Skip to main content
the logo of Twin Cities DSA

TCDSA 2024 Online Experience Survey

Twin Cities DSA is currently collecting user feedback for some of our online platforms. Filling out this form is extremely helpful! You will be directly impacting our work going forward. There’s also opportunities to get involved or reach out for training at the end. There will be a Tech Ops zoom meeting to talk about […]
the logo of Detroit Socialist -- Detroit DSA

Making the Rust Belt Green Through a Federal Great Lakes Authority

Introduction by Jane Slaughter

In early 2019 Detroit DSA published a bold plan to “make Detroit the engine of a Green New Deal.” The idea was to take the manufacturing expertise of the Rust Belt, combined with the environmental advantages of the Great Lakes region, and “solve the Rust Belt’s interlocking economic and ecological crises.”

We called for a federal “Great Lakes Authority,” modeled on the Tennessee Valley Authority established in the 1930s, that could marshal resources to fight climate change through the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs. As the author wrote, “Massive amounts of green infrastructure must be built to avert climate catastrophe. It should be built here, in places like Detroit, where millions of people already have manufacturing expertise and experience.”

We also outlined the activism that led to the writing of our Green New Deal plan. It started with DSA-led protests over GM’s plan to close its Poletown plant, which drew 400 people. We called for the city, which in the 1980s had torn down whole neighborhoods to gift the land to GM, to take over the plant by eminent domain if necessary.

Coming out of a small group discussion at our chapter’s general meeting September 7, we reprint these articles as inspiring examples of thinking big and acting big to work to save the planet. Thanks to Aaron Stark for leading the political education discussion at the chapter meeting.

Making the Rust Belt Green Through a Federal Great Lakes Authority

Feb 25, 2019

By Natasha J. Fernández-Silber

Detroit DSA has begun organizing in earnest around a bold initiative to “Make the Rust Belt Green.” In collaboration with local elected officials and its coalition partners, Detroit DSA is calling for the creation of a new federal agency, in the vein of the Tennessee Valley Authority, called the “Great Lakes Authority.” The GLA would be a regional planning agency enacted under the umbrella of the “Green New Deal.” Its mandate: to bring green union jobs and economic development to the Midwest.

The Great Lakes Authority represents a credible way to bring back quality manufacturing jobs to the Midwest. Massive amounts of green infrastructure must be built to avert climate catastrophe. It should be built here, in places like Detroit, where millions of people already have manufacturing expertise and experience.

The Great Lakes region includes all of Michigan, as well as portions of Illinois, Indiana, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. It is home to vast natural resources, including, most obviously, the Great Lakes, which contain over one-fifth of the freshwater on the planet, and provide potable water to over 40 million people. The region is also an agricultural powerhouse, with more than 55 million acres of productive land, and a bastion of low-carbon recreational options.

The Great Lakes region overlaps substantially with what has come to be known as the “Rust Belt.” As the grim moniker suggests, the Rust Belt has been ravaged for decades by free trade deals, deindustrialization, and corporate pollution. The region’s economy was further decimated in 2008 by the Great Recession, from which it has yet to recover.

This long economic decline has produced a host of calamities for the region. The Rust Belt has some of the oldest and most degraded infrastructure in the nation. Millions of its residents live without clean air, water, or both. Its abundant lakes, rivers, and ecosystems are increasingly under-protected. As desperation mounts, states have begun privatizing their natural resources. Michigan, for example, now authorizes Nestle to pump virtually unlimited amounts of groundwater from an aquifer in the western part of state. It uses that water to make hundreds of million of dollars in profits from its Ice Mountain bottled water brand. Meanwhile, the water crises in Flint and Detroit go unresolved.

There can be little doubt that targeted federal resources are required to solve the Rust Belt’s interlocking economic and ecological crises. And we need only look to the first New Deal to understand what is possible. In 1933, Congress created the Tennessee Valley Authority, the nation’s first regional planning agency. Its mandate was to bring jobs and economic development to the Tennessee Valley, a region particularly devastated by the Great Depression.

The region faced continual flooding, deforestation, and land erosion, and its rural residents lacked basic modern infrastructure like electricity and running water. In what is perhaps the most soaring success of the entire New Deal era, between 1933 and 1934 the TVA built 16 hydroelectric dams in the Tennessee Valley, which reduced flooding and soil erosion and provided electricity to millions of residents. By 1934, more than 9,000 people were employed through the TVA on these projects and others. Over time, the TVA evolved into the largest publicly-owned utility in the United States, and today services customers in Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, Kentucky, Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia.

