves unaccountable to a strategy. A nonprofit only has the power to ask you or me to call up a politician and tell their office worker what we think. This is not empowering. Much like a demonstration in the public square, it functions as an appeal to power. The capitalist state, purposed on reproducing itself, defines a democracy such that corporations are people and money is speech. The upper echelons of the political class are loyal to the “speech” that makes each of them more wealthy than you or I will ever be. A withheld vote or day of bad press will never speak as loudly as withheld labor and economic leverage. Actions like a strike or a widespread, disciplined, and targeted boycott take vast, connected structures of accountability. For a long term, winning movement, these are the structures we need.

Communities are weaker than ever. We are torn apart every day by the social murder committed by neoliberal policies – incarcerations, evictions, and social service destruction. These crises are amplified exposures of the everyday, not ruptures from the norm. Without an organized and structured community, all we have is the hope that someone else will do something. It will not save us to have awareness, prayers, and praise for the “resilience” of those who endure once the hurt hits close to home. We need to unite and strengthen the few remaining representational organizations like labor unions. Where there are missing structures that could unite people across currently isolated struggles, we need to create them. Tenants unions, students unions, and debtors unions alike can be built and scaled up across decades. These are the institutions we must join into, struggle with, and lead to form a shared horizon for those whom there is not yet a place to be represented. You can’t create a government truly accountable to the people unless the people have unifying structures that exist to empower them. Only when line cooks, tenants, retirees, students, and all those in between are comfortable leveraging their power and solidarity can we create a new society truly beholden to the people.

The post Trump’s Social Murder Bill Passes – Now What? appeared first on Pine & Roses.

On July 11th, LVDSA Co-Chair Shaun Navarro asked Las Vegas Mayor Shelley Berkley a simple question: will you pledge not to collaborate with ICE?

Her answer: “No.”

This answer is unacceptable when our community is living in fear.

We call on Mayor Berkley and the Las Vegas City Council to publicly commit that the city of Las Vegas:

• will not collaborate or enter into an agreement with ICE
• will refuse the use of city resources for ICE transfer or holds
• will take a definitive stand to ensure Las Vegas remains safe for all residents, irrespective of their immigration status

Mayor Berkley also asserted “there is no ICE in Las Vegas”. While this is technically true, it is wildly misleading about the fact that ICE presence is growing in the valley: ICE has a detention center in Henderson, ICE activity has caused Broadacres Market in North Las Vegas to shut down, and ICE detained TikTok star Khaby Lame at Harry Reid International Airport in Clark County’s jurisdiction.

Mayor Berkley called ICE’s activity an “unfortunate situation”. But on July 1st, she also said that she supported Sheriff McMahill’s decision for LVMPD to coordinate with ICE under the federal 287(g) program. This program deputizes local law enforcement to fulfill federal immigration duties, allows LVMPD to detain undocumented people for up to two days to transfer them to ICE custody, and requires LVMPD to report conversations regarding citizenship to ICE within one hour.

While the city doesn’t control LVMPD, they work closely together and the city will be giving them over $185 million over the next year – funding a force that is working directly with ICE.

We believe that families being ripped apart is more than an “unfortunate situation”. Our community is afraid and wants to know that they will be safe and that their elected officials will not collaborate with ICE, which is why Shaun Navarro was met with applause as he asked the Mayor “When they are separating our families, what will you do?”

We invite members of the community to visit lvdsa.org/no-ice to send a letter to the Mayor and City Council with these demands and to join us in the fight to Cancel the ICE Contracts.

Are you fed up with rising rents, low wages, climate inaction, and billionaires hoarding more while we struggle with less? You’re not alone — and you’re not powerless.

We would like to invite you in learning about Democratic Socialism to our Mass Intro event that we are holding on July 27th at the DAAC! Our chapter has existed since 2017 and among other things, we have focused on issues including Labor, Housing, Trans rights, the Environment, Medicare for All, and fighting for the working class in general. 

We will have tacos, speakers, and music that we can all sing along to. Come celebrate Zohran Mamdani’s victory in the New York City Mayor’s Democratic Primary and help build our own Socialist movement in West Michigan.

