DSA’s city council victories draw out true face of ‘progressive’ corporate agenda.

Written by Brian D.

In a recent interview in the Rose City Reform Podcast, two reporters were asked about the Democratic Socialists of America, and the significance of three DSA members on a newly elected Portland City Council. The host quoted this Instagram message from Portland DSA after DSA candidates won their election:

“The socialist movement is in City Hall. CEOs, developers, landlords, union-busters, billionaires and their puppets are now on notice…”

Neither reporter spoke of the landlords, developers, billionaires, CEOs, or union-busters in their response; nor are they discussed much at all in describing local political stories. In describing “special interest groups” having influence in City Hall, the capitalist media often omits the key players who are also their advertisers, bankrollers, corporate partners.

The interview demonstrated three clear points. First: reporters can struggle to report issues centered in class, and centered in the power of ordinary people. Secondly, local media feeds into false narratives about the political spectrum in Portland, just like the media does in other “progressive” cities, like San Francisco, and at the national level. And third, reporters and their corporate media outlets have clear political agendas, even when they pretend otherwise.

Reporters struggle to parse socialists because solidarity is an alien concept under capitalism, and class as a concept is stripped from public discourse in America. Socialism and the power of regular people to come together confuses reporters also because the media industry is actually the media and entertainment industry, worth about $570 billion in the United States. The profit incentives under capitalism define how our media functions- as entertainment or an algorithm designed to stimulate outrage and clicks on your device- and what is allowed to be a story. Under capitalism the incentive is to pretend that exploitation in society has nothing to do with class, nothing to do with being intentionally divided and conquered so that the passive incomes of the wealthy shall not be disturbed.

There is irony here; from camera operators and photographers, to journalists, reporters, and copy editors- the actual workers in the media industry have been devastated by the capitalist pressures of financialization and the gutting of news rooms.

Socialized health care, free or low-cost secondary education, paid family leave, effective and safe free public transit, robust infrastructure, social housing, and much lower rates of child poverty are conditions the majority of countries choose when given the opportunity, and much more the norm across the world. They are possible here- but one would not know it from any capitalist media in Oregon.

“When I give food to the poor, they call me a saint. When I ask why the poor have no food, they call me a communist.” ― Dom Helder Camara

Many of the reporters interviewed on Rose City Reform, and in the Portland City Cast, consistently describe Portland politics as a spectrum: from “moderate,” to “progressive,” to “far left”. This is false, and pretends that there is not a right wing. By omission or downplaying, reporters maintain the pretense that powerful interests aren’t right wing, and pit “moderates,” and “progressives”, against a “far left,” purposefully obscuring the field and players.

The Portland Metro Chamber bankrolled their servant Sam Adams for Multnomah County Commissioner; but local reporters never describe Sam Adams as right wing; despite his clear agenda and masters. Portland Metro Chamber and the powerful developer and real estate lobby are rarely identified as critical players in local politics; the local media obscures reality. This is an example of the political agenda behind the local capitalist publications and their editorial biases.

Developers are the fourth branch of City Hall, but reporters are busy framing the fights between the “far left”, and “progressives” who just aren’t realists like those moderates. The powerful class interests in operation are whistled away; nothing to see. Wealthy developers threaten to sue the city when they don’t like the policies or reforms presented, guaranteeing a lose-lose scenario as the issue crawls through the courts for years. Too often, the city attorney lays out how it is in the cities’ best interest to capitulate. Reporting on this is not robust; instead the framing is how unions and DSA have more power in City Hall relative to the past.

In San Francisco, wealthy property owners coalesced to express how they want to make their city better; using the language of progressivism to make their case, and framing the discussion as if there was no right wing politics in San Francisco, no politics of class. That public relations campaign, led by local wealthy business interests, quickly pivoted to criticizing politicians and a campaign to remove the progressive District Attorney, who was falsely made the scapegoat for the homeless crisis and the crime spike during the pandemic.

Portland follows the same trend. People for Portland, a front group for wealthy business interests, coalesced to express how they want to make the city better for everyone, using the language of progressivism to make that case. That public relations campaign quickly pivoted to criticizing politicians and a campaign to remove the progressive District Attorney, who they made the scapegoat for the homeless crisis and fentanyl drug use. People for Portland violated Oregon election law in 2022, and disbanded in 2024, after the attention on the group made it clear they were no longer an effective front for the business interests and wealthy.