Like the TVA, the Great Lakes Authority (GLA) would be a regional planning agency designed to funnel federal resources (under local control) to the Rust Belt. Those funds would be devoted to large-scale green manufacturing (e.g., of electric buses, cars, and trains); retooling idled factories (like GM’s recently “unallocated” plants in Warren, Detroit, and Lordstown); green housing construction and weatherization; generating green, renewable energy (e.g., wind, solar, and hydro); repairing or replacing the water infrastructure in places like Flint and Detroit; building green infrastructure (green roofs, rain gardens, permeable pavements, etc.); bridge and road repairs; environmental assessments and remediation; sustainable agriculture; protecting fresh water sources and ecosystems; and ecotourism.

Frontline communities such as Detroit, Flint, and Gary would be prioritized and given additional resources. All persons employed by the GLA would make a living wage of $25 an hour, have the option to unionize, receive single-payer federal health insurance, and benefit from educational grants for skills training.

Centering the Great Lakes region — and Michigan and Detroit in particular — is essential to any package of green federal legislation. In so many ways, the ecological and economic “apocalypse” now being discussed as a motivator of a Green New Deal has already happened in the Rust Belt, particularly in post-industrial cities, in abandoned rural locales, and in indigenous communities. No one in America needs a Green New Deal more than than we do, and no one is more willing to fight for it. That’s why for years activists in these communities have been calling for a racially just, green, regenerative, non-extractive, sustainable economy. Their vision should serve as the organizing principle of the Great Lakes Authority and the entire movement for a Green New Deal.

There is much public fascination with the idea that Detroit is now experiencing a “comeback.” But by many metrics (poverty rates, employment statistics, blight rates, etc.), there is no economic recovery happening at all. Most of the investment and “development” in the city has been cosmetic and to the benefit of developers and a handful of millionaire and billionaires. A regional Green New Deal proposal in the form of a Great Lakes Authority would encompass the kind of bold public policy solutions that would deliver a real comeback for Detroit.

Not only is the Great Lakes Authority smart environmentally and economically, it also makes political sense. A proposal to create green manufacturing jobs through the GLA would have broad appeal among displaced blue-collar voters, including those who sat out the 2016 election, or who may have voted for Trump (in part) because of his false promise to bring back manufacturing jobs. As the 2020 presidential cycle approaches, it would behoove all of the candidates vying for battleground states like Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin to sign onto a bold, regionally-targeted jobs proposal such as the Great Lakes Authority.

It’s time to meet the dire crises of the moment with the boldness that is required. This is not rocket science, and we’ve done it before. Let’s harness our nation’s federal resources to restore this great region’s economy and ecology, and turn the Rust Belt Green through a Great Lakes Authority.


Making the Rust Belt Green Through a Federal Great Lakes Authority was originally published in The Detroit Socialist on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

the logo of California DSA

The ARCH Campaign to Cap Rents and Build Public Housing Heats Up

As corporate-aligned media ramp up opposition to Prop 33 in order to preserve the profits of developers as the driver of housing construction, socialists are challenging the market imperative that makes housing a commodity and creates the crisis of the unhoused.

The Affordable Rent-Controlled Housing (ARCH) Campaign to pass Propositions 33 and 5 on the November 5th ballot will put policies in place to address this crisis.

Liz D, a DSA housing activist in Los Angeles, makes clear the connection between rent control and the “housing market”: 

“Only if you accept that housing must be a commodity in the market, that unless private developers can make a return there will be no housing construction, does attacking rent control have any saliency. In fact, housing should not be subject to the market, so Prop 33 is a good opportunity to challenge this assumption and make the case for publicly funded social housing as an alternative to the profit-based housing market.”

Proposition 33

It's important to remember that the inability to afford “market rate” rent is the primary cause of people losing their housing. The state law known as Costa-Hawkins, which Prop 33 would repeal, prevents cities from enacting controls on rent for vacant and new units. Even under the law passed in 2019 by the California Legislature that sets a maximum annual increase on rents of 10%, rents still double within six to ten years for all types of units. 

Thus, our ability to strengthen local rent control and make housing more affordable depends on repealing Costa-Hawkins, which is why tenant rights organizers have so much at stake in winning Prop 33.

Since newly built apartments rent at market rates (except for the non-profit affordable projects and affordable units set-aside for low-income tenants), without strong rent control new construction per se does not create affordable housing.  

It is also true that high interest rates reduce construction, and those high interest rates are driven by high inflation, which is driven in large part by skyrocketing costs of housing. In this sense rent control can help stabilize not only renters but the entire economy including new construction.

Proposition 5

Prop 5 would lower the threshold for voter approval of publicly financed housing, creating more alternatives to for-profit construction.

California DSA chapters are engaged in a variety of tactics to organize support for Props 5 and 33. San Diego DSA is reaching out to voters in neighborhoods most affected by increasing and high rents. Los Angeles DSA has begun canvasses and is coordinating ARCH campaign work with support for LA’s Rent Stabilization Ordinance. 