This event is perfect for:
✅ Newcomers curious about what democratic socialism really means
✅ Anyone ready to get involved in building a better, more just world
✅ Existing members looking to reconnect or bring a friend

Together we can create a better world for all of us if we all work towards building our chapter and collaborating on future projects and events.

Solidarity!

The post Fight Fascism/Build Socialism: Intro to the GRDSA appeared first on Grand Rapids Democratic Socialists of America.

Americans are taught to venerate July 4th as a turning point not only in the history of the Americas, but in human history itself. It supposedly represents the founding of the first modern republic, a nation destined to lead the world into an unparalleled golden age of freedom.

At one time, celebrations of the Fourth of July also included some celebration of universal rights. These include the idea that the United States is defined by its constitution, that there are some things that the government shouldn’t be allowed to do, and that every person is entitled to basic rights under the law. It also included the idea that democratic governance is a good in itself, applicable not only to those living within the borders of the United States, but of everyone in the world yearning to breathe free.

Next year, America will celebrate the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. The celebrations will be overseen by Donald Trump, the single most selfish, myopic, and authoritarian man ever to hold the office of President of the United States. They will take place in the context of his active attempts to destroy American democracy and remake it in his own image.

To the degree that the United States was ever a ‘revolutionary’ republic, that promise is now a distant memory. Any pretext of universalism that one existed (in spite of the many serious flaws of the American experiment) is gone. Republicans have replaced it with a ‘blood and soil’ conception of what it means to be an American, and Democrats are so preoccupied with civility politics that they abandoned the question of what it means to be an American decades ago.

The Independence Day holiday is still inexorably tied to the existence of the United States of America as a nation-state, and to the current policies of its leadership. Furthermore, it can never be extricated from the legacy of the Atlantic slave trade and indigenous genocide, which loom large over any founding myth of the United States. The national founding holiday of the United States of America will never be a day celebrating universal human freedom. That is why, as socialists, we must look to other inspirations for our struggle.

***

Three centuries ago, the European concept of a ‘state’ was inextricable from the concept of its sovereign. In the traditional understanding, the Christian god granted the absolute right to rule a territory to a hereditary monarch. A few exceptions to this rule existed, but they were mostly carved out to protect the traditional rights of institutions such as the Catholic Church and powerful merchant guilds. The concept of a state that derived its legitimacy from a universal idea like self-governance was laughable, and apologists for absolutism openly scoffed at the idea that a state could exist independent from a monarch as anything more than a short-lived and chaotic experiment.

The social force that broke the back of this idea was not the American Revolution. The idea of a merchant republic was familiar to those in Europe during that time, and the notion that the British colonial government of America would be replaced by an oligarchy of wealthy merchants and slave owners was considered radical but not inconceivable by the powers of the Old World.

The more revolutionary project was the one that started in France in 1789. It grew from a demand for equal formal representation for the Third Estate (largely comprising the French middle class) into a radically new conception of what a ‘state’ should be. The storming of the notorious Bastille prison on July 14, 1789 marked a watershed moment in human history. For the first time, the destruction of the old, absolutist European order became not only possible, but inevitable.

The French Revolution was not only a political revolution, but a social one. It sought not to make peace with the old European order, but to abolish it entirely. Its experiments in radical democracy, secular government, and an unyielding demand that the powerful answer for their crimes served as the inspiration for two centuries of popular resistance to colonial, monarchical, and oppressive forms of government.

Over the next two centuries, popular uprisings and mass movements around the world dismantled the power of monarchy to dominate human affairs. This was most notable in the periods following the two world wars, when revolutionary and anti-colonial movements toppled monarchs and freed peoples from foreign dominion. Today, over 80% of the world’s governments have abandoned hereditary monarchy, and a significant portion of the remaining countries maintain a monarch only as a constitutional symbol with little or no political power.

***

The French Revolution informed and influenced nearly every leftist movement of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Karl Marx called it “the most colossal revolution that history has ever known.” During the Russian Revolution, the Bolsheviks were intimately familiar with the details of each stage of the French Revolution. They openly considered themselves the successors to the radical left-wing Jacobin faction, for whom the American socialist magazine of record is named.

The modern French Fifth Republic also traces its roots back to 1789, but the ideals of the period represent something far greater, and we can celebrate the history of republicanism without having to defer to nationalist propaganda or a founding myth. Nor do we as socialists have to apologize for the revolutionary violence of the early French republicans. As noted American humorist Mark Twain wrote in A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur’s Court:

There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.