Pretending that politics here is just moderates, progressives, and the far left gives cover to the moves of the powerful in Portland and Oregon, and leaves journalists in a blind spot. Phil Knight funded the Republican Party of Oregon outright not that many years ago; Columbia Sportswear CEO Tim Boyle helped fund People for Portland. The previous City Council established numerous “Enterprise Zones” that also come with massive tax incentives that pauperize the City in the years to come. Clear analysis of the massive transfer of wealth out of the hands of the working class and permanently into the accounts of the owning class is required to address the real struggles of Portlanders and Oregonians, not false narratives that omit the key players.

Pretending that the class, corporate, and Right-wing interests who have influenced, profited from, and largely controlled Oregon for decades aren’t factors then makes it hard to address homelessness, quality of life issues, and the need for public goods and services. When you can’t analyze the causes for your current crisis, you fail to address the issue and fail to lastingly improve conditions.

Willamette Week for example, has a massive and obvious editorial bias: Oregon and Portland taxes are too high, Portland spends too much, is the subtext, if not the main text, of every third article produced. Divide and conquer narratives straight from the comfortable and wealthy. Here’s a stellar example of what might have been written by Portland Metro Chamber staff:

From the article:

“High taxes are hurting job growth in Portland and chasing wealthy people out of town. Despite those aggressive levies, many government services are poor, in part because specialized taxes aimed at girding for climate change, getting kids into preschool, and helping the homeless have, at various times, gone unspent. In June 2024, the unspent hoard totaled $1.26 billion.”

The tactic on display in the article quoted above: these identified funds are to compete against each other to see who can fend off cuts, while “moderates” demand that progressives and the left divide the baby.

Because what is required, according to the wealthy and powerful, is austerity for working class people and socialized risk for the wealthy, just like in the last Gilded Age, and the beginning of the Great Depression. By their lights it only makes sense to take from homeless funds, preschool funds, funds to address climate change, or all three.

Willamette Week quotes extensively from reports from business interests assessing Oregon and Portland as having too high taxes and wealthy fleeing the state; no opposition to this was interviewed nor quoted, despite the fact that this argument is trotted out over and over and usually debunked as skewed and inaccurate. The peoples of Oregon deserve better- better reporting for sure; but more crucially, better quality of life generally, struggling under huge rent, utility, and grocery cost increases, without the wages to match.

The Oregonian unsurprisingly has decades more experience burying the lead, for example regarding Zenith Oil in Portland. The opposition to Zenith is framed as ‘activists’- not entire neighborhoods of working people and families living in a liquefaction zone next to massive oil storage tanks- who see Big Oil in Portland has no plan when the big earthquake comes, except maybe mass funerals.

Austerity will ill prepare this generation, and the next to contribute, support, and be supported within a community. Austerity means instead of services to keep families in housing, they are unhoused. Austerity means instead of a tree canopy, you get more heat deaths in East Portland. Austerity means instead of access to education you get crowded, underserved classrooms. Austerity means less investment in infrastructure that makes Portland livable and functional.

The interests of the wealthy are not the interests of the working class. It’s time to cut through the false media and right-wing narratives, and time to stop pretending. Let’s invest in the working families, the working peoples of Oregon and Portland. Let’s talk about a jobs program and a social housing program, not how regular folk must make due with less. Workers really do deserve more!

The post The Politics of Pretending in Progressive Portland appeared first on Portland DSA.

In moments of historical consequence, everyday people can rise as a chorus that shakes the foundations of power–or be intimidated into silence. Today, we stand at such a crossroads. The pillars of democracy tremble not from natural disaster but from calculated erosion. This is not politics as usual but the dimming of lights that have guided our journey toward justice.

When power concentrates in fewer hands, when dissent becomes dangerous, when truth bends to serve the powerful—these warning signs demand our attention. Democracy dies in silence, withering through a thousand small concessions, each seemingly reasonable alone, catastrophic together.

The Democratic Socialists of America represent a vision where power rests with the many, not the few. In this critical moment, this vision becomes necessary. We offer a framework for resistance that is both principled and practical, understanding that true freedom requires both political rights and material security.