In addressing why LA DSA housing activists are especially motivated to participate in the ARCH campaign, Mark G provided some context: “63% of Angelenos are renters, and a majority are rent-burdened. Rents have been rising faster than inflation generally, and even rent-controlled units in the city permit a minimum increase of 3% annually. There is no such parallel guaranteed increase in our wages.”

Mark makes the connection between the individual burdens increasing rents create and the social impacts: “This disparity has contributed to overcrowding, displacement, and the housing crisis more generally. Many workers in the city have had to move farther away from the places where they work and spend more of their time commuting to work. This reduces the time that working people have to engage in self-directed activities and is thus expressive of the dynamics of class conflict generally:  rising housing costs make us less free.”

Profit motive—the root of the problem

At the root of this cycle of individual and social harm is the profit-motive. “The further disparity between the increases of rent-controlled housing and market rate housing create an incentive for landlords to harass and evict longer term tenants in pursuit of ever higher profits,” Mark pointed out. “To remedy this, we need vacancy control, which requires the passage of Prop 33, stronger local rent controls, and an organized working class that can secure higher wages to lessen the negative impacts of housing costs.”

North Central Valley DSA started their canvasses and outreach on September 8th. In San Francisco, DSA activists have formed an organizing committee to coordinate with DSA endorsed candidate campaigns; East Bay DSA is doing the same thing.

Matt M, a leader in the ARCH campaign from SF DSA, reports that “both our endorsed Board of Supervisors candidates have endorsed Prop 33 and we're co-mobilizing for it. We're shooting for a big turnout weekend to go along with the statewide weekend of action on October 5th and trying to tie some education about Costa-Hawkins into our tenant organizing work.”

Be a part of the campaign

DSA members in California can be a part of the ARCH Campaign, by filling out this form. And you can join ARCH campaign meetings on Tuesdays at 6:30 pm by registering here

The ARCH campaign state-wide Day of Action is Saturday, October 5th, timed just as state ballots go out! Be sure to sign up on the form so you can help organize an event in your area.

You can also push out messages on social media, and tell your story about high rents, evictions and why you need California to strengthen rent control. Grab some social media images here. And utilize the ARCH Campaign-in-a-Box here

In short: Now is the time to organize statewide to win justice for renters!

the logo of California DSA

Notes on socialist education in the Sacramento Valley

Members of the Sacramento DSA Education Committee with author/activists Hy Thurman and Kwame Shakur.

Like many DSA chapters, our various committees in Sacramento have seen surges and ebbs, depending upon what’s happening in the political life of our community. One initiative that has remained vibrant has been our political education committee. We see political education offering many different contributions and functions in the life of our chapter. 

First, it brings together our membership as a whole to learn, analyze, and discuss various ideas and practices from different aspects of our work as a socialist organization. While DSA can be somewhat splintered along committee lines, including mutual aid, union work and housing, among others, large-scale public events can be helpful to bring comrades together to establish a common understanding and framework for political work overall. These events help to contribute to organizational community-building and a shared social structure.  

Secondly, our political education events are outwardly-facing, and offer good opportunities to bring in members of the public who might not want to join DSA outright, but want an opportunity to attend an event where other members of the public will be present. These events are great opportunities to invite friends, contacts, and acquaintances to a gathering they would feel comfortable attending. 

Thirdly, organizing public events are a great way to build alliances with other movements and to share our common ideas and struggles to build solidarity with like-minded comrades outside the orbit of DSA. 

We have concentrated on two distinct types of events: large public events with speakers, films, performances, book talks and discussions; and our night school, which offers a variety of classes that are more in-depth. 

Feminist author/activist Silvia Federici packed in an audience of two hundred for her presentation organized by the Sacramento DSA Education Committee.

Night Schools

We typically hold our night schools in classrooms in a community center that used to be a school. The location feels like a school, with typical classroom seating with the swiveling arm rests for notetaking. On average these classes have brought in approximately 40 students each. We typically schedule classes in a one-month period, with a class meeting once every week, say on every Thursday of that month. We encourage people to register in advance, and we often distribute a reading ahead of time for each class. 

We have played with the idea of having some kind of “passport” booklet to stamp for every class, and once someone has enough stamps they earn a “diploma” just to make it fun. Some of our classes have included curriculum on racism, imperialism, electoral strategies, queer activism, Marxism, labor strikes and much more. 

Larger public events

Our public events are often geared towards bringing in a larger audience with a more eclectic program than classes. We have had dinners, speakers, films, music, artwork, and a range of educational and cultural offerings. Our evenings have featured Silvia Federici on feminist theory, Hy Thurman and Kwame Shakur on multiracial unity, Debbie Bookchin on the struggle in Rojava, Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz on Native American history, Mat Calahan on the politics of music, Max Elbaum on movement building, Fred Glass on labor history, and Bob Wing on Asian-American activism, among others. 