As free people, it is our right and responsibility to choose what to celebrate in this world. The principles of self governance, universal human rights, freedom from arbitrary rule, and anti-monarchism are the basis for modern socialism. Even as we confront the new horrors of a global system in crisis, we must also remember and celebrate the victories that have brought us to this point. There is no better time to start than right now.

Vive le monde républicain.

The post No Kings appeared first on Midwest Socialist.

By: Lucas Paschall

My story of joining DSA began with my first memory of any living president. Two shoes–both of which unfortunately missed–were launched at George W. Bush’s head. As a seven-year-old child, I obviously could not have been fully aware of precisely why an Iraqi journalist would do that. From what I did gather through the news I watched, I understood that Bush was a man that did not do great things.

As a kid, I was eager to find the rock stars that raised some hell. My dad turned me on to an 80’s classic, The Blues Brothers, because of his uncanny impersonations of the character Elwood Blues. My main takeaway from that movie wasn’t that the bad guy Blues Brothers were bad guys: it’s that they were good guys. That translated over to that moment of George W. Bush, despite my lack of awareness of the “War on Terrorism.” The Blues Brothers broke the rules just like that Iraqi journalist. But they were also rock stars.

Since being a rock star was the coolest thing on Earth, it was only natural that come the summer heading into eighth grade, I became the local militant metalhead. You knew that kid in school too: the annoying one who insisted that Metallica, Rage Against the Machine, and AC/DC were far superior to the garbage music that other kids were listening to. While those around me cringed both because of this and how bad I smelled, I simply laughed at their lackluster inferiority.

My sense of ego would only heighten when my dad took me to my first concert: System of a Down at Pine Knob. I remember being blown away at their sheer energy: the vocalist’s absurd screeches, the hyper-aggressive down-tuned guitar and bass, and an atmosphere where I felt I belonged. Yes, this was my calling card. My newest fandom was alive and well, and I got home to listen to all five albums, back-to-back. As I am listening to these albums now though, there are things I notice that I previously did not realize about this country in which I live. Lines like the following from my personal favorite, “B.Y.O.B.”:

“Why don’t presidents fight the war? Why do they always send the poor?”

Then there are lyrics from “Deer Dance”, a song which describes the horrors of police brutality in the band’s home city of Los Angeles:

“Beyond the Staples Center you can see America

With its tired poor avenging disgrace

Peaceful, loving youth against the brutality

Of plastic existence.”

One particular lyric that I will never forget is from “Boom!”:

“Four thousand hungry children

Leave us per hour from starvation

While billions are spent on bombs

Creating death showers”

This led me to doing some research into what these words meant. Then came a bombshell that was about bombshells: the “War on Terror,” the killing of millions of innocent people in the Middle East, the wrongdoings of the Patriot Act, and so on. I finally had my answer as to why Bush nearly got domed with shoes, and it enraged me.

Heading into high school, I was determined to spread this word to the students around me, to let everyone know how bad this country sucked. From the genocide of Native Americans to current day, I was furious to hear that our country was doing horrendous things. The election of Donald Trump in 2016 only made things worse. Yet, as I went through high school, I still felt powerless: being black-pilled was a real possibility. I started to take the approach that nothing was going to change.

Fast-forward to a couple of years ago, after the turmoil of 2020, and in the middle of Joe Biden’s lackluster presidency. As I saw how Biden failed with his immigration policy and his wet noodle approach to a conservative Supreme Court, it really began to enrage me how we were supposedly going to be back to “normalcy” and “stability” when the administration was doing anything but. That is when–once again–the power of rock stars began to make an impact. Although this time, they were not wielding a Gibson Explorer with Marshall tube amps. This time, it was one man or woman with a banjo or guitar that went behind a chorus of people. Utah Philips was the first one to introduce me to the world of pro-union music.

Growing up, I had heard of unions, but never really took the time to understand what exactly they did, nor the history of them. But after having Philips discuss the powers of one, then having Pete Seeger describe to me the story of the Harlan County War, then to really dive into what Woody Guthrie meant when he said, “This Land is Our Land,” the pieces came together for me to become a democratic socialist.