Participating in resistance means recognizing democracy is not a spectator sport. Voting is just the beginning of our civic responsibility. True democratic participation happens in community meetings, mutual aid networks, labor organizing, public demonstrations, and countless daily acts of solidarity. Democracy is a thing that becomes real when we engage in it.

When we join DSA chapters, we declare our commitment to a democracy that works for all. We assert that healthcare, housing, education, and dignified work are not commodities to be rationed by the wealthy but human rights to be guaranteed by society. These rights are not privileges to be granted or withheld at the whims of parasitic wealth extractors and bloodless billionaires.

Collective action transforms fear into courage. Alone, we feel overwhelmed by state and corporate power. Together, we know that no system of control can withstand the sustained resistance of ordinary people determined to live in dignity.

The path forward requires courage to stand firm when intimidated, to speak truth when lies become policy, to protect the vulnerable when targeted. It requires care to build relationships across differences and create spaces where democracy is practiced.

In joining DSA, you become part of a living tradition stretching from abolitionists to suffragists, from labor movements to civil rights struggles, from environmental justice to queer liberation.

The question isn’t whether history will judge our actions—it already is. The question is whether we’ll tell our children that when democracy was in peril, we did more than watch. That we stood with our neighbors. That we chose solidarity over cynicism. That we helped bend history toward justice.

The time for that choice is now. Join us.

The chaos induced by Musk and friends is already causing mass outrage. Millions of ordinary people affected can become allies of workers and unions. Here's how to join the fight.

The post How Federal Workers Can Organize for Defense Against DOGE appeared first on EWOC.

Depending on where you work, you may be covered by the NLRA or other federal or state laws. See what covers you and how to use it.

The post Am I covered by the NLRA? appeared first on EWOC.

Every year the chapter conducts a census of the members and creates a report on how the dynamics of the chapter function along with vital information about demographics. Read the report here.

The post 2024 CNJ DSA Chapter Census appeared first on Central NJ DSA.

By Henry McKeand

In the everchanging movie landscape of the past decade, one of the great casualties has been the wide-release R-rated comedy. In the 2000s, raunchy joke-a-minute projects were being made with big stars for less than $50 million and reliably turning a profit at the box office, but there was a shift in the industry around a decade ago. Suddenly, studios were afraid to take a risk on releases that didn’t have superhero spectacle or franchise potential, and mid-budget films began to face an uphill battle at the cineplex. Comedy moved to television and the internet, while lighthearted fare in movies was relegated mostly to direct-to-streaming leftovers and throwaway gags in larger blockbusters.

This is part of what makes One of Them Days, Lawrence Lamont’s new comedy starring Keke Palmer and SZA as friends on a Los Angeles odyssey to recover their rent money, such a breath of fresh air. It’s a capital-C comedy with a back-to-basics buddy dynamic and modest budget (around $14 million), relying on a funny trailer and the strength of its stars to drive audiences to the theater. There’s an old-school appeal here that has already made it successful with critics and audiences, but the real highlight is the working class core of the narrative. When was the last time you watched a crowd-pleaser where the main dramatic question was whether or not the main characters would be evicted?

Palmer plays Dreux, an ambitious young woman working as a waitress at a small diner who has an important corporate interview coming up in the afternoon. SZA plays Alyssa, a talented artist with a laid back demeanor and “candles and crystals” sensibility. While Dreux has a plan for everything, Alyssa goes with the flow and believes that the spirits of their ancestors will guide them through anything life has in store. But when Alyssa’s do-nothing boyfriend Keshawn runs off with their rent money, they’re forced to work as a team and race against the clock to get their money back before their landlord kicks them out, contending with various local oddballs, criminals, and love interests along the way. 

The ticking clock, escalating insanity, and “best friends” bickering call to mind countless comedies from yesteryear, from House Party to Superbad, but the best reference point may be the original Friday. Syreeta Singleton’s script shares not only a working class LA milieu with the F. Gary Gray and Ice Cube classic, but also a similar blend of social realism and class clown silliness. The best Black comedies of the 90s and 2000s, such as Friday and The Wood, served as more socially conscious alternatives to their “white yuppie in crisis” peers, and One of Them Days is no different. Whereas the few big-budget comedies of the past ten years have either been absurdist romps disconnected from reality (Bottoms, Barb and Star go to Vista Del Mar) or Hangover-esque tales of well-off middle class characters cutting loose (Booksmart, Ricky Stanicky), Lamont and Singleton focus on the daily problems that Black and working class people face. 