We try to tie our educational subjects into the work that our committees are doing. For example, we presented labor activist Jane McAlevey (Rest in Power!) with our labor committee at a reading we sponsored at a local bookstore. We worked with our International Committee to co-sponsor a teach-in on Palestine.

During the COVID shutdown we offered online classes such as queer theory, pirate radio, and immigrant rights. Most recently we featured the new film Open Country (produced by two Sacramento DSA members), a radical reinterpretation of North American country music, which opened with a country music performance by DSA members and friends. The money raised from this screening is going toward procuring a grave marker memorial for Aunt Molly Jackson, a singer/songwriter from the Bloody Harlan mine wars who is buried in an unmarked grave in Sacramento.

Community outreach

It’s important to bring in community activists who are not necessarily DSA members, including activists and organizers we feel would benefit our movement as a whole. Billy X Jennings from the “itsabouttime” Black Panther archive spoke about the role of the Black Panther Party and the importance of preserving the people’s archive. We reached out to the broader women’s movement for Silvia Federici’s talk, to strengthen our connections to those working exclusively on sexuality and gender issues. Silvia’s talk drew more than 200 people, which reinforced the importance of reaching out beyond our membership. 

Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz’s talk was co-sponsored by local activists involved in protesting the pipeline projects and also brought in a large, overflow crowd. A new project we have undertaken is to host “international cafes” where we bring activists working in different parts of the world to give updates on current situations in those regions. Our “café” on Central America, for example, highlighted the work of four activists from the region. Almost without exception these events have been standing room only. 

Sacramento DSA Education Committee flyer for Rojava event

The importance of political education

Historically political education has been a central part of organization building. The Communist Party (CPUSA) had many worker schools throughout the country that emphasized political education among the working class. The Black Panther Party relied heavily upon political education to integrate young recruits into the movement. DSA should place a strong priority on political education to strengthen the three aspects we have highlighted so far: education and integration for our members, bringing in interested possible recruits, and strengthening ties with other movement organizations. 

We would like to see our political education initiatives focus on publishing printed materials for our public outreach and tabling work, which we see as very lacking. We would like to propose a shared initiative around printing and distributing this material, which would benefit all of us in every chapter. This would greatly accelerate our efforts to reach the public with inspirational ideas that will fuel a strong socialist movement. Let our motto be: Each One, Teach One!

the logo of California DSA

‘Labor 101 for Socialists’ study group is ready for you

The pamphlet that anchors sessions one and two of the ‘Labor 101 for Socialists’ study group.

Many new DSA members think worker organizing and unions are important, but don’t know much about them and have no experience with them.  Over the last four years, East Bay DSA has created a curriculum, ‘Labor 101 for Socialists’, to introduce new members to the labor movement and the role of socialists in it.  I joined the Labor Education subcommittee in 2022 and facilitated one group. Based on that and on feedback by both participants and facilitators from the previous groups we revised the curriculum, extending it from three sessions to four because important topics got squeezed out when there were only three. I was the facilitator for a group this spring that piloted the new version, and I’m setting up another group for this fall. It has been a great way to bring new members into the Labor Committee and many participants have become active in our labor work.

More a discussion group than a class

Labor 101 for Socialists is more a discussion group than a class.  Participants read some short articles and discuss them based on a series of question prompts; we want them to learn about the labor movement and some fundamental socialist ideas about it, but we also want them to practice talking about those ideas so that they’ll be comfortable talking to co-workers and friends about them and so that they’ll feel more confident about speaking up at Labor Committee or other DSA meetings and educationals. The curriculum was written for new members without labor movement experience, but we’ve also had participants who were in unions but wanted to think about the role of socialists. We welcome friends and contacts who are not DSA members; one participant talked two of her co-workers into attending.

In the first session we talk about what defines the working class, what unions can do, and about why the socialist project depends on organized workers.  The second session focuses on U.S. labor history and includes a brief slideshow about Haymarket and the eight-hour movement, a summary of the 20th century(!) and an article by Eugene Debs about the relationship between socialists and unions.  The unifying text for the first two sessions is a pamphlet written by Fred Glass and published by East Bay DSA, which is also titled Labor 101 for Socialists. The third session looks at class-struggle strategies in unions through two case studies: a chapter from the The Long Deep Grudge by Toni Gilpin about organizing in the South by the left-wing Farm Equipment union in the 30s and 40s, and an article and a video about the history of Teamsters for a Democratic Union.  The last session addresses why socialists play a crucial role in reviving the labor movement and the ways in which participants can get involved in organizing or in union support activities. The week after the last session we plan an informal get-together over beer and pizza at an accessible location.  