As I now indulge in reading more political theory and becoming more of an activist than I could have ever imagined, I figured this would be a good time to explain why joining DSA is so important to me. There are several answers, but to keep you from falling asleep, I will give you my main reason: my hometown. New Baltimore, Michigan, home to about 12,000 people, is a fairly affluent city populated by a conservative community. It is a town where people made their money through the trades: blue-collar jobs that they excelled at. There are “progressives” that would gawk at the idea of living in such a town, where our residents couldn’t possibly be saved. Yet I see a town that can be much different.

Our town cannot stand the rich. While corporatism has practically taken over Chesterfield Township — the city south of us — our town does not like being told the poor are to blame. Of course, there are people here who would not spit in the direction of democratic socialism, but I believe that if we’re going to spread this message properly, it is vital that we begin with the people who are democratic socialists in the making but just don’t know it yet. Everyone has the ability to be a rock star; it’s time that they use that energy and take their power back.

From Heavy Metal to Socialism: Why I joined DSA was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

By: Emma Buckley

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not represent the official position of Working Mass.

Over the last several years DSA members have industrialized, embedding themselves into union jobs and helping the labor movement fight for concessions against capitalist greed. DSA members have made a big impact in the rank and file by helping lead new organizing campaigns and pushing for increased militancy within existing unions. This has helped unions make some of the largest gains they’ve had in decades. But at the end of the day, these victories mostly have been limited to concessions on pay and working conditions. While increases in militancy and momentum are meaningful in their own right, these victories remain reforms at the margins, not a challenge to the roots of the capitalist system. If we’re going to improve the lives of all working people, the fight for labor justice will have to transform into a movement beyond the fight for reforms on bread and butter issues.

While the victories won through new organizing and at the bargaining table are meaningful in improving workers’ lives, they fail to resolve the pervasive exploitation and oppression which workers face every day. Winning higher wages matters. However, workers are still servants to their bosses, and the larger issues of racism, sexism, imperialism, and climate catastrophe remain unresolved. Under such harsh conditions, working people need a horizon to fight for beyond the temporary concessions they can win in their next contract. 

Not only are these victories small relative to the comprehensive oppressions workers face under capitalism, but they also remain insecure. Nearly all of the reforms to the National Labor Relations Board won under Biden have been reversed under Trump. Wage gains won by the inspiring, hard fought struggle of workers are constantly eroded by inflation. Capitalists use their positions of power to escalate attacks on workers from all sides: from the new attacks on federal workers; to the expansion of the attacks on immigrant workers; and a thousand other abuses workers face every day. These flagrant assaults on workers’ solidarity occur alongside systemic stagnation of wages and ever-increasing inflation. If workers’ lives are going to be substantially and permanently improved, the labor movement must unite the struggle for immediate reforms with a movement directed towards taking political power away from the owning class. 

Bring DSA to the Labor Movement!

The amendment to the DSA National Labor Committee Consensus Resolution, A Partyist Labor Strategy, was a collaboration between comrades from the Reform and Revolution caucus and the Marxist Unity Group, presenting a revolutionary vision to organize DSA within the labor movement which begins by centering the key political questions. 

The amendment takes on a debate that held huge prominence on the labor left a century ago and has continued to inform labor organizing ever since: Should we reduce the labor struggle to economic demands? We say no. Rather, we must infuse the labor struggle with revolutionary politics in order to make each fight against the boss a fight for the whole working class. 

Proponents of reducing the struggle to economic demands believe that socialists should focus almost entirely on the economic fight to bring workers around to socialism and class struggle. Within the radical labor movement there is a widespread fear that anything more would push away workers and isolate socialists. We certainly believe that socialists should be the best fighters for the achievable economic reforms in each labor struggle; however, it isn’t true that organizing on bread and butter issues is the only way to build power. Our vision is for mass socialist politics, which requires uniting our socialist horizon and the daily struggle into one indivisible movement.

There is certainly a balance to this, as it’s possible to get lost in revolutionary rhetoric and lose relevancy. However, by rooting ourselves in the day to day struggles it is possible to connect shop floor issues to our larger goals in ways that make sense to our co-workers. As rank-and-filers in labor struggles, we often see our most engaged co-workers – those who do the most to support new organizing – are not just motivated by wage and benefit increases. They are also committed to winning back their sense of dignity over the daily injustices of the workplace, and the related potential for unions to address larger issues of racism or sexism on the shop floor. In fact, for the most active rank and file workers, the amount of time they spend fighting for their union does not make sense for the piecemeal gains they are able to push through negotiation. 