More so than the gangsters and bullies who stand in Dreux and Alyssa’s way (here, Friday’s Deebo is swapped out for a take-no-shit neighborhood woman nicknamed “Big Booty Berniece”), the true villain is the capitalist, white supremacist world that they live in. Their ceiling is falling apart, but their landlord hasn’t fixed it. When they get their first white neighbor (Euphoria’s Maude Apatow) as a result of ongoing gentrification, they’re shocked that her unit has a working AC. In order to whip up some quick money, their only obvious options are trying to donate at a blood bank and applying for predatory loans. And when they end up en route to the hospital after one of them is electrocuted, they decide to escape from the ambulance because they can’t afford the medical bill.

Things aren’t all bleak, though. This is a film that understands the power of friendship and solidarity in the face of oppressive systems. The various neighbors argue and isolate themselves just like everyday people, but they also come together and stand up for one another as tenants and members of a shared community. And while Dreux and Alyssa have their differences, the script never forces conflict between them. For all of her flakiness, Alyssa is refreshingly supportive in her support for Dreux, and SZA, in her first major acting role, captures the character’s eccentricities and contradictions remarkably well. Palmer, too, is predictably great; her movie star charisma has been evident for years, and she is routinely hilarious as Dreux. Together, they create a lived-in quality to their characters’ friendship that’s authentic and warm.

It doesn’t hurt that this is the funniest feature-length script in years, never afraid to balance sweet human touches with comedic big swings. One scene, involving the blood bank and Abbott Elementary’s Janelle James as an irresponsible nurse, is one of the most laugh-out-loud things to grace the big screen in a long time. There’s also no shortage of perfect cameos, including Lil Rel Howery as a sneaker obsessive and Katt Williams as a sidewalk truth teller named Lucky. But the biggest standouts are the lesser-known names, such as Patrick Cage as Dreux’s mysterious crush and Joshua Neal as Keshawn. Neal, especially, embodies an all-too-real kind of unambitious, manipulative boyfriend with hilarious conviction.

Movies like One of Them Days are often classified by Hollywood as “minor” or “low stakes.” There’s no high-concept twist or massive energy beam threatening to destroy the world. These kinds of “low stakes” movies, however, are the ones that capture the actual joys and stresses of modern life. Take, for example, the scene where Dreux has her interview and has to prove herself to a white hiring manager who doesn’t know how to pronounce her name. The sequence is overflowing with emotion and humor and suspense, and it’s all rooted in something “mundane.” 

At one point, as Dreux is talking to a neighbor who has been evicted and is worried about where he’ll go next, she says four simple words: “Your life is lifing.” It’s an acknowledgement that day-to-day existence is far too urgent and scary for the majority of us. One of Them Days isn’t a radical film, or at least it shouldn’t be. It’s not a vitriolic call to action or an openly socialist film. But by honing in on these kinds of mundane, material realities, it stands out from the endless stream of studio releases that are completely disconnected from working class concerns. 

Films are powerful in their ability to reflect and influence public opinion, and the success of One of Them Days points to a growing dissatisfaction with capitalism. The contradictions and stresses in our everyday lives have gotten to a point where audiences are ready for stories that take stands landlords and the healthcare system. Slowly but surely, the needle is moving.

If your life is lifing right now, and you want to fight for a world in which people don’t have to struggle in order to have simple necessities, then the time is now to get involved with groups like Triangle DSA and Triangle Tenant Union!

Welcome to another Town Meeting Day.

Last year, Champlain Valley DSA’s Burlington-focused voter guide lamented the brevity of the Queen City’s ballot following Democratic city councilors’ unusual refusal to allow voters to consider a citizens’ initiative condemning Israeli apartheid, even though more than 1,700 residents had signed the organizers’ petition. And now, the same thing has happened again.

One question, six towns (or more)

This time around, however, activists didn’t limit their efforts to Burlington. The Apartheid-Free Community pledge – drafted originally by the American Friends Service Committee – will appear on ballots in Winooski, Vergennes, Montpelier, Brattleboro, Newfane, and Thetford. Hearteningly, as it turns out, the Burlington Democrats’ contempt for democracy may be unique within Vermont; across the state, other city councils and select boards have determined to let the people have their say.