Preferred:  the relaxed setting

Group meetings are two hours, with a break in the middle; there are suggested times for each question/topic but we aren’t strict about these; one really good discussion is worth cutting another one a little short. We’ve held the groups both at the EBDSA office and in someone’s living-room; both work, but participants like the more comfortable and relaxed living-room setting. We try to schedule the group for four weeks shortly after our three-session orientation/onboarding group for new chapter members; someone attends the last new-members session to publicize it, along with representatives of other chapter committees and campaigns. 

The group is listed in the chapter calendar. We email previous participants to ask if they know anyone who would be interested, and we announce it at Labor Committee and EBDSA chapter meetings. There is an online form to register for the group; that gives us a phone and email list. Half-page flyers with a QR code to the form are distributed wherever it gets announced.  Some people who sign up never come. Others come but miss one or more sessions. Groups have been as large as twelve and as small as eight. 

The facilitator role

There are two parts to the facilitator role, and they can be done by one person or split between two people.  One part is facilitating the discussion: trying to steer toward the 'key points' noted for each section in the curriculum, inviting people who haven’t spoken to jump in, suggesting that we move on to the next topic.  At the end of each session we go over the reading for the next session, and ask for participants willing to briefly summarize each reading at the start of the next session. 

The other part of facilitating is calling and texting: I try to talk with everyone who signs up before the first session and call or text people who don’t come to the first session to see if they’ll catch up on the reading and come to the second.  If people who came at first miss a session I’ll check in with them  during the week.  With a group of ten these calls require some attention but not a lot of time.  After the last session where we go over ways they can be involved.  I check in with participants to make sure that they are connected to some piece of labor work.

It’s great if one of the facilitators has some union experience but not required.  We have tried to make the curriculum stand on its own. There are readings, discussion questions and timing for each session. Questions the facilitator can’t answer (I’ve been stumped several times) can become a quick research project for the questioner or the facilitator for the next meeting. 

Great results

Building relationships and political capacity through Labor 101 has had great results for us. Several of the non-DSA participants have joined EBDSA. Some of the participants in the first group I facilitated in 2023 have become leaders of the Labor Committee. Three of the participants in the second group became involved in organizing their workplace.  Two have joined a chapter Tech Workers Circle. One is part of an organizing committee that has now submitted a super-majority of cards for union recognition. She says that salting might be her next career goal. Many new DSA members think worker organizing and unions are important—and Labor 101 for Socialists has been a way to move them to activity and organizing.

Our curriculum is available HERE; our last revision was also a chance to make it something that others could use.  If you are interested in trying it in your chapter, please let us know how we can help. If you try it or if you are already doing similar things we’d like to know.

the logo of California DSA

Why the U.S. celebrates Labor Day about four months late

Illustration by Jos Sances. In 1889 the Socialist Second International called for commemorating the martyrdom of the immigrant worker leaders of the eight-hour day struggle with a May Day holiday. 

[This article originally appeared on Labor Day in the San Francisco Chronicle, but it’s behind a paywall. Enjoy it for free in California Red.]

It was supposed to be May Day.

The May Day holiday—International Workers Day—is currently celebrated by over one hundred countries across the earth. Only in the United States and Canada is a similar holiday—Labor Day—held in September.

This is ironic, because the events inspiring the birth of May Day occurred here. 

Most people have a vague understanding of the problems faced by the working class in the nineteenth century, before passage of any meaningful laws regulating the workday or limiting the ability of capital to control the lives of workers. But the realities were often far worse than we might imagine today.  


Bloody harvest

Ten, twelve and even fourteen-hour workdays, six or sometimes seven days a week, were the norm in many industries. Factories were filled with machines tended by workers. Moving parts were exposed, and employers considered protections like guardrails too expensive to install. No laws required such measures, and no penalties came with worker casualties. In those regulation-free workplaces, each year brought a bloody harvest of worker injuries and deaths, with most occurring in the final hours of the long workday as workers grew tired and careless.

Which is why, beginning in the 1860s, shortly after the conclusion of the Civil War, arose a movement for a standard eight-hour workday. As the slogan of the time had it, workers wanted “Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest, eight hours for what we will.”

In California, the second state law in the country (following Illinois) established the eight-hour day in 1867. But without any enforcement mechanisms, it proved meaningless when the newly completed transcontinental railroad carried unemployed workers by the thousands seeking jobs across the country to the Golden State a few years later. The glut of labor reduced wages and lengthened the workday. 

The arrogance felt by employers toward their employees at the time was exemplified by statements like that of George Baer, owner of the Reading Railroad, who promised that “The rights of the laboring man will be protected, and cared for, not by the labor agitator but by the Christian men to whom God has given control of the property interests in this country.”

General strike for the eight hour day

Workers and their unions saw things differently. In 1886 the American Federation of Labor asked its member unions to call a general strike on May first to support the campaign for the eight-hour day. 

A third of a million workers answered the call and walked off the job, hoping to achieve the limit with their action. 

But in the wake of the strike, in Chicago, a demonstration protesting police violence against strikers was disrupted by a bomb in Haymarket Square. Although no one was ever identified as the bomb thrower, a lynch mob atmosphere, whipped up by anti-union employers, put eight immigrant radical worker leaders on trial, and several were hung. The prosecution admitted that no evidence connected these leaders with the bomb, but wanted to make an example of them. The nation’s first Red Scare, predating McCarthyism by some six decades, took hold. Advocacy for workers was equated with anarchism and communism. Eight hours for work had to wait for another day.

In Europe, the Socialist International in 1889, condemning the martyrdom of the eight-hour day leaders in Chicago, proposed commemorating their cause with a workers’ holiday on May 1. 

A few years later, following massive labor-capital battles like the Homestead Steel Strike in 1892, in the midst of the Pullman strike in summer 1894, in which workers were killed by police, the national guard and armed thugs employed by the railroads, President Grover Cleveland thought a little steam might be let out of the pressure cooker of class struggle. He put his pen to a bill proclaiming that henceforth, the first Monday in September would be a holiday celebrating the contributions of workers to America. This bill made no mention of the eight-hour day or the repression of the workers’ movement. Under these circumstances Labor Day was, in effect, an employer-friendly substitute for May Day.

Elsewhere, in country after country, mass worker movements pushed their governments to sign May 1 into law as a paid workers’ holiday, in many cases via the same general strike tactic.

Fifty more years 

It took fifty years before the eight-hour day became the law of the land here, when FDR signed the Fair Labor Standards Act in 1938, in the wake of the largest upsurge of worker militancy since the nineteenth century. But May Day never even came close. 

The history of May Day was not taught in our schools. Its public memory was suppressed by selective association with Communist countries that celebrated it, ignoring both its American origins and the democracies that observed it as well. During the Cold War, seeking to drive a final stake through the coffin of May Day memory, Dwight D. Eisenhower proclaimed May 1 to be “Law Day”.

In recent years, May Day—like the labor movement itself—has been making something of a comeback. Here in the Bay Area central labor councils have jointly called May 1 marches and demonstrations—something unthinkable during the long years of the Cold War.

As we celebrate Labor Day, by all means, let’s go get the deals at “big Labor Day savings” sales, and grill hot dogs or meatless substitutes over our backyard BBQs. Take the day off work. We all deserve it. But also take a moment to recall that Labor Day was the original meatless substitute. 

And come May 1 next year, look around for and help organize the nearest demonstration. 

the logo of California DSA

“Not another bomb” rally in Los Angeles

DSA LA was a coalition partner in an “uncommitted” rally to pressure the Democratic National Convention around Palestine. (Rob Knaak, photo)

Last month, on the Sunday before the Democratic National Convention took place, the Uncommitted movement called for widespread actions and rallies to be organized as a show of pro-Palestine power demanding “Not Another Bomb” fall on Gaza. The leadership of Uncommitted put out the call to action and shortly thereafter nearly one hundred actions were organized all across the country in more than thirty-five states. Pro-Palestine protests took the streets from Fairbanks, Alaska to New York City. Some of them were small rallies or speak-outs; some were large-scale marches. The events were organized on the eve of the DNC to call out the Democratic Party’s complicity in the genocide in Gaza and to demand change. 

Numerous organizations participated in L.A.

In Los Angeles, DSA LA organizers teamed up with organizers from IfNotNow Los Angeles, the Committee of Interns and Residents / Service Employees International Union (CIR-SEIU), Transport Workers Union Local 320, IATSE Members for Palestine, United Auto Workers-UC Local 4811, SAG-AFTRA for Ceasefire, and Yalla Indivisible to organize a rally on the steps of City Hall. The rally convened on a Sunday morning and drew almost three hundred attendees. Speakers from numerous organizations stood up and spoke urgently about the need for an immediate and permanent ceasefire and an arms embargo. Sikhs of Los Angeles showed up and brought free vegan food for everyone who attended the protest, and we ended the rally with chants, songs, and solidarity. 

Why was it important for DSA-LA to be involved in this action? We are part of a national organization that has political power when we act with unity from city to city. DSA members were involved at all levels of this campaign push and took action across the country leading up to and throughout the DNC week. Not only that, but this action brought in newer DSA leaders who helped marshal the event, coordinate event logistics, and do outreach to coalition organizations. We wanted to flex that power to demand a free Palestine, so we joined Palestinian leaders in the Uncommitted movement to demand an end to the genocide and an arms embargo. We cannot just pressure the Democratic Party from within via convention delegates and primary challenges; we need a clear inside-outside strategy that leverages the power of mass political protest and organized labor to transform society. 

Labor and the Left

As socialists, we know that only the organized working class has the power to affect real change in society. All of our political work needs to be intertwined within the power of the labor movement. So we worked hard to pull organizations together from both Left political spaces and the labor movement for this action, to demonstrate that the power of organized labor is behind the demand for a free Palestine. 

Many DSA LA members are rank-and-file members of the Los Angeles labor movement, which ensured we were well positioned to bring in organized labor in this action. This is especially important since last month, when seven major labor unions (including UAW and SEIU) signed a letter to Kamala Harris demanding an embargo of arms shipments to Israel. That letter was a historic moment in the fight for an end to the occupation, one of the most significant political signals in decades. This gathered international support with major unions from France to Brazil signing on to the letter. We have power in the labor movement for a free Palestine, and we must continue to cohere, consolidate, and build from that vantage point.

the logo of California DSA

Burbank City Council races powered by DSA

Canvassers prepare to knock doors for Burbank city council candidates endorsed by DSA-LA

DSA-LA has officially endorsed current City Councilmember Konstantine Anthony as well as newcomer Mike Van Gorder for the two open Burbank City Council seats for the 2024 general election in November. Comrades across the San Fernando Valley (SFV), the northwestern portion of the DSA-LA chapter, are starting up the campaign to get these two fine socialists elected—strategizing and mobilizing so we can hit the ground running.

At the top of Burbankers’ minds is the high cost of housing, especially for the city’s 58% renter majority at the mercy of the state’s 10% rent cap, lack of universal just cause, and minimal protections against no-fault evictions. Councilmember Anthony has spent the past four years pushing forward despite loud out-of-town landlords and city staff reluctant to bring real tenant protections and rent stabilization to Burbank in the form of a robust ordinance. Van Gorder currently works as a housing policy analyst for the state of California and is a former tenant organizer. Having Van Gorder on our council, along with Burbank Tenants Union co-founder Anthony, will send a strong message about the need for affordable housing and strong tenant protections.

Candidates of and for the working class

Also on the minds of Burbank residents are continued protections and inclusion of its vibrant LGBTQ community, continued efforts toward gun control, and making our streets safer and more accessible for all. Anthony and Van Gorder both have children in Burbank’s public school system and are members of labor unions, so we are pleased to have these working class champions who stand shoulder to shoulder with striking workers and proudly participate in events celebrating Burbank’s queer and drag communities fighting to represent us on Council.

As the working group gears up, DSA-LA members and allies across the SFV are energized and ready to hit the ground running to make phone calls and knock on doors. With some conservative opponents already raising big money from corporate and real estate interests, we’re excited to show that their money is no match for DSA’s people-powered campaigns. With Anthony and Van Gorder running in Burbank, and Jillian Burgos running for Los Angeles City Council’s 2nd District located in the SFV as well, we are thrilled at the potential for socialist power to expand greatly in this previously untapped area. LA City look out! Burbank could be this region’s newest red hot socialist epicenter!

the logo of California DSA

Jillian Burgos for City Council District 2

Jillian Burgos (center) is running for City Council with the support of DSA LA

DSA-LA is proud to announce our endorsement of CD-2 City Council candidate Jillian Burgos. Jillian is a bold leader and proud socialist whose dedication to co-creating a thriving San Fernando Valley for all is infectious. If elected, Jillian will be the first Afro-Latina in history to serve on LA City Council, and if joined by fellow DSA-endorsed candidate Ysabel Jurado (CD-14), she will be one of five socialists to hold seats on the council. Yet for DSA-LA and Jillian alike, this campaign isn’t just about winning an election. It’s about the journey—connecting our community in meaningful ways, amplifying the voices of the working class, and developing strong leaders who will continue to fight for a socialist government long after November 5th.

Jillian is an artist, an essential healthcare worker, and a leader on housing and homelessness issues. She currently serves on North Hollywood Neighborhood Council as Chair of the Housing and Services Committee, where she partnered with The City of Los Angeles, SAJE, and Abundant Housing LA to create a Tenants Rights and a Housing Crisis Workshop; she’s helped to secure several Neighborhood Access Grants that provide food and services to our unhoused neighbors, as well as mental health care and mentorship for school children. A true grassroots candidate, Jillian has worked closely with LA Forward as an outspoken advocate for unarmed crisis response, picketed with WGA, SAG, and IATSE, and stood up for LGBTQIA+ children and families at Saticoy Elementary

Powerful position

With just 15 City Council members to represent roughly 3.8 million constituents, Los Angeles City Council is among the most powerful elected positions in the nation, and its electoral races are among the most cutthroat. In Los Angeles, even “progressive” candidates like Jillian’s opponent Adrin Nazarian are often backed by corporate interests, police unions, fossil fuel giants, and landlords. For Jillian Burgos, a people-powered woman of color, it’s no secret that this system is stacked against her, but she doesn’t back down from a challenge. Instead, Jillian shook the political establishment to its core in the March Primary, running her hope-centered campaign on small-dollar donations and active support from her community. Against all odds, she garnered nearly 8,500 votes, securing her place in the General election by a significant margin. 

Jillian helped us launch our first canvass out of NoHo Park on August 11th, and in the weeks since, we’ve braved the Valley heat to knock doors and talk to our neighbors on a weekly basis. In September, DSA-LA’s San Fernando Valley Branch officially stepped out of Hot Socialist Summer and into our GOTV era, and we’re taking it up a notch. DSA for Jillian is committed to developing our Valley comrades into capable and confident organizers, nourishing our roots by giving branch members opportunities to lead, and the support they need to pull them off. 

For example, working group member P.M. Aréchiga has spearheaded outreach for bilingual canvassers both within DSA-LA and in the broader community. “CD-2 is made up of approximately seven neighborhoods, with four of those having a Latine population at or above 50%. I’ve lived in CD-2 for eleven years and it’s abundantly clear that gentrification has made its way over the hill and into the Valley. I’m confident that once in office, Jillian will work to make sure that families who’ve lived in the Valley for generations will not be displaced in the name of ‘progress’ and will fight to make sure community is preserved,” the longtime Valley Glen resident affirmed at a recent working group meeting. 

Deepening the connections 

One of the most exciting parts about our endorsement is deepening the connection between Jillian and DSA-LA, through collaboration with our priority campaigns. We’ve been able to facilitate valuable conversations between Jillian and her campaign team, and working group co-chairs. Between now and November 5th, we’ll host joint canvasses with Power to the Tenants, Power Mass Transit, Palestine Solidarity and Hollywood Labor. Creating pathways of communication and supporting Jillian’s campaign with passionate volunteers sets the tone for the DSA-SiO relationship to come. “Jillian's candidacy is an opportunity to re-engage our membership in the Valley, and once we win, we hope that it will continue to engage our membership civically since we will have a socialist voice representing us in council,” explains Lorena, our SFV Branch Socialists in Office Liaison. 

“Historically, the Valley is a part of the city that has been an afterthought for progressive groups, thereby ceding a huge part of the city to the interests of landowners and corporations,” said David Abud, co-chair of the Jillian Working Group. “With Jillian, we are building a progressive coalition that can expand our working class power bloc into this crucial part of the city. Now is the time for us to invest resources, pound the pavement and knock doors to make this vision a reality,” he stated. In addition to canvassing, DSA-LA is activating lapsed members and bringing new members in with fun socials and fundraisers like weekly post-carding on Wednesdays at Lawless Brewery in North Hollywood, a post-phonebanking pool party at Hansen Dam Aquatic Center in the Northeast SFV, and an upcoming Lotería fundraiser hosted in Valley Glen. Locals, now is the time to join us in support of Jillian Burgos for CD-2, because when we fight–WE WIN!

Visit https://www.jillianforthevalley.com/ to find out more about Jillian Burgos.

Click here to get involved. 

Click here to donate

With love from the Valley,

DSA-LA for Jillian

the logo of California DSA

Social housing in Vienna

We could learn a few things from the history of social housing in Red Vienna

With all the recent talk from the Harris campaign about subsidizing first-time home buyers, we might want to be looking at an additional approach:  build social housing.

For the second time within a year, I spent four days with a Hungarian couple, two teenage daughters, three guinea pigs and a Spitz. All within a seventy square meter two-bedroom, one of many in a complex. 

Built in 1929 as workers' quarters, its small single worker apartments have been recombined into livable and affordable spaces. The balcony of their third-floor apartment looks out on a shared park area with trees, walkways and a small greenhouse. The eight buildings that formed the quadrangle on their block are a mix of public and private. You need to live in Vienna two years, and then you can go on a waiting list for housing. The income of the people I stayed with qualifies them for a rent of 770 Euros per month (about $850). 

This is where I stayed (John Marienthal, photo)

In the building bulletin board we see the police help poster "I am here for you", a firefighter poster, and the photo in the middle shows who is in charge of your building. There is one maintenance company for the 200,000 apartments the city owns. Because the city also subsidized other construction, about 60% of Viennese people live in some form of social housing. 

To get a mix of all incomes the upper limit for these apartments is €65,000. For a fuller discussion of Vienna's housing please follow the link to the article “The Social Housing Secret” in Portside