If these worker leaders were only motivated by improving their individual paychecks, their energy would probably be better directed towards searching for a higher-paying job. Politicized rank and filers are often written off as just GenZ workers radicalized around BLM, trans rights, or Palestine, however, this is a shallow view of the most active contingent of rank and file activists. We saw in 2016 and 2020 that the vast majority of left-unionists who became radicalized and began organizing for change within their unions did so on the political basis of the Bernie campaigns, not on pure bread-and-butter reforms. Politicized workers are not an anomaly or divorced from the movement, they are the beginnings of a larger movement that we should seek to expand.

To become an active organic leader, and to persist in the face of unrelenting union-busting from management and bureaucratic bullshit from union leadership, worker-leaders need to relate the struggle for immediate improvements to a bigger mission. While DSA members under the rank and file strategy have certainly diligently worked towards developing other rank and file leaders individually or in small groups, DSA can bring many more workers to the labor movement by acting as an organized body which raises the overarching political horizon of the working class taking power. 

However, politicizing the labor movement does not mean DSA members should adopt the strategies of the SEIU and UAW by simply advocating for the Democratic Party. Having long abandoned the working class, Democrats in many ways mimic the model of business unionism, which claims to represent the working class while undercutting workers’ ability to self organize. The Democrats only make empty, symbolic gestures towards economic relief and liberation for the oppressed. As a key step in connecting immediate struggles with a socialist horizon, DSA members should put forward a working class politics that is independent from the Democrats and Republicans, one which points towards socialist politics, a new party, and a mass movement of workers.

Bring the Labor Movement to DSA!

If DSA is going to build an independent party with thousands and eventually millions of union members capable of becoming the heart and soul of a militant labor movement, then we need to dramatically grow the ranks of DSA’s labor activists. Industrialization, the strategy of socialists taking union jobs, has been a good step in this direction and should be continued and expanded; but this alone will not be enough. To grow to the numbers we need, we must recruit union members to DSA instead of relying on DSA members to join unions. 

It is far easier to recruit a union member to DSA than for a DSA member to industrialize, and existing union members already have the trust of the coworkers and union siblings. DSA can become a recognized current fighting to make the labor movement a place where workers can democratically participate. This fighting current would oppose not only the bosses, but also business unionists and the Democratic Party, which seek to keep working people passive in their own movement in order to quietly capitulate to capitalist and imperialist interests.

Business unionists and the Democratic Party both excel at making workers feel powerless while pushing their agitation into passive support for bureaucratic leaders. The increasingly low voter turnout in elections shows that nearly half of the working class feels completely cut out, apathetic, and unable to meaningfully participate in our political system. It’s DSA’s job to provide a clear, differentiated example of how we can fight against the authoritarianism of the bosses and the chauvinist political leaders from the bottom up, making the labor movement the field for everyday workers to meaningfully participate in political activity.

Even workers that don’t join DSA will be motivated into activity by seeing an active and organized contingent of their coworkers fighting for such an expanded vision of the labor movement. However, for them to be able to meaningfully participate, we have to fight to create robust union democracy that establishes member control of bargaining, elected and active stewards and shop representatives, and member control over the unions political endorsements. 

If workers recognize DSA as the force in their unions fighting consistently for immediate workplace improvements, standing up for the rights of their immigrant, trans, and marginalized co-workers, leading campaigns for union democracy and reform, pushing to expand the labor struggle to unorganized shops and into rural areas, and tying all this into a larger political vision, they will recognize that DSA is an organization worth joining.

Bring the NLC to Our Chapters!

It makes very little sense for the NLC to operate as a body completely separate from the work that thousands of DSA labor organizers conduct through their chapters. Our national committees should create deeper ties to local chapters, operating campaigns not through one separate national NLC phone banking list, but through how we traditionally organize campaigns in our unions – through communication at each locale with organic leaders, connecting to each chapter’s organizing conditions. The amendment, A Partyist Labor Strategy, puts forward an organizational plan to coordinate DSA members in the labor movement, connecting the NLC to chapters and connecting DSA members by industry and by large national unions where it makes sense. 

Once we accept that DSA’s labor work must tie fights for immediate wins in the workplace and for reforms in the unions to a larger political project, we still must answer the question: how do we make this happen? Our amendment answers this by calling for changes to the structure of DSA’s labor work, including the structure of the National Labor Commission and the relation between the NLC and the chapter labor formations. We must connect the NLC to chapters and connect DSA members organizing with the same industries or national unions.

This is a large undertaking and can only be accomplished by implementing small logistical steps and connecting what we’ve already built. Many local chapters already have local industrial sections, whether they’re called educators meet up, healthcare workers meeting, or logistics subcommittee, but it’s up to the NLC to connect these local groups nationally with a common communication platform and develop a toolkit for chapters that do not already have these formations.

Once connected, these groups will be better situated to nationally develop the labor movement in their industry or major union through democratic coordination: they will be better equipped to implement trainings, push for contract language, or organize to pass resolutions in their locals. The NLC could facilitate this by creating a library for DSA labor organizers to keep training resources and template resolutions. By connecting through their national industrial section and using NLC resources, DSA members will be able to fight for more robust internal democracy as part of reform movements and act as a bottom up force to push labor leaders past capitulation and reformism. Even a handful of DSA members organizing together within an industry or national union will immediately be a touchpoint for reaching non-DSA layers of progressive and reform-minded workers within that industry or union. As each group takes shape in their industry or national union, we will have the skeleton of a national, comprehensive, and systematic fight for control of the entire labor movement.

Likewise, this process will help the NLC improve its ability to continue previous projects such as Labor for an Arms Embargo, Mask Off Maersk, and the development of local EWOCs. The NLC shouldn’t be an obscure body DSA labor organizers have to seek out instead, it should be part of our chapter ecosystem, a connective tissue for our labor work around the country. Combining a new orientation which centers a political approach and these structural changes, we will take the first meaningful steps towards a new DSA labor movement.

There is No Such Thing as Apolitical

Opponents of this amendment will state that the attempt to politicize the labor movement will limit our ability to reach a broad political spectrum of workers, and that leading with our socialist politics will only isolate us. However, won’t workers be more motivated by a movement actually fighting for their interests? The attempt to hide ourselves and our politics in the movements of liberals and reformists only allows liberal and reformist politics to remain dominant. Time and time again, we have seen that liberal politics have failed to sustain a democratic mass movement. Workers are looking for something different because they are looking for results.

The major revolutionary strains of socialism a century ago, from Lenin and the Bolsheviks in Russia to figures such as Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht in Germany, consistently fought against subsumming the labor movement’s socialist politics within purely economistic demands. While necessary to fight for, the economic concessions we can win will never be enough to match the rise in automation, increasing authoritarianism, and the global climate crisis. 

In the early twentieth century, ideological opponents to the “Politicals” at the time were best exemplified by the trade unionists in Britain. The UK trade unionists often only represented workers in skilled trades. Every economic win of these trade unionists was divorced from larger political goals and, as a result, remained isolated within these unions instead of spreading through the class. The lack of a larger political movement that could expand the struggles of trade unionists to the working class at large meant that the benefits of these struggles did not make it to the many workers; in particular, it was disproportionately those from oppressed national backgrounds who were left unrepresented. Not only was this unjust, but by leaving a large section of the workforce behind to remain underpaid, these unionists undercut their own efforts by giving capitalists a steady supply of cheaper labor.

Less than a quarter of the workforce in the US today is represented by unions. Simply tailing union struggles without expanding on them through working class politics leaves behind every US worker who isn’t lucky enough to secure one of the few jobs with representation. DSA must help grow the labor movement into a fighting mass movement. We do that not by hiding our politics, but by putting our politics into practice. Creating a mass movement is not an easy task that can be achieved in a year, but if we center politics in our labor work while building our structures to work systematically as a national force, DSA can become the beating heart that workers need to expand their struggle.

Emma Buckley is a member of the New Seasons Labor Union, Portland DSA, and the DSA caucus Reform & Revolution.

The post OPINION: DSA Can Bring Socialism to the Shop Floor  appeared first on Working Mass.