Coincidentally, Champlain Valley DSA no longer exists: Green Mountain DSA – a new chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America seeking to represent all of Vermont (or, at least, all but the sliver belonging to our Windsor County comrades in Upper Valley DSA) – has replaced it. On our first Town Meeting Day, we endorse the Apartheid-Free Community pledge in every municipality whose ballot contains it.

The text is the same in all six places. Vote yes on Article 5 in Winooski, Article 7 in Vergennes, Article 13 in Montpelier, Article 2 in Brattleboro, Article 38 in Newfane, and Article 23 in Thetford. Please tell your friends, or you can send them this video or this op-ed written by GMDSA’s co-chair for the Times-Argus.

On behalf of the Shelburne Progressive Town Committee, a member of Green Mountain DSA also plans to propose the Apartheid-Free Community pledge from the floor at Shelburne’s Town Meeting Day, along with a resolution advocating for healthcare reform. GMDSA endorses this effort as well. If you’re planning to attend an in-person town meeting where you live, consider doing the same thing!

Winooski

Due to a procedural error last time around, Winooski must vote again on its Just Cause Eviction charter change, which passed by a huge margin in 2023. You can learn more about Just Cause Eviction, a policy that protects renters, here.

Municipal charter changes must travel through the statehouse. Burlington, Essex, and Montpelier passed Just Cause Eviction in 2021, 2023, and 2024, respectively, but none of them has won permission to implement it. And with the Vermont General Assembly trending rightward, its immediate prospects don’t look good.

But tenants will keep fighting, and someday the tenants will win. GMDSA endorses Just Cause Eviction. Vote yes on Article 4 in Winooski.

Randolph

The Orange County town of Randolph has 4,774 residents. At that size, one might expect it not to have a police force. Jericho, Georgia, and Waterbury are all larger than Randolph, and none of them employ police officers.

Yet Randolph does have its own police department, and that police department has requested a budget of $820,937 for fiscal year 2026. Including generous supplements from the town’s American Rescue Plan Act allocation, spending has grown rapidly since fiscal year 2022, when the town paid just $343,960 for law enforcement services.

The Randolph Police Department serves the Randolph Police District, not the entire municipality. The residents of the Police District, specifically, must therefore approve or reject the police budget as an independent article rather than as a component of the townwide vote on Randolph’s annual general fund expenditure. As a result, they have a chance to say no to this particular form of municipal spending without saying no to the rest.

Like many other parts of Vermont, Randolph appears recently to have begun moving toward austerity. The Orange Southwest School District has proposed cutting $1.1 million from its new budget in order to avoid property tax increases in Randolph, Brookfield, and Braintree. Yet the Randolph Police Department has bet that the growing cheapskate attitude that has emerged out of Vermont’s cost-of-living problem will make an exception for expensive policing.

We hope they’re wrong. GMDSA endorses a “no” vote on Article 5 in Randolph. It won’t abolish the police, but it’ll send Randolph’s bloated cop budget back to the drawing board.

Candidates

The membership of Green Mountain DSA did not vote to endorse any candidates for public office on Town Meeting Day this year. But our Electoral Working Group recommends the 17-candidate slate endorsed by the Vermont Progressive Party.

We’re especially pleased to see Progressives in Windham, Lamoille, and Addison counties running for select board and school board positions. In Burlington, East District and South District candidates Kathy Olwell and Jennifer Monroe Zakaras both face competition for open seats.

Victories in those races would give Progressives a majority on the Burlington City Council. Burlington’s ballot also includes a critical vote on a $152 million bond for improved wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, upon which plans for new housing depend – we recommend a yes on Question 3.

School budgets

Taking a hint from the stronger-than-usual showing for Vermont Republicans in November’s legislative elections, school districts have aimed to head off an anticipated taxpayer revolt on Town Meeting Day by slashing their budgets preemptively. Hundreds of school employees will lose their jobs, but that may not be enough to satisfy voters in some towns.

In 2024, Vermonters shot down about a third of the school budgets across the state, forcing cuts that hurt students, teachers, and families alike. This year, we recommend voting yes on every school budget.

Town Meeting Day is Tuesday, March 4, 2025. Please email us at hello@greenmountaindsa.org if you’d like to join a canvass between now and then (here’s one option), or if you’d like to see an item on your town’s ballot included in this guide. 

You can check your voter registration